FAIR Data Pipeline: provenance-driven data management for traceable scientific workflows
Authors:
Sonia Natalie Mitchell,
Andrew Lahiff,
Nathan Cummings,
Jonathan Hollocombe,
Bram Boskamp,
Ryan Field,
Dennis Reddyhoff,
Kristian Zarebski,
Antony Wilson,
Bruno Viola,
Martin Burke,
Blair Archibald,
Paul Bessell,
Richard Blackwell,
Lisa A Boden,
Alys Brett,
Sam Brett,
Ruth Dundas,
Jessica Enright,
Alejandra N. Gonzalez-Beltran,
Claire Harris,
Ian Hinder,
Christopher David Hughes,
Martin Knight,
Vino Mano
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Modern epidemiological analyses to understand and combat the spread of disease depend critically on access to, and use of, data. Rapidly evolving data, such as data streams changing during a disease outbreak, are particularly challenging. Data management is further complicated by data being imprecisely identified when used. Public trust in policy decisions resulting from such analyses is easily da…
▽ More
Modern epidemiological analyses to understand and combat the spread of disease depend critically on access to, and use of, data. Rapidly evolving data, such as data streams changing during a disease outbreak, are particularly challenging. Data management is further complicated by data being imprecisely identified when used. Public trust in policy decisions resulting from such analyses is easily damaged and is often low, with cynicism arising where claims of "following the science" are made without accompanying evidence. Tracing the provenance of such decisions back through open software to primary data would clarify this evidence, enhancing the transparency of the decision-making process. Here, we demonstrate a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data pipeline developed during the COVID-19 pandemic that allows easy annotation of data as they are consumed by analyses, while tracing the provenance of scientific outputs back through the analytical source code to data sources. Such a tool provides a mechanism for the public, and fellow scientists, to better assess the trust that should be placed in scientific evidence, while allowing scientists to support policy-makers in openly justifying their decisions. We believe that tools such as this should be promoted for use across all areas of policy-facing research.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2022; v1 submitted 13 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
Swimming with a friend at low Reynolds number
Authors:
C. M. Pooley,
G. P. Alexander,
J. M. Yeomans
Abstract:
We investigate the hydrodynamic interactions between microorganisms swimming at low Reynolds number. By considering simple model swimmers, and combining analytic and numerical approaches, we investigate the time-averaged flow field around a swimmer. At short distances the swimmer behaves like a pump. At large distances the velocity field depends on whether the swimming stroke is invariant under…
▽ More
We investigate the hydrodynamic interactions between microorganisms swimming at low Reynolds number. By considering simple model swimmers, and combining analytic and numerical approaches, we investigate the time-averaged flow field around a swimmer. At short distances the swimmer behaves like a pump. At large distances the velocity field depends on whether the swimming stroke is invariant under a combined time-reversal and parity transformation. We then consider two swimmers and find that the interaction between them consists of two parts; a dead term, independent of the motion of the second swimmer, which takes the expected dipolar form and a live term resulting from the simultaneous swimming action of both swimmers which does not. We argue that, in general, the latter dominates. The swimmer--swimmer interaction is a complicated function of their relative displacement, orientation and phase, leading to motion that can be attractive, repulsive or oscillatory.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2007;
originally announced May 2007.
