-
Rethinking Functional Brain Connectome Analysis: Do Graph Deep Learning Models Help?
Authors:
Keqi Han,
Yao Su,
Lifang He,
Liang Zhan,
Sergey Plis,
Vince Calhoun,
Carl Yang
Abstract:
Functional brain connectome is crucial for deciphering the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive functions and neurological disorders. Graph deep learning models have recently gained tremendous popularity in this field. However, their actual effectiveness in modeling the brain connectome remains unclear. In this study, we re-examine graph deep learning models based on four large-scale neuroimagin…
▽ More
Functional brain connectome is crucial for deciphering the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive functions and neurological disorders. Graph deep learning models have recently gained tremendous popularity in this field. However, their actual effectiveness in modeling the brain connectome remains unclear. In this study, we re-examine graph deep learning models based on four large-scale neuroimaging studies encompassing diverse cognitive and clinical outcomes. Surprisingly, we find that the message aggregation mechanism, a hallmark of graph deep learning models, does not help with predictive performance as typically assumed, but rather consistently degrades it. To address this issue, we propose a hybrid model combining a linear model with a graph attention network through dual pathways, achieving robust predictions and enhanced interpretability by revealing both localized and global neural connectivity patterns. Our findings urge caution in adopting complex deep learning models for functional brain connectome analysis, emphasizing the need for rigorous experimental designs to establish tangible performance gains and perhaps more importantly, to pursue improvements in model interpretability.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
-
Quantifying sex differences in brain network topology by aggregating nodal centrality rankings
Authors:
Wenyu Chen,
Ling Zhan,
Yunsong Luo,
Jiang Qiu,
Tao Jia
Abstract:
Although numerous studies report significant sex differences in functional connectivity, these differences do not sufficient to reveal specific functional disparities among brain regions or the topological differences in brain networks. Meanwhile, individual differences could potentially bias the understanding of these sex differences. To address these challenges, we propose a consensus rank-based…
▽ More
Although numerous studies report significant sex differences in functional connectivity, these differences do not sufficient to reveal specific functional disparities among brain regions or the topological differences in brain networks. Meanwhile, individual differences could potentially bias the understanding of these sex differences. To address these challenges, we propose a consensus rank-based method to quantify sex differences in four node centrality ranking within the functional brain network. This method aggregates individuals' nodal centrality rankings into a consensus or "average" ranking, minimizing the impact of outliers and enhancing the robustness of the findings. By analyzing resting-state functional MRI data from 1,948 healthy young adults (aged 18-27 years, 1,163 females), we find significant sex differences in the topology of functional brain network, primarily attributed to biological sex rather than individual differences. Particularly, sex accounts for approximately 10% of the differences in nodal centrality consensus rankings. Using a rank difference index (RDI), we identify eight critical brain regions with the greatest rank differences, including the insula, supramarginal gyrus, and dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus. females show higher rankings in regions with stronger intra-system connections, whereas males dominate in areas with stronger inter-system connections. Our findings enhance our understanding of sex-specific characteristics in functional brain networks. Moreover, our approach may offer novel insights into targeted population studies, including those involving healthy individuals and patients with brain injuries.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Sex Differences in Hierarchical and Modular Organization of Functional Brain Networks: Insights from Hierarchical Entropy and Modularity Analysis
Authors:
Wenyu Chen,
Ling Zhan,
Tao Jia
Abstract:
Existing studies have demonstrated significant sex differences in the neural mechanisms of daily life and neuropsychiatric disorders. The hierarchical organization of the functional brain network is a critical feature for assessing these neural mechanisms. But sex differences on the hierarchical organization is not fully investigated. Here, we explore whether hierarchical structure of brain networ…
▽ More
Existing studies have demonstrated significant sex differences in the neural mechanisms of daily life and neuropsychiatric disorders. The hierarchical organization of the functional brain network is a critical feature for assessing these neural mechanisms. But sex differences on the hierarchical organization is not fully investigated. Here, we explore whether hierarchical structure of brain network differs between females and males. At the group level, we measure the hierarchical entropy and the maximum modularity of each individual, and identify a significant negative correlation between the complexity of hierarchy and modularity in brain networks. On average, female brain networks have stronger connectivity within the module, whereas male brain networks demonstrate more complex hierarchy. At the consensus level, we use co-classification matrix to investigate the detailed differences in the hierarchical organization between sexes and observe that females and males exhibit different interaction patterns of brain regions in the dorsal attention network (DAN) and visual network (VIN). Our finding suggests that females and males employ different network topology to achieve brain functions. In addition, the negative correlation between hierarchy and modularity implies a need to balance the complexity in hierarchical organization of the brain network, which shed light on future studies of brain functions.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
A genome-scale deep learning model to predict gene expression changes of genetic perturbations from multiplex biological networks
Authors:
Lingmin Zhan,
Yuanyuan Zhang,
Yingdong Wang,
Aoyi Wang,
Caiping Cheng,
Jinzhong Zhao,
Wuxia Zhang,
Peng Lia,
Jianxin Chen
Abstract:
Systematic characterization of biological effects to genetic perturbation is essential to the application of molecular biology and biomedicine. However, the experimental exhaustion of genetic perturbations on the genome-wide scale is challenging. Here, we show that TranscriptionNet, a deep learning model that integrates multiple biological networks to systematically predict transcriptional profile…
▽ More
Systematic characterization of biological effects to genetic perturbation is essential to the application of molecular biology and biomedicine. However, the experimental exhaustion of genetic perturbations on the genome-wide scale is challenging. Here, we show that TranscriptionNet, a deep learning model that integrates multiple biological networks to systematically predict transcriptional profiles to three types of genetic perturbations based on transcriptional profiles induced by genetic perturbations in the L1000 project: RNA interference (RNAi), clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) and overexpression (OE). TranscriptionNet performs better than existing approaches in predicting inducible gene expression changes for all three types of genetic perturbations. TranscriptionNet can predict transcriptional profiles for all genes in existing biological networks and increases perturbational gene expression changes for each type of genetic perturbation from a few thousand to 26,945 genes. TranscriptionNet demonstrates strong generalization ability when comparing predicted and true gene expression changes on different external tasks. Overall, TranscriptionNet can systemically predict transcriptional consequences induced by perturbing genes on a genome-wide scale and thus holds promise to systemically detect gene function and enhance drug development and target discovery.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Incomplete Multimodal Learning for Complex Brain Disorders Prediction
Authors:
Reza Shirkavand,
Liang Zhan,
Heng Huang,
Li Shen,
Paul M. Thompson
Abstract:
Recent advancements in the acquisition of various brain data sources have created new opportunities for integrating multimodal brain data to assist in early detection of complex brain disorders. However, current data integration approaches typically need a complete set of biomedical data modalities, which may not always be feasible, as some modalities are only available in large-scale research coh…
▽ More
Recent advancements in the acquisition of various brain data sources have created new opportunities for integrating multimodal brain data to assist in early detection of complex brain disorders. However, current data integration approaches typically need a complete set of biomedical data modalities, which may not always be feasible, as some modalities are only available in large-scale research cohorts and are prohibitive to collect in routine clinical practice. Especially in studies of brain diseases, research cohorts may include both neuroimaging data and genetic data, but for practical clinical diagnosis, we often need to make disease predictions only based on neuroimages. As a result, it is desired to design machine learning models which can use all available data (different data could provide complementary information) during training but conduct inference using only the most common data modality. We propose a new incomplete multimodal data integration approach that employs transformers and generative adversarial networks to effectively exploit auxiliary modalities available during training in order to improve the performance of a unimodal model at inference. We apply our new method to predict cognitive degeneration and disease outcomes using the multimodal imaging genetic data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms the related machine learning and deep learning methods by a significant margin.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Unified Embeddings of Structural and Functional Connectome via a Function-Constrained Structural Graph Variational Auto-Encoder
Authors:
Carlo Amodeo,
Igor Fortel,
Olusola Ajilore,
Liang Zhan,
Alex Leow,
Theja Tulabandhula
Abstract:
Graph theoretical analyses have become standard tools in modeling functional and anatomical connectivity in the brain. With the advent of connectomics, the primary graphs or networks of interest are structural connectome (derived from DTI tractography) and functional connectome (derived from resting-state fMRI). However, most published connectome studies have focused on either structural or functi…
▽ More
Graph theoretical analyses have become standard tools in modeling functional and anatomical connectivity in the brain. With the advent of connectomics, the primary graphs or networks of interest are structural connectome (derived from DTI tractography) and functional connectome (derived from resting-state fMRI). However, most published connectome studies have focused on either structural or functional connectome, yet complementary information between them, when available in the same dataset, can be jointly leveraged to improve our understanding of the brain. To this end, we propose a function-constrained structural graph variational autoencoder (FCS-GVAE) capable of incorporating information from both functional and structural connectome in an unsupervised fashion. This leads to a joint low-dimensional embedding that establishes a unified spatial coordinate system for comparing across different subjects. We evaluate our approach using the publicly available OASIS-3 Alzheimer's disease (AD) dataset and show that a variational formulation is necessary to optimally encode functional brain dynamics. Further, the proposed joint embedding approach can more accurately distinguish different patient sub-populations than approaches that do not use complementary connectome information.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Functional2Structural: Cross-Modality Brain Networks Representation Learning
Authors:
Haoteng Tang,
Xiyao Fu,
Lei Guo,
Yalin Wang,
Scott Mackin,
Olusola Ajilore,
Alex Leow,
Paul Thompson,
Heng Huang,
Liang Zhan
Abstract:
MRI-based modeling of brain networks has been widely used to understand functional and structural interactions and connections among brain regions, and factors that affect them, such as brain development and disease. Graph mining on brain networks may facilitate the discovery of novel biomarkers for clinical phenotypes and neurodegenerative diseases. Since brain networks derived from functional an…
▽ More
MRI-based modeling of brain networks has been widely used to understand functional and structural interactions and connections among brain regions, and factors that affect them, such as brain development and disease. Graph mining on brain networks may facilitate the discovery of novel biomarkers for clinical phenotypes and neurodegenerative diseases. Since brain networks derived from functional and structural MRI describe the brain topology from different perspectives, exploring a representation that combines these cross-modality brain networks is non-trivial. Most current studies aim to extract a fused representation of the two types of brain network by projecting the structural network to the functional counterpart. Since the functional network is dynamic and the structural network is static, mapping a static object to a dynamic object is suboptimal. However, mapping in the opposite direction is not feasible due to the non-negativity requirement of current graph learning techniques. Here, we propose a novel graph learning framework, known as Deep Signed Brain Networks (DSBN), with a signed graph encoder that, from an opposite perspective, learns the cross-modality representations by projecting the functional network to the structural counterpart. We validate our framework on clinical phenotype and neurodegenerative disease prediction tasks using two independent, publicly available datasets (HCP and OASIS). The experimental results clearly demonstrate the advantages of our model compared to several state-of-the-art methods.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
BrainGB: A Benchmark for Brain Network Analysis with Graph Neural Networks
Authors:
Hejie Cui,
Wei Dai,
Yanqiao Zhu,
Xuan Kan,
Antonio Aodong Chen Gu,
Joshua Lukemire,
Liang Zhan,
Lifang He,
Ying Guo,
Carl Yang
Abstract:
Mapping the connectome of the human brain using structural or functional connectivity has become one of the most pervasive paradigms for neuroimaging analysis. Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) motivated from geometric deep learning have attracted broad interest due to their established power for modeling complex networked data. Despite their superior performance in many fields, there has not…
▽ More
Mapping the connectome of the human brain using structural or functional connectivity has become one of the most pervasive paradigms for neuroimaging analysis. Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) motivated from geometric deep learning have attracted broad interest due to their established power for modeling complex networked data. Despite their superior performance in many fields, there has not yet been a systematic study of how to design effective GNNs for brain network analysis. To bridge this gap, we present BrainGB, a benchmark for brain network analysis with GNNs. BrainGB standardizes the process by (1) summarizing brain network construction pipelines for both functional and structural neuroimaging modalities and (2) modularizing the implementation of GNN designs. We conduct extensive experiments on datasets across cohorts and modalities and recommend a set of general recipes for effective GNN designs on brain networks. To support open and reproducible research on GNN-based brain network analysis, we host the BrainGB website at https://braingb.us with models, tutorials, examples, as well as an out-of-box Python package. We hope that this work will provide useful empirical evidence and offer insights for future research in this novel and promising direction.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2022; v1 submitted 17 March, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Sex-by-age differences in the resting-state brain connectivity
Authors:
Sean D. Conrin,
Liang Zhan,
Zachery D. Morrissey,
Mengqi Xing,
Angus Forbes,
Pauline Maki,
Mohammed R. Milad,
Olusola Ajilore,
Alex D. Leow
Abstract:
Recently we developed a novel method for assessing the hierarchical modularity of functional brain networks - the probability associated community estimation(PACE). The PACE algorithm is unique in that it permits a dual formulation, thus yielding equivalent connectome modular structure regardless of whether considering positive or negative edges. This method was rigorously validated using F1000 an…
▽ More
Recently we developed a novel method for assessing the hierarchical modularity of functional brain networks - the probability associated community estimation(PACE). The PACE algorithm is unique in that it permits a dual formulation, thus yielding equivalent connectome modular structure regardless of whether considering positive or negative edges. This method was rigorously validated using F1000 and HCP data. We detected novel sex differences in resting-state connectivity that were not previously reported. This current study more thoroughly examined sex differences as a function of age and their clinical correlates, with findings supporting a basal configuration framework. To this end, we found that men and women do not significantly differ in the 22-25 age range. However, these same non-significant differences attained statistical significance in the 26-30 age group, while becoming highly statistically significant in the 31-35 age group. At the most global level, areas of diverging sex difference include parts of the prefrontal cortex and the temporal lobe, amygdala, hippocampus, inferior parietal lobule, posterior cingulate, and precuneus. Further, we identified statistically different self-reported summary scores of inattention, hyperactivity, and anxiety problems between men and women. These self-reports additionally divergently interact with age and the basal configuration between sexes. In sum, our study supports a paradigm change in how we conceptualize the functional connectome, shifting away from simple concepts, and towards thinking globally and probabilistically how the brain exhibits dynamic sex-specific connectivity configuration as a function of age, and the role this sex-by-age configuration at rest might play in mental health frequency and presentation, including symptom patterns in depression.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Exploring the Human Connectome Topology in Group Studies
Authors:
Johnson J. G. Keiriz,
Liang Zhan,
Morris Chukhman,
Olu Ajilore,
Alex D. Leow,
Angus G. Forbes
Abstract:
Visually comparing brain networks, or connectomes, is an essential task in the field of neuroscience. Especially relevant to the field of clinical neuroscience, group studies that examine differences between populations or changes over time within a population enable neuroscientists to reason about effective diagnoses and treatments for a range of neuropsychiatric disorders. In this paper, we spec…
▽ More
Visually comparing brain networks, or connectomes, is an essential task in the field of neuroscience. Especially relevant to the field of clinical neuroscience, group studies that examine differences between populations or changes over time within a population enable neuroscientists to reason about effective diagnoses and treatments for a range of neuropsychiatric disorders. In this paper, we specifically explore how visual analytics tools can be used to facilitate various clinical neuroscience tasks, in which observation and analysis of meaningful patterns in the connectome can support patient diagnosis and treatment. We conduct a survey of visualization tasks that enable clinical neuroscience activities, and further explore how existing connectome visualization tools support or fail to support these tasks. Based on our investigation of these tasks, we introduce a novel visualization tool, NeuroCave, to support group studies analyses. We discuss how our design decisions (the use of immersive visualization, the use of hierarchical clustering and dimensionality reduction techniques, and the choice of visual encodings) are motivated by these tasks. We evaluate NeuroCave through two use cases that illustrate the utility of interactive connectome visualization in clinical neuroscience contexts. In the first use case, we study sex differences using functional connectomes and discover hidden connectome patterns associated with well-known cognitive differences in spatial and verbal abilities. In the second use case, we show how the utility of visualizing the brain in different topological space coupled with clustering information can reveal the brain's intrinsic structure.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
The Importance of Being Negative: A serious treatment of non-trivial edges in brain functional connectome
Authors:
Liang Zhan,
Lisanne M. Jenkins,
Ouri E. Wolfson,
Johnson J. GadElkarim,
Kevin Nocito,
Paul M. Thompson,
Olusola A. Ajilore,
Moo K. Chung,
Alex D. Leow
Abstract:
Understanding the modularity of fMRI-derived brain networks or connectomes can inform the study of brain function organization. However, fMRI connectomes additionally involve negative edges, which are not rigorously accounted for by existing approaches to modularity that either ignores or arbitrarily weight these connections. Furthermore, most Q maximization-based modularity algorithms yield varia…
▽ More
Understanding the modularity of fMRI-derived brain networks or connectomes can inform the study of brain function organization. However, fMRI connectomes additionally involve negative edges, which are not rigorously accounted for by existing approaches to modularity that either ignores or arbitrarily weight these connections. Furthermore, most Q maximization-based modularity algorithms yield variable results with suboptimal reproducibility. Here we present an alternative, reproducible approach that exploits how frequent the BOLD-signal correlation between two nodes is negative. We validated this novel probability-based modularity approach on two independent publicly-available resting-state connectome dataset (the Human Connectome Project and the 1000 Functional Connectomes) and demonstrated that negative correlations alone are sufficient in understanding resting-state modularity. In fact, this approach a) permits a dual formulation, leading to equivalent solutions regardless of whether one considers positive or negative edges; b) is theoretically linked to the Ising model defined on the connectome, thus yielding modularity result that maximizes data likelihood. We additionally were able to detect sex differences in modularity that the most widely utilized methods did not. Results confirmed the superiority of our approach in that: a) correlations with the highest probability of being negative are consistently placed between modules, b) due to the equivalent dual forms, no arbitrary weighting factor is required to balance the influence between negative and positive correlations, unlike existing Q maximization-based modularity approaches. As datasets like HCP become widely available for analysis by the neuroscience community at large, appropriate computational tools to understand the neurobiological information of negative edges in fMRI connectomes are increasingly important.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2017; v1 submitted 6 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.