A systematic review of guidelines for the use of race, ethnicity, and ancestry reveals widespread consensus but also points of ongoing disagreement
Authors:
Madelyn Mauro,
Danielle S. Allen,
Bege Dauda,
Santiago J. Molina,
Benjamin M. Neale,
Anna C. F. Lewis
Abstract:
The use of population descriptors like race, ethnicity, and ancestry in science, medicine and public health has a long, complicated, and at times dark history, particularly for genetics, given the field's perceived importance for understanding between-group differences. The historical and potential harms that come with irresponsible use of these categories suggests a clear need for definitive guid…
▽ More
The use of population descriptors like race, ethnicity, and ancestry in science, medicine and public health has a long, complicated, and at times dark history, particularly for genetics, given the field's perceived importance for understanding between-group differences. The historical and potential harms that come with irresponsible use of these categories suggests a clear need for definitive guidance about when and how they can be used appropriately. However, while many prior authors have provided such guidance, no established consensus exists, and the extant literature has not been examined for implied consensus and sources of disagreement. Here we present the results of a systematic review of published normative recommendations regarding the use of population categories, particularly in genetics research. Following PRISMA guidelines, we extracted recommendations from n=121 articles matching inclusion criteria. Articles were published consistently throughout the time period examined and in a broad range of journals, demonstrating an ongoing and interdisciplinary perceived need for guidance. Examined recommendations fall under one of eight themes identified during analysis. Seven are characterized by broad agreement across articles; one, Appropriate definitions of population categories and contexts for use, revealed substantial fundamental disagreement among articles. While many articles focus on the inappropriate use of race, none fundamentally problematize ancestry. This work can be a resource to researchers looking for normative guidance on the use of population descriptors, and can orient authors of future guidelines to this complex field, contributing to the development of more effective future guidelines for genetics research.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
Getting Genetic Ancestry Right for Science and Society
Authors:
Anna C. F. Lewis,
Santiago J. Molina,
Paul S Appelbaum,
Bege Dauda,
Anna Di Rienzo,
Agustin Fuentes,
Stephanie M. Fullerton,
Nanibaa' A. Garrison,
Nayanika Ghosh,
Evelynn M. Hammonds,
David S. Jones,
Eimear E. Kenny,
Peter Kraft,
Sandra S. -J. Lee,
Madelyn Mauro,
John Novembre,
Aaron Panofsky,
Mashaal Sohail,
Benjamin M. Neale,
Danielle S. Allen
Abstract:
There is a scientific and ethical imperative to embrace a multidimensional, continuous view of ancestry and move away from continental ancestry categories
There is a scientific and ethical imperative to embrace a multidimensional, continuous view of ancestry and move away from continental ancestry categories
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2021; v1 submitted 12 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
