-
Revealing higher-order neural representations with generative artificial intelligence
Authors:
Hojjat Azimi Asrari,
Megan A. K. Peters
Abstract:
Studies often aim to reveal how neural representations encode aspects of an observer's environment, such as its contents or structure. These are ``first-order" representations (FORs), because they're ``about" the external world. A less-common target is ``higher-order" representations (HORs), which are ``about" FORs -- their contents, stability, or uncertainty. HORs of uncertainty appear critically…
▽ More
Studies often aim to reveal how neural representations encode aspects of an observer's environment, such as its contents or structure. These are ``first-order" representations (FORs), because they're ``about" the external world. A less-common target is ``higher-order" representations (HORs), which are ``about" FORs -- their contents, stability, or uncertainty. HORs of uncertainty appear critically involved in adaptive behaviors including learning under uncertainty, influencing learning rates and internal model updating based on environmental feedback. However, HORs about uncertainty are unlikely to be direct ``read-outs" of FOR characteristics, instead reflecting estimation processes which may be lossy, bias-prone, or distortive and which may also incorporate estimates of distributions of uncertainty the observer is likely to experience. While some research has targeted neural representations of ``instantaneously" estimated uncertainty, how the brain represents \textit{distributions} of expected uncertainty remains largely unexplored. Here, we propose a novel reinforcement learning (RL) based generative artificial intelligence (genAI) approach to explore neural representations of uncertainty distributions. We use existing functional magnetic resonance imaging data, where humans learned to `de-noise' their brain states to achieve target neural patterns, to train denoising diffusion genAI models with RL algorithms to learn noise distributions similar to how humans might learn to do the same. We then explore these models' learned noise-distribution HORs compared to control models trained with traditional backpropagation. Results reveal model-dependent differences in noise distribution representations -- with the RL-based model offering much higher explanatory power for human behavior -- offering an exciting path towards using genAI to explore neural noise-distribution HORs.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Domain adaptation in small-scale and heterogeneous biological datasets
Authors:
Seyedmehdi Orouji,
Martin C. Liu,
Tal Korem,
Megan A. K. Peters
Abstract:
Machine learning techniques are steadily becoming more important in modern biology, and are used to build predictive models, discover patterns, and investigate biological problems. However, models trained on one dataset are often not generalizable to other datasets from different cohorts or laboratories, due to differences in the statistical properties of these datasets. These could stem from tech…
▽ More
Machine learning techniques are steadily becoming more important in modern biology, and are used to build predictive models, discover patterns, and investigate biological problems. However, models trained on one dataset are often not generalizable to other datasets from different cohorts or laboratories, due to differences in the statistical properties of these datasets. These could stem from technical differences, such as the measurement technique used, or from relevant biological differences between the populations studied. Domain adaptation, a type of transfer learning, can alleviate this problem by aligning the statistical distributions of features and samples among different datasets so that similar models can be applied across them. However, a majority of state-of-the-art domain adaptation methods are designed to work with large-scale data, mostly text and images, while biological datasets often suffer from small sample sizes, and possess complexities such as heterogeneity of the feature space. This Review aims to synthetically discuss domain adaptation methods in the context of small-scale and highly heterogeneous biological data. We describe the benefits and challenges of domain adaptation in biological research and critically discuss some of its objectives, strengths, and weaknesses through key representative methodologies. We argue for the incorporation of domain adaptation techniques to the computational biologist's toolkit, with further development of customized approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Generative Adversarial Collaborations: A practical guide for conference organizers and participating scientists
Authors:
Gunnar Blohm,
Benjamin Peters,
Ralf Haefner,
Leyla Isik,
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,
Jennifer S. Lieberman,
Carlos R. Ponce,
Gemma Roig,
Megan A. K. Peters
Abstract:
Generative adversarial collaborations (GACs) are a form of formal teamwork between groups of scientists with diverging views. The goal of GACs is to identify and ultimately resolve the most important challenges, controversies, and exciting theoretical and empirical debates in a given research field. A GAC team would develop specific, agreed-upon avenues to resolve debates in order to move a field…
▽ More
Generative adversarial collaborations (GACs) are a form of formal teamwork between groups of scientists with diverging views. The goal of GACs is to identify and ultimately resolve the most important challenges, controversies, and exciting theoretical and empirical debates in a given research field. A GAC team would develop specific, agreed-upon avenues to resolve debates in order to move a field of research forward in a collaborative way. Such adversarial collaborations have many benefits and opportunities but also come with challenges. Here, we use our experience from (1) creating and running the GAC program for the Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN) conference and (2) implementing and leading GACs on particular scientific problems to provide a practical guide for future GAC program organizers and leaders of individual GACs.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Authors:
Patrick Butlin,
Robert Long,
Eric Elmoznino,
Yoshua Bengio,
Jonathan Birch,
Axel Constant,
George Deane,
Stephen M. Fleming,
Chris Frith,
Xu Ji,
Ryota Kanai,
Colin Klein,
Grace Lindsay,
Matthias Michel,
Liad Mudrik,
Megan A. K. Peters,
Eric Schwitzgebel,
Jonathan Simon,
Rufin VanRullen
Abstract:
Whether current or near-term AI systems could be conscious is a topic of scientific interest and increasing public concern. This report argues for, and exemplifies, a rigorous and empirically grounded approach to AI consciousness: assessing existing AI systems in detail, in light of our best-supported neuroscientific theories of consciousness. We survey several prominent scientific theories of con…
▽ More
Whether current or near-term AI systems could be conscious is a topic of scientific interest and increasing public concern. This report argues for, and exemplifies, a rigorous and empirically grounded approach to AI consciousness: assessing existing AI systems in detail, in light of our best-supported neuroscientific theories of consciousness. We survey several prominent scientific theories of consciousness, including recurrent processing theory, global workspace theory, higher-order theories, predictive processing, and attention schema theory. From these theories we derive "indicator properties" of consciousness, elucidated in computational terms that allow us to assess AI systems for these properties. We use these indicator properties to assess several recent AI systems, and we discuss how future systems might implement them. Our analysis suggests that no current AI systems are conscious, but also suggests that there are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy these indicators.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2023; v1 submitted 16 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
"Task-relevant autoencoding" enhances machine learning for human neuroscience
Authors:
Seyedmehdi Orouji,
Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel,
Aurelio Cortese,
Brian Odegaard,
Cody Cushing,
Mouslim Cherkaoui,
Mitsuo Kawato,
Hakwan Lau,
Megan A. K. Peters
Abstract:
In human neuroscience, machine learning can help reveal lower-dimensional neural representations relevant to subjects' behavior. However, state-of-the-art models typically require large datasets to train, so are prone to overfitting on human neuroimaging data that often possess few samples but many input dimensions. Here, we capitalized on the fact that the features we seek in human neuroscience a…
▽ More
In human neuroscience, machine learning can help reveal lower-dimensional neural representations relevant to subjects' behavior. However, state-of-the-art models typically require large datasets to train, so are prone to overfitting on human neuroimaging data that often possess few samples but many input dimensions. Here, we capitalized on the fact that the features we seek in human neuroscience are precisely those relevant to subjects' behavior. We thus developed a Task-Relevant Autoencoder via Classifier Enhancement (TRACE), and tested its ability to extract behaviorally-relevant, separable representations compared to a standard autoencoder, a variational autoencoder, and principal component analysis for two severely truncated machine learning datasets. We then evaluated all models on fMRI data from 59 subjects who observed animals and objects. TRACE outperformed all models nearly unilaterally, showing up to 12% increased classification accuracy and up to 56% improvement in discovering "cleaner", task-relevant representations. These results showcase TRACE's potential for a wide variety of data related to human behavior.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2023; v1 submitted 17 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Neuromatch Academy: Teaching Computational Neuroscience with global accessibility
Authors:
Tara van Viegen,
Athena Akrami,
Kate Bonnen,
Eric DeWitt,
Alexandre Hyafil,
Helena Ledmyr,
Grace W. Lindsay,
Patrick Mineault,
John D. Murray,
Xaq Pitkow,
Aina Puce,
Madineh Sedigh-Sarvestani,
Carsen Stringer,
Titipat Achakulvisut,
Elnaz Alikarami,
Melvin Selim Atay,
Eleanor Batty,
Jeffrey C. Erlich,
Byron V. Galbraith,
Yueqi Guo,
Ashley L. Juavinett,
Matthew R. Krause,
Songting Li,
Marius Pachitariu,
Elizabeth Straley
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuromatch Academy designed and ran a fully online 3-week Computational Neuroscience summer school for 1757 students with 191 teaching assistants working in virtual inverted (or flipped) classrooms and on small group projects. Fourteen languages, active community management, and low cost allowed for an unprecedented level of inclusivity and universal accessibility.
Neuromatch Academy designed and ran a fully online 3-week Computational Neuroscience summer school for 1757 students with 191 teaching assistants working in virtual inverted (or flipped) classrooms and on small group projects. Fourteen languages, active community management, and low cost allowed for an unprecedented level of inclusivity and universal accessibility.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
