-
Go Figure: Transparency in neuroscience images preserves context and clarifies interpretation
Authors:
Paul A. Taylor,
Himanshu Aggarwal,
Peter Bandettini,
Marco Barilari,
Molly Bright,
Cesar Caballero-Gaudes,
Vince Calhoun,
Mallar Chakravarty,
Gabriel Devenyi,
Jennifer Evans,
Eduardo Garza-Villarreal,
Jalil Rasgado-Toledo,
Remi Gau,
Daniel Glen,
Rainer Goebel,
Javier Gonzalez-Castillo,
Omer Faruk Gulban,
Yaroslav Halchenko,
Daniel Handwerker,
Taylor Hanayik,
Peter Lauren,
David Leopold,
Jason Lerch,
Christian Mathys,
Paul McCarthy
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Visualizations are vital for communicating scientific results. Historically, neuroimaging figures have only depicted regions that surpass a given statistical threshold. This practice substantially biases interpretation of the results and subsequent meta-analyses, particularly towards non-reproducibility. Here we advocate for a "transparent thresholding" approach that not only highlights statistica…
▽ More
Visualizations are vital for communicating scientific results. Historically, neuroimaging figures have only depicted regions that surpass a given statistical threshold. This practice substantially biases interpretation of the results and subsequent meta-analyses, particularly towards non-reproducibility. Here we advocate for a "transparent thresholding" approach that not only highlights statistically significant regions but also includes subthreshold locations, which provide key experimental context. This balances the dual needs of distilling modeling results and enabling informed interpretations for modern neuroimaging. We present four examples that demonstrate the many benefits of transparent thresholding, including: removing ambiguity, decreasing hypersensitivity to non-physiological features, catching potential artifacts, improving cross-study comparisons, reducing non-reproducibility biases, and clarifying interpretations. We also demonstrate the many software packages that implement transparent thresholding, several of which were added or streamlined recently as part of this work. A point-counterpoint discussion addresses issues with thresholding raised in real conversations with researchers in the field. We hope that by showing how transparent thresholding can drastically improve the interpretation (and reproducibility) of neuroimaging findings, more researchers will adopt this method.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
The Past, Present, and Future of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS)
Authors:
Russell A. Poldrack,
Christopher J. Markiewicz,
Stefan Appelhoff,
Yoni K. Ashar,
Tibor Auer,
Sylvain Baillet,
Shashank Bansal,
Leandro Beltrachini,
Christian G. Benar,
Giacomo Bertazzoli,
Suyash Bhogawar,
Ross W. Blair,
Marta Bortoletto,
Mathieu Boudreau,
Teon L. Brooks,
Vince D. Calhoun,
Filippo Maria Castelli,
Patricia Clement,
Alexander L Cohen,
Julien Cohen-Adad,
Sasha D'Ambrosio,
Gilles de Hollander,
María de la iglesia-Vayá,
Alejandro de la Vega,
Arnaud Delorme
, et al. (89 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves.…
▽ More
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves. We also discuss the lessons learned through the project, with the aim of enabling researchers in other domains to learn from the success of BIDS.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
brainlife.io: A decentralized and open source cloud platform to support neuroscience research
Authors:
Soichi Hayashi,
Bradley A. Caron,
Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld,
Sophia Vinci-Booher,
Brent McPherson,
Daniel N. Bullock,
Giulia Bertò,
Guiomar Niso,
Sandra Hanekamp,
Daniel Levitas,
Kimberly Ray,
Anne MacKenzie,
Lindsey Kitchell,
Josiah K. Leong,
Filipi Nascimento-Silva,
Serge Koudoro,
Hanna Willis,
Jasleen K. Jolly,
Derek Pisner,
Taylor R. Zuidema,
Jan W. Kurzawski,
Kyriaki Mikellidou,
Aurore Bussalb,
Christopher Rorden,
Conner Victory
, et al. (39 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuroscience research has expanded dramatically over the past 30 years by advancing standardization and tool development to support rigor and transparency. Consequently, the complexity of the data pipeline has also increased, hindering access to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperabile, and Reusable) data analysis to portions of the worldwide research community. brainlife.io was developed to red…
▽ More
Neuroscience research has expanded dramatically over the past 30 years by advancing standardization and tool development to support rigor and transparency. Consequently, the complexity of the data pipeline has also increased, hindering access to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperabile, and Reusable) data analysis to portions of the worldwide research community. brainlife.io was developed to reduce these burdens and democratize modern neuroscience research across institutions and career levels. Using community software and hardware infrastructure, the platform provides open-source data standardization, management, visualization, and processing and simplifies the data pipeline. brainlife.io automatically tracks the provenance history of thousands of data objects, supporting simplicity, efficiency, and transparency in neuroscience research. Here brainlife.io's technology and data services are described and evaluated for validity, reliability, reproducibility, replicability, and scientific utility. Using data from 4 modalities and 3,200 participants, we demonstrate that brainlife.io's services produce outputs that adhere to best practices in modern neuroscience research.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2023; v1 submitted 3 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
