-
Self-orthogonalizing attractor neural networks emerging from the free energy principle
Authors:
Tamas Spisak,
Karl Friston
Abstract:
Attractor dynamics are a hallmark of many complex systems, including the brain. Understanding how such self-organizing dynamics emerge from first principles is crucial for advancing our understanding of neuronal computations and the design of artificial intelligence systems. Here we formalize how attractor networks emerge from the free energy principle applied to a universal partitioning of random…
▽ More
Attractor dynamics are a hallmark of many complex systems, including the brain. Understanding how such self-organizing dynamics emerge from first principles is crucial for advancing our understanding of neuronal computations and the design of artificial intelligence systems. Here we formalize how attractor networks emerge from the free energy principle applied to a universal partitioning of random dynamical systems. Our approach obviates the need for explicitly imposed learning and inference rules and identifies emergent, but efficient and biologically plausible inference and learning dynamics for such self-organizing systems. These result in a collective, multi-level Bayesian active inference process. Attractors on the free energy landscape encode prior beliefs; inference integrates sensory data into posterior beliefs; and learning fine-tunes couplings to minimize long-term surprise. Analytically and via simulations, we establish that the proposed networks favor approximately orthogonalized attractor representations, a consequence of simultaneously optimizing predictive accuracy and model complexity. These attractors efficiently span the input subspace, enhancing generalization and the mutual information between hidden causes and observable effects. Furthermore, while random data presentation leads to symmetric and sparse couplings, sequential data fosters asymmetric couplings and non-equilibrium steady-state dynamics, offering a natural extension to conventional Boltzmann Machines. Our findings offer a unifying theory of self-organizing attractor networks, providing novel insights for AI and neuroscience.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
The Past, Present, and Future of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS)
Authors:
Russell A. Poldrack,
Christopher J. Markiewicz,
Stefan Appelhoff,
Yoni K. Ashar,
Tibor Auer,
Sylvain Baillet,
Shashank Bansal,
Leandro Beltrachini,
Christian G. Benar,
Giacomo Bertazzoli,
Suyash Bhogawar,
Ross W. Blair,
Marta Bortoletto,
Mathieu Boudreau,
Teon L. Brooks,
Vince D. Calhoun,
Filippo Maria Castelli,
Patricia Clement,
Alexander L Cohen,
Julien Cohen-Adad,
Sasha D'Ambrosio,
Gilles de Hollander,
María de la iglesia-Vayá,
Alejandro de la Vega,
Arnaud Delorme
, et al. (89 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves.…
▽ More
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves. We also discuss the lessons learned through the project, with the aim of enabling researchers in other domains to learn from the success of BIDS.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Statistical quantification of confounding bias in predictive modelling
Authors:
Tamas Spisak
Abstract:
The lack of non-parametric statistical tests for confounding bias significantly hampers the development of robust, valid and generalizable predictive models in many fields of research. Here I propose the partial and full confounder tests, which, for a given confounder variable, probe the null hypotheses of unconfounded and fully confounded models, respectively. The tests provide a strict control f…
▽ More
The lack of non-parametric statistical tests for confounding bias significantly hampers the development of robust, valid and generalizable predictive models in many fields of research. Here I propose the partial and full confounder tests, which, for a given confounder variable, probe the null hypotheses of unconfounded and fully confounded models, respectively. The tests provide a strict control for Type I errors and high statistical power, even for non-normally and non-linearly dependent predictions, often seen in machine learning. Applying the proposed tests on models trained on functional brain connectivity data from the Human Connectome Project and the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange dataset reveals confounders that were previously unreported or found to be hard to correct for with state-of-the-art confound mitigation approaches. The tests, implemented in the package mlconfound (https://mlconfound.readthedocs.io), can aid the assessment and improvement of the generalizability and neurobiological validity of predictive models and, thereby, foster the development of clinically useful machine learning biomarkers.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
