Go with the FLOW: Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics in optical widefield calcium imaging
Authors:
Nathaniel J Linden,
Dennis R Tabuena,
Nicholas A Steinmetz,
William J Moody,
Steven L Brunton,
Bingni W Brunton
Abstract:
Widefield calcium imaging has recently emerged as a powerful experimental technique to record coordinated large-scale brain activity. These measurements present a unique opportunity to characterize spatiotemporal coherent structures that underlie neural activity across many regions of the brain. In this work, we leverage analytic techniques from fluid dynamics to develop a visualization framework…
▽ More
Widefield calcium imaging has recently emerged as a powerful experimental technique to record coordinated large-scale brain activity. These measurements present a unique opportunity to characterize spatiotemporal coherent structures that underlie neural activity across many regions of the brain. In this work, we leverage analytic techniques from fluid dynamics to develop a visualization framework that highlights features of flow across the cortex, mapping wave fronts that may be correlated with behavioral events. First, we transform the time series of widefield calcium images into time-varying vector fields using optic flow. Next, we extract concise diagrams summarizing the dynamics, which we refer to as FLOW (flow lines in optical widefield imaging) portraits. These FLOW portraits provide an intuitive map of dynamic calcium activity, including regions of initiation and termination, as well as the direction and extent of activity spread. To extract these structures, we use the finite-time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) technique developed to analyze time-varying manifolds in unsteady fluids. Importantly, our approach captures coherent structures that are poorly represented by traditional modal decomposition techniques. We demonstrate the application of FLOW portraits on three simple synthetic datasets and two widefield calcium imaging datasets, including cortical waves in the developing mouse and spontaneous cortical activity in an adult mouse.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2021; v1 submitted 29 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
A mathematical model for distinguishing bias from sensitivity effects in multialternative detection tasks
Authors:
Devarajan Sridharan,
Nicholas A. Steinmetz,
Tirin Moore,
Eric I. Knudsen
Abstract:
Studies investigating the neural bases of cognitive phenomena such as perception, attention and decision-making increasingly employ multialternative task designs. It is essential in such designs to distinguish the neural correlates of behavioral choices arising from changes in perceptual factors, such as enhanced sensitivity to sensory information, from those arising from changes in decisional fac…
▽ More
Studies investigating the neural bases of cognitive phenomena such as perception, attention and decision-making increasingly employ multialternative task designs. It is essential in such designs to distinguish the neural correlates of behavioral choices arising from changes in perceptual factors, such as enhanced sensitivity to sensory information, from those arising from changes in decisional factors, such as a stronger bias for a particular response or choice (choice bias). To date such a distinction is not possible with established approaches. Thus, there is a critical need for a theoretical approach that distinguishes the effects of changes in sensitivity from those of changes in choice bias in multialternative tasks. Here, we introduce a mathematical model that decouples choice bias from perceptual sensitivity effects in multialternative detection tasks: multialternative tasks that incorporate catch trials to measure the ability to detect one among multiple (potential) stimuli or stimulus features. By formulating the perceptual decision in a novel, multidimensional signal detection framework, our model identifies the distinct effects of bias and sensitivity on behavioral choices. With a combination of analytical and numerical approaches, we demonstrate that model parameters (sensitivity, bias) are estimated reliably and uniquely, even in tasks involving arbitrarily large numbers of alternatives. Model simulations revealed that ignoring choice bias or performance during catch trials produced systematically inaccurate estimates of perceptual sensitivity, a finding that has important implications for interpreting behavioral data in multialternative detection and cued attention tasks. The model will find important application in identifying the effects of neural perturbations (stimulation or inactivation) on an animal's perception in multialternative attention and decision-making tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
