Activate index: an integrated index to reveal disrupted brain network organizations of major depressive disorder patients
Authors:
Yu Fu,
Yanyan Huang,
Meng Niu,
Le Xue,
Shunjie Dong,
Shunlin Guo,
Junqiang Lei,
Cheng Zhuo
Abstract:
Altered functional brain networks have been a typical manifestation that distinguishes major depressive disorder (MDD) patients from healthy control (HC) subjects in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. Recently, rich club and diverse club metrics have been proposed for network or network neuroscience analyses. The rich club defines a set of nodes that tend to be the hubs of speci…
▽ More
Altered functional brain networks have been a typical manifestation that distinguishes major depressive disorder (MDD) patients from healthy control (HC) subjects in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. Recently, rich club and diverse club metrics have been proposed for network or network neuroscience analyses. The rich club defines a set of nodes that tend to be the hubs of specific communities, and the diverse club defines the nodes that span more communities and have edges diversely distributed across different communities. Considering the heterogeneity of rich clubs and diverse clubs, combining them and on the basis to derive a novel indicator may reveal new evidence of brain functional integration and separation, which might provide new insights into MDD. This study for the first time discussed the differences between MDD and HC using both rich club and diverse club metrics and found the complementarity of them in analyzing brain networks. Besides, a novel index, termed "active index", has been proposed in this study. The active index defines a group of nodes that tend to be diversely distributed across communities while avoiding being a hub of a community. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of active index in analyzing MDD brain mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
Modelling group dynamic animal movement
Authors:
Roland Langrock,
J. Grant C. Hopcraft,
Paul G. Blackwell,
Victoria Goodall,
Ruth King,
Mu Niu,
Toby A. Patterson,
Martin W. Pedersen,
Anna Skarin,
Robert S. Schick
Abstract:
Group dynamic movement is a fundamental aspect of many species' movements. The need to adequately model individuals' interactions with other group members has been recognised, particularly in order to differentiate the role of social forces in individual movement from environmental factors. However, to date, practical statistical methods which can include group dynamics in animal movement models h…
▽ More
Group dynamic movement is a fundamental aspect of many species' movements. The need to adequately model individuals' interactions with other group members has been recognised, particularly in order to differentiate the role of social forces in individual movement from environmental factors. However, to date, practical statistical methods which can include group dynamics in animal movement models have been lacking. We consider a flexible modelling framework that distinguishes a group-level model, describing the movement of the group's centre, and an individual-level model, such that each individual makes its movement decisions relative to the group centroid. The basic idea is framed within the flexible class of hidden Markov models, extending previous work on modelling animal movement by means of multi-state random walks. While in simulation experiments parameter estimators exhibit some bias in non-ideal scenarios, we show that generally the estimation of models of this type is both feasible and ecologically informative. We illustrate the approach using real movement data from 11 reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Results indicate a directional bias towards a group centroid for reindeer in an encamped state. Though the attraction to the group centroid is relatively weak, our model successfully captures group-influenced movement dynamics. Specifically, as compared to a regular mixture of correlated random walks, the group dynamic model more accurately predicts the non-diffusive behaviour of a cohesive mobile group.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
