Optimal governance and implementation of vaccination programmes to contain the COVID-19 pandemic
Authors:
Mahendra Piraveenan,
Shailendra Sawleshwarkar,
Michael Walsh,
Iryna Zablotska,
Samit Bhattacharyya,
Habib Hassan Farooqui,
Tarun Bhatnagar,
Anup Karan,
Manoj Murhekar,
Sanjay Zodpey,
K. S. Mallikarjuna Rao,
Philippa Pattison,
Albert Zomaya,
Matjaz Perc
Abstract:
Since the recent introduction of several viable vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, vaccination uptake has become the key factor that will determine our success in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that game theory and social network models should be used to guide decisions pertaining to vaccination programmes for the best possible results. In the months following the introduction of vaccines, their…
▽ More
Since the recent introduction of several viable vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, vaccination uptake has become the key factor that will determine our success in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that game theory and social network models should be used to guide decisions pertaining to vaccination programmes for the best possible results. In the months following the introduction of vaccines, their availability and the human resources needed to run the vaccination programmes have been scarce in many countries. Vaccine hesitancy is also being encountered from some sections of the general public. We emphasize that decision-making under uncertainty and imperfect information, and with only conditionally optimal outcomes, is a unique forte of established game-theoretic modelling. Therefore, we can use this approach to obtain the best framework for modelling and simulating vaccination prioritization and uptake that will be readily available to inform important policy decisions for the optimal control of the COVID-19 pandemic.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2021; v1 submitted 12 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
Game theoretic modelling of infectious disease dynamics and intervention methods: a mini-review
Authors:
Sheryl L. Chang,
Mahendra Piraveenan,
Philippa Pattison,
Mikhail Prokopenko
Abstract:
We review research papers which use game theory to model the decision making of individuals during an epidemic, attempting to classify the literature and identify the emerging trends in this field. We show that the literature can be classified based on (i) type of population modelling (compartmental or network-based), (ii) frequency of the game (non-iterative or iterative), and (iii) type of strat…
▽ More
We review research papers which use game theory to model the decision making of individuals during an epidemic, attempting to classify the literature and identify the emerging trends in this field. We show that the literature can be classified based on (i) type of population modelling (compartmental or network-based), (ii) frequency of the game (non-iterative or iterative), and (iii) type of strategy adoption (self-evaluation or imitation). We highlight that the choice of model depends on many factors such as the type of immunity the disease confers, the type of immunity the vaccine confers, and size of population and level of mixing therein. We show that while early studies used compartmental modelling with self-evaluation based strategy adoption, the recent trend is to use network-based modelling with imitation-based strategy adoption. Our review indicates that game theory continues to be an effective tool to model intervention (vaccination or social distancing) decision-making by individuals.
△ Less
Submitted 14 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
