KMT2B-related disorders: expansion of the phenotypic spectrum and long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation
Authors:
L Cif,
D Demailly,
JP Lin,
KE Barwick,
M Sa,
L Abela,
S Malhotra,
WK Chong,
D Steel,
A Sanchis-Juan,
A Ngoh,
N Trump,
E Meyer,
X Vasques,
J Rankin,
MW Allain,
CD Applegate,
S Attaripour Isfahani,
J Baleine,
B Balint,
JA Bassetti,
EL Baple,
KP Bhatia,
C Blanchet,
L Burglen
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Heterozygous mutations in KMT2B are associated with an early-onset, progressive, and often complex dystonia (DYT28). Key characteristics of typical disease include focal motor features at disease presentation, evolving through a caudocranial pattern into generalized dystonia, with prominent oromandibular, laryngeal, and cervical involvement. Although KMT2B-related disease is emerging as one of the…
▽ More
Heterozygous mutations in KMT2B are associated with an early-onset, progressive, and often complex dystonia (DYT28). Key characteristics of typical disease include focal motor features at disease presentation, evolving through a caudocranial pattern into generalized dystonia, with prominent oromandibular, laryngeal, and cervical involvement. Although KMT2B-related disease is emerging as one of the most common causes of early-onset genetic dystonia, much remains to be understood about the full spectrum of the disease. We describe a cohort of 53 patients with KMT2B mutations, with detailed delineation of their clinical phenotype and molecular genetic features. We report new disease presentations, including atypical patterns of dystonia evolution and a subgroup of patients with a non-dystonic neurodevelopmental phenotype. In addition to the previously reported systemic features, our study has identified co-morbidities, including the risk of status dystonicus, intrauterine growth retardation, and endocrinopathies. Analysis of this study cohort (n = 53) in tandem with published cases (n = 80) revealed that patients with chromosomal deletions and protein-truncating variants had a significantly higher burden of systemic disease (with earlier onset of dystonia) than those with missense variants. Eighteen individuals had detailed longitudinal data available after insertion of deep brain stimulation for medically refractory dystonia. Median age at deep brain stimulation was 11.5 years (range: 4.5 to 37.0 years). Follow-up after deep brain stimulation ranged from 0.25 to 22 years. Significant improvement of motor function and disability (as assessed by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scales, BFMDRS-M and BFMDRS-D) was evident at 6 months, 1 year, and last follow-up (motor, P = 0.001, P = 0.004, and P = 0.012; disability, P = 0.009, P = 0.002, and P = 0.012).
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
Community recommendations on cryoEM data archiving and validation
Authors:
Gerard J. Kleywegt,
Paul D. Adams,
Sarah J. Butcher,
Cathy Lawson,
Alexis Rohou,
Peter B. Rosenthal,
Sriram Subramaniam,
Maya Topf,
Sanja Abbott,
Philip R. Baldwin,
John M. Berrisford,
Gérard Bricogne,
Preeti Choudhary,
Tristan I. Croll,
Radostin Danev,
Sai J. Ganesan,
Timothy Grant,
Aleksandras Gutmanas,
Richard Henderson,
J. Bernard Heymann,
Juha T. Huiskonen,
Andrei Istrate,
Takayuki Kato,
Gabriel C. Lander,
Shee-Mei Lok
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In January 2020, a workshop was held at EMBL-EBI (Hinxton, UK) to discuss data requirements for deposition and validation of cryoEM structures, with a focus on single-particle analysis. The meeting was attended by 45 experts in data processing, model building and refinement, validation, and archiving of such structures. This report describes the workshop's motivation and history, the topics discus…
▽ More
In January 2020, a workshop was held at EMBL-EBI (Hinxton, UK) to discuss data requirements for deposition and validation of cryoEM structures, with a focus on single-particle analysis. The meeting was attended by 45 experts in data processing, model building and refinement, validation, and archiving of such structures. This report describes the workshop's motivation and history, the topics discussed, and consensus recommendations resulting from the workshop. Some challenges for future methods-development efforts in this area are also highlighted, as is the implementation to date of some of the recommendations.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2024; v1 submitted 29 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
