-
FOSS solution for Molecular Dynamics Simulation Automation and Collaboration with MDSGAT
Authors:
Jai Geddes Nelson,
Xiaochen Liu,
Ken Tye Yong
Abstract:
The process of setting up and successfully running Molecular Dynamics Simulations (MDS) is outlined to be incredibly labour and computationally expensive with a very high barrier to entry for newcomers wishing to utilise the benefits and insights of MDS. Here, presented, is a unique Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS) solution that aims to not only reduce the barrier of entry for new Molecular Dy…
▽ More
The process of setting up and successfully running Molecular Dynamics Simulations (MDS) is outlined to be incredibly labour and computationally expensive with a very high barrier to entry for newcomers wishing to utilise the benefits and insights of MDS. Here, presented, is a unique Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS) solution that aims to not only reduce the barrier of entry for new Molecular Dynamics (MD) users, but also significantly reduce the setup time and hardware utilisation overhead for even highly experienced MD researchers. This is accomplished through the creation of the Molecular Dynamics Simulation Generator and Analysis Tool (MDSGAT) which currently serves as a viable alternative to other restrictive or privatised MDS Graphical solutions with a unique design that allows for seamless collaboration and distribution of exact MD simulation setups and initialisation parameters through a single setup file. This solution is designed from the start with a modular mindset allowing for additional software expansion to incorporate numerous extra MDS packages and analysis methods over time
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2025; v1 submitted 6 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Harmonizing the Generation and Pre-publication Stewardship of FAIR Image Data
Authors:
Nikki Bialy,
Frank Alber,
Brenda Andrews,
Michael Angelo,
Brian Beliveau,
Lacramioara Bintu,
Alistair Boettiger,
Ulrike Boehm,
Claire M. Brown,
Mahmoud Bukar Maina,
James J. Chambers,
Beth A. Cimini,
Kevin Eliceiri,
Rachel Errington,
Orestis Faklaris,
Nathalie Gaudreault,
Ronald N. Germain,
Wojtek Goscinski,
David Grunwald,
Michael Halter,
Dorit Hanein,
John W. Hickey,
Judith Lacoste,
Alex Laude,
Emma Lundberg
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Together with the molecular knowledge of genes and proteins, biological images promise to significantly enhance the scientific understanding of complex cellular systems and to advance predictive and personalized therapeutic products for human health. For this potential to be realized, quality-assured image data must be shared among labs at a global scale to be compared, pooled, and reanalyzed, thu…
▽ More
Together with the molecular knowledge of genes and proteins, biological images promise to significantly enhance the scientific understanding of complex cellular systems and to advance predictive and personalized therapeutic products for human health. For this potential to be realized, quality-assured image data must be shared among labs at a global scale to be compared, pooled, and reanalyzed, thus unleashing untold potential beyond the original purpose for which the data was generated. There are two broad sets of requirements to enable image data sharing in the life sciences. One set of requirements is articulated in the companion White Paper entitled Enabling Global Image Data Sharing in the Life Sciences, which is published in parallel and addresses the need to build the cyberinfrastructure for sharing the digital array data. In this White Paper, we detail a broad set of requirements, which involves collecting, managing, presenting, and propagating contextual information essential to assess the quality, understand the content, interpret the scientific implications, and reuse image data in the context of the experimental details. We start by providing an overview of the main lessons learned to date through international community activities, which have recently made considerable progress toward generating community standard practices for imaging Quality Control (QC) and metadata. We then provide a clear set of recommendations for amplifying this work. The driving goal is to address remaining challenges and democratize access to everyday practices and tools for a spectrum of biomedical researchers, regardless of their expertise, access to resources, and geographical location.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2024; v1 submitted 23 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy
Authors:
Glyn Nelson,
Ulrike Boehm,
Steve Bagley,
Peter Bajcsy,
Johanna Bischof,
Claire M Brown,
Aurelien Dauphin,
Ian M Dobbie,
John E Eriksson,
Orestis Faklaris,
Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez,
Alexia Ferrand,
Laurent Gelman,
Ali Gheisari,
Hella Hartmann,
Christian Kukat,
Alex Laude,
Miso Mitkovski,
Sebastian Munck,
Alison J North,
Tobias M Rasse,
Ute Resch-Genger,
Lucas C Schuetz,
Arne Seitz,
Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia
, et al. (75 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for Instruments and Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal…
▽ More
In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for Instruments and Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models, and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper 1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; 2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers, and observers of such; 3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative, and 4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2021; v1 submitted 21 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Interpretation of Confocal ISO 21073: 2019 confocal microscopes: Optical data of fluorescence confocal microscopes for biological imaging- Recommended Methodology for Quality Control
Authors:
Glyn Nelson,
Laurent Gelman,
Orestis Faklaris,
Roland Nitschke,
Alex Laude
Abstract:
The performance of a confocal imaging system may be no better than a general-purpose widefield system if it is not properly maintained or quality controlled. The publication of ISO 21073, 'Confocal microscopes- Optical data of fluorescence confocal microscopes for biological imaging', set a standard for the minimal Quality Control (QC) that should be performed for Confocal Microscopes. Here we des…
▽ More
The performance of a confocal imaging system may be no better than a general-purpose widefield system if it is not properly maintained or quality controlled. The publication of ISO 21073, 'Confocal microscopes- Optical data of fluorescence confocal microscopes for biological imaging', set a standard for the minimal Quality Control (QC) that should be performed for Confocal Microscopes. Here we describe methodology for performing the QC requirements to satisfy ISO 21073, as well as suggesting other QC methods that should be performed to obtain a minimum level of information about the microscope system.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2020; v1 submitted 17 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
A perspective on Microscopy Metadata: data provenance and quality control
Authors:
Maximiliaan Huisman,
Mathias Hammer,
Alex Rigano,
Ulrike Boehm,
James J. Chambers,
Nathalie Gaudreault,
Alison J. North,
Jaime A. Pimentel,
Damir Sudar,
Peter Bajcsy,
Claire M. Brown,
Alexander D. Corbett,
Orestis Faklaris,
Judith Lacoste,
Alex Laude,
Glyn Nelson,
Roland Nitschke,
David Grunwald,
Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia
Abstract:
The application of microscopy in biomedical research has come a long way since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered unicellular organisms. Countless innovations have positioned light microscopy as a cornerstone of modern biology and a method of choice for connecting omics datasets to their biological and clinical correlates. Still, regardless of how convincing published imaging data looks, it does n…
▽ More
The application of microscopy in biomedical research has come a long way since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered unicellular organisms. Countless innovations have positioned light microscopy as a cornerstone of modern biology and a method of choice for connecting omics datasets to their biological and clinical correlates. Still, regardless of how convincing published imaging data looks, it does not always convey meaningful information about the conditions in which it was acquired, processed, and analyzed. Adequate record-keeping, reporting, and quality control are therefore essential to ensure experimental rigor and data fidelity, allow experiments to be reproducibly repeated, and promote the proper evaluation, interpretation, comparison, and re-use. To this end, microscopy images should be accompanied by complete descriptions detailing experimental procedures, biological samples, microscope hardware specifications, image acquisition parameters, and image analysis procedures, as well as metrics accounting for instrument performance and calibration. However, universal, community-accepted Microscopy Metadata standards and reporting specifications that would result in Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reproducible (FAIR) microscopy data have not yet been established. To understand this shortcoming and to propose a way forward, here we provide an overview of the nature of microscopy metadata and its importance for fostering data quality, reproducibility, scientific rigor, and sharing value in light microscopy. The proposal for tiered Microscopy Metadata Specifications that extend the OME Data Model put forth by the 4D Nucleome Initiative and by Bioimaging North America [1-3] as well as a suite of three complementary and interoperable tools are being developed to facilitate the process of image data documentation and are presented in related manuscripts [4-6].
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2021; v1 submitted 24 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
