Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Pérez-Escudero, A

The Informative Herd: why humans and other animals imitate more when conditions are adverse

Authors: Alfonso Pérez-Escudero, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja

Abstract: Decisions in a group often result in imitation and aggregation, which are enhanced in panic, dangerous, stressful or negative situations. Current explanations of this enhancement are restricted to particular contexts, such as anti-predatory behavior, deflection of responsibility in humans, or cases in which the negative situation is associated with an increase in uncertainty. But this effect is ob… ▽ More Decisions in a group often result in imitation and aggregation, which are enhanced in panic, dangerous, stressful or negative situations. Current explanations of this enhancement are restricted to particular contexts, such as anti-predatory behavior, deflection of responsibility in humans, or cases in which the negative situation is associated with an increase in uncertainty. But this effect is observed across taxa and in very diverse conditions, suggesting that it may arise from a more general cause, such as a fundamental characteristic of social decision-making. Current decision-making theories do not explain it, but we noted that they concentrate on estimating which of the available options is the best one, implicitly neglecting the cases in which several options can be good at the same time. We explore a more general model of decision-making that instead estimates the probability that each option is good, allowing several options to be good simultaneously. This model predicts with great generality the enhanced imitation in negative situations. Fish and human behavioral data showing an increased imitation behavior in negative circumstances are well described by this type of decisions to choose a good option. △ Less

Submitted 28 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: To appear in the proceedings of Collective Intelligence 2014 (Boston, June 10-12) The work regarding this document is in progress. Updates expected

A Model of Decision-Making in Groups of Humans

Authors: Gabriel Madirolas, Alfonso Perez-Escudero, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja

Abstract: Decisions by humans depend on their estimations given some uncertain sensory data. These decisions can also be influenced by the behavior of others. Here we present a mathematical model to quantify this influence, inviting a further study on the cognitive consequences of social information. We also expect that the present model can be used for a better understanding of the neural circuits implicat… ▽ More Decisions by humans depend on their estimations given some uncertain sensory data. These decisions can also be influenced by the behavior of others. Here we present a mathematical model to quantify this influence, inviting a further study on the cognitive consequences of social information. We also expect that the present model can be used for a better understanding of the neural circuits implicated in social processing. △ Less

Submitted 24 September, 2012; originally announced September 2012.

A common rule for decision-making in animal collectives across species

Authors: Sara Arganda, Alfonso Pérez-Escudero, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja

Abstract: A diversity of decision-making systems has been observed in animal collectives. In some species, choices depend on the differences of the numbers of animals that have chosen each of the available options, while in other species on the relative differences (a behavior known as Weber's law) or follow more complex rules. We here show that this diversity of decision systems corresponds to a single rul… ▽ More A diversity of decision-making systems has been observed in animal collectives. In some species, choices depend on the differences of the numbers of animals that have chosen each of the available options, while in other species on the relative differences (a behavior known as Weber's law) or follow more complex rules. We here show that this diversity of decision systems corresponds to a single rule of decision-making in collectives. We first obtained a decision rule based on Bayesian estimation that uses the information provided by the behaviors of the other individuals to improve the estimation of the structure of the world. We then tested this rule in decision experiments using zebrafish (Danio rerio), and in existing rich datasets of argentine ants (Linepithema humile) and sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), showing that a unified model across species can quantitatively explain the diversity of decision systems. Further, these results show that the different counting systems used by animals, including humans, can emerge from the common principle of using social information to make good decisions. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2012; v1 submitted 14 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Journal ref: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA vol. 109 no. 50 20508-20513 (2012)

Collective Animal Behavior from Bayesian Estimation and Probability Matching

Authors: Alfonso Pérez-Escudero, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja

Abstract: Animals living in groups make movement decisions that depend, among other factors, on social interactions with other group members. Our present understanding of social rules in animal collectives is mainly based on empirical fits to observations, with less emphasis in obtaining first-principles approaches that allow their derivation. Here we show that patterns of collective decisions can be derive… ▽ More Animals living in groups make movement decisions that depend, among other factors, on social interactions with other group members. Our present understanding of social rules in animal collectives is mainly based on empirical fits to observations, with less emphasis in obtaining first-principles approaches that allow their derivation. Here we show that patterns of collective decisions can be derived from the basic ability of animals to make probabilistic estimations in the presence of uncertainty. We build a decision-making model with two stages: Bayesian estimation and probabilistic matching. In the first stage, each animal makes a Bayesian estimation of which behavior is best to perform taking into account personal information about the environment and social information collected by observing the behaviors of other animals. In the probability matching stage, each animal chooses a behavior with a probability equal to the Bayesian-estimated probability that this behavior is the most appropriate one. This model derives very simple rules of interaction in animal collectives that depend only on two types of reliability parameters, one that each animal assigns to the other animals and another given by the quality of the non-social information. We test our model by obtaining theoretically a rich set of observed collective patterns of decisions in three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, a shoaling fish species. The quantitative link shown between probabilistic estimation and collective rules of behavior allows a better contact with other fields such as foraging, mate selection, neurobiology and psychology, and gives predictions for experiments directly testing the relationship between estimation and collective behavior. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2011; v1 submitted 5 May, 2011; originally announced May 2011.

Comments: 19 pages, including Supplemental Figures and Supplemental Text. In press in PLoS Computational Biology

Journal ref: PLoS Comput Biol 7(11): e1002282 (2011)

An artifact in fits to conic-based surfaces

Authors: Alfonso Pérez-Escudero, Carlos Dorronsoro, Susana Marcos

Abstract: It is common in Physiological Optics to fit the corneal and the lens surfaces to conic-based surfaces (usually ellipse-based surfaces), obtaining their characteristic radius of curvature and asphericity. Here we show that the variation in radius and asphericity due to experimental noise is strongly correlated. This correlation is seen both in experimental data of the corneal topographer Pentacam… ▽ More It is common in Physiological Optics to fit the corneal and the lens surfaces to conic-based surfaces (usually ellipse-based surfaces), obtaining their characteristic radius of curvature and asphericity. Here we show that the variation in radius and asphericity due to experimental noise is strongly correlated. This correlation is seen both in experimental data of the corneal topographer Pentacam and in simulations. We also show that the effect is a characteristic of the geometry of ellipses, and not restricted to any experimental device or fitting procedure. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2009; originally announced May 2009.

Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures

Journal ref: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2010 Jul 1;27(7):1541-8