Deep learning can differentiate IDH-mutant from IDH-wild type GBM
Authors:
Luca Pasquini,
Antonio Napolitano,
Emanuela Tagliente,
Francesco Dellepiane,
Martina Lucignani,
Antonello Vidiri,
Giulio Ranazzi,
Antonella Stoppacciaro,
Giulia Moltoni,
Matteo Nicolai,
Andrea Romano,
Alberto Di Napoli,
Alessandro Bozzao
Abstract:
Background: Distinction of IDH mutant and wildtype GBMs is challenging on MRI, since conventional imaging shows considerable overlap. While few studies employed deep-learning in a mixed low/high grade glioma population, a GBM-specific model is still lacking in the literature. Our objective was to develop a deep-learning model for IDH prediction in GBM by using Convoluted Neural Networks (CNN) on m…
▽ More
Background: Distinction of IDH mutant and wildtype GBMs is challenging on MRI, since conventional imaging shows considerable overlap. While few studies employed deep-learning in a mixed low/high grade glioma population, a GBM-specific model is still lacking in the literature. Our objective was to develop a deep-learning model for IDH prediction in GBM by using Convoluted Neural Networks (CNN) on multiparametric MRI. Methods: We included 100 adult patients with pathologically proven GBM and IDH testing. MRI data included: morphologic sequences, rCBV and ADC maps. Tumor area was obtained by a bounding box function on the axial slice with widest tumor extension on T2 images and was projected on every sequence. Data was split into training and test (80:20) sets. A 4 block 2D - CNN architecture was implemented for IDH prediction on every MRI sequence. IDH mutation probability was calculated with softmax activation function from the last dense layer. Highest performance was calculated accounting for model accuracy and categorical cross-entropy loss (CCEL) in the test cohort. Results: Our model achieved the following performance: T1 (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.4), T2 (accuracy 67%, CCEL 2.41), FLAIR (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.98), MPRAGE (accuracy 66%, CCEL 2.55), rCBV (accuracy 83%, CCEL 0.64). ADC achieved lower performance. Conclusion: We built a GBM-tailored deep-learning model for IDH mutation prediction, achieving accuracy of 83% with rCBV maps. High predictivity of perfusion images may reflect the known correlation between IDH, hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) and neoangiogenesis. This model may set a path for non-invasive evaluation of IDH mutation in GBM.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers to Predict Patient Survival and Genetics of GBM: Towards a Standardized Model for Clinical Implementation
Authors:
Luca Pasquini,
Antonio Napolitano,
Martina Lucignani,
Emanuela Tagliente,
Francesco Dellepiane,
Maria Camilla Rossi-Espagnet,
Matteo Ritrovato,
Antonello Vidiri,
Veronica Villani,
Giulio Ranazzi,
Antonella Stoppacciaro,
Andrea Romano,
Alberto Di Napoli,
Alessandro Bozzao
Abstract:
Radiomic models have been shown to outperform clinical data for outcome prediction in glioblastoma (GBM). However, clinical implementation is limited by lack of parameters standardization. We aimed to compare nine machine learning classifiers, with different optimization parameters, to predict overall survival (OS), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (…
▽ More
Radiomic models have been shown to outperform clinical data for outcome prediction in glioblastoma (GBM). However, clinical implementation is limited by lack of parameters standardization. We aimed to compare nine machine learning classifiers, with different optimization parameters, to predict overall survival (OS), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) VII amplification and Ki-67 expression in GBM patients, based on radiomic features from conventional and advanced MR. 156 adult patients with pathologic diagnosis of GBM were included. Three tumoral regions were analyzed: contrast-enhancing tumor, necrosis and non-enhancing tumor, selected by manual segmentation. Radiomic features were extracted with a custom version of Pyradiomics, and selected through Boruta algorithm. A Grid Search algorithm was applied when computing 4 times K-fold cross validation (K=10) to get the highest mean and lowest spread of accuracy. Once optimal parameters were identified, model performances were assessed in terms of Area Under The Curve-Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUC-ROC). Metaheuristic and ensemble classifiers showed the best performance across tasks. xGB obtained maximum accuracy for OS (74.5%), AB for IDH mutation (88%), MGMT methylation (71,7%), Ki-67 expression (86,6%), and EGFR amplification (81,6%). Best performing features shed light on possible correlations between MR and tumor histology.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
