Desiderata of evidence for representation in neuroscience
Authors:
Stephan Pohl,
Edgar Y. Walker,
David L. Barack,
Jennifer Lee,
Rachel N. Denison,
Ned Block,
Florent Meyniel,
Wei Ji Ma
Abstract:
This paper develops a systematic framework for the evidence neuroscientists use to establish whether a neural response represents a feature. Researchers try to establish that the neural response is (1) sensitive and (2) specific to the feature, (3) invariant to other features, and (4) functional, which means that it is used downstream in the brain. We formalize these desiderata in information-theo…
▽ More
This paper develops a systematic framework for the evidence neuroscientists use to establish whether a neural response represents a feature. Researchers try to establish that the neural response is (1) sensitive and (2) specific to the feature, (3) invariant to other features, and (4) functional, which means that it is used downstream in the brain. We formalize these desiderata in information-theoretic terms. This formalism allows us to precisely state the desiderata while unifying the different analysis methods used in neuroscience under one framework. We discuss how common methods such as correlational analyses, decoding and encoding models, representational similarity analysis, and tests of statistical dependence are used to evaluate the desiderata. In doing so, we provide a common terminology to researchers that helps to clarify disagreements, to compare and integrate results across studies and research groups, and to identify when evidence might be missing and when evidence for some representational conclusion is strong. We illustrate the framework with several canonical examples, including the representation of orientation, numerosity, faces, and spatial location. We end by discussing how the framework can be extended to cover models of the neural code, multi-stage models, and other domains.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Studying the neural representations of uncertainty
Authors:
Edgar Y Walker,
Stephan Pohl,
Rachel N Denison,
David L Barack,
Jennifer Lee,
Ned Block,
Wei Ji Ma,
Florent Meyniel
Abstract:
The study of the brain's representations of uncertainty is a central topic in neuroscience. Unlike most quantities of which the neural representation is studied, uncertainty is a property of an observer's beliefs about the world, which poses specific methodological challenges. We analyze how the literature on the neural representations of uncertainty addresses those challenges and distinguish betw…
▽ More
The study of the brain's representations of uncertainty is a central topic in neuroscience. Unlike most quantities of which the neural representation is studied, uncertainty is a property of an observer's beliefs about the world, which poses specific methodological challenges. We analyze how the literature on the neural representations of uncertainty addresses those challenges and distinguish between "code-driven" and "correlational" approaches. Code-driven approaches make assumptions about the neural code for representing world states and the associated uncertainty. By contrast, correlational approaches search for relationships between uncertainty and neural activity without constraints on the neural representation of the world state that this uncertainty accompanies. To compare these two approaches, we apply several criteria for neural representations: sensitivity, specificity, invariance, functionality. Our analysis reveals that the two approaches lead to different, but complementary findings, shaping new research questions and guiding future experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2023; v1 submitted 9 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
