Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Kellmeyer, P

Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights'

Authors: Sjors Ligthart, Marcello Ienca, Gerben Meynen, Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor, Roberto Andorno, Christoph Bublitz, Paul Catley, Lisa Claydon, Thomas Douglas, Nita Farahany, Joseph J. Fins, Sara Goering, Pim Haselager, Fabrice Jotterand, Andrea Lavazza, Allan McCay, Abel Wajnerman Paz, Stephen Rainey, Jesper Ryberg, Philipp Kellmeyer

Abstract: The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as 'neurorights' in ethical, legal and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including 'neurorights' into their constitutional legal frameworks and internati… ▽ More The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as 'neurorights' in ethical, legal and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including 'neurorights' into their constitutional legal frameworks and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of 'neurorights' the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or are in conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work here is to provide conceptual, ethical and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal and policy discussions. △ Less

Submitted 20 March, 2023; v1 submitted 13 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Neurofeminism: feminist critiques of research on sex/gender differences in the neurosciences

Authors: Kassandra Friedrichs, Philipp Kellmeyer

Abstract: Over the last three decades, the human brain, and its role in determining behavior have been receiving a growing amount of attention in academia as well as in society more generally. Neuroscientific explanations of human behavior or other phenomena are often especially appealing to lay people. Therefore, neuroscientific explanations that can affect individuals, groups, or social relations in gener… ▽ More Over the last three decades, the human brain, and its role in determining behavior have been receiving a growing amount of attention in academia as well as in society more generally. Neuroscientific explanations of human behavior or other phenomena are often especially appealing to lay people. Therefore, neuroscientific explanations that can affect individuals, groups, or social relations in general should be formulated in a careful and responsible way. One field in which especially feminist scholars request more caution is the neuroscientific examination of sex or gender differences. Feminist scholars have described various ways in which sexist bias might be present in neuroscientific research on sex or gender differences. In this context, they coined the term "neurosexism" to describe the entanglement between neuroscientific work and sexist ideology, and "neurofeminism" as a response to that. Here, we aim to give an overview over the contemporary neurofeminist literature. In the first part, common levels of analysis in the neurofeminist literature are presented and the research level is explored in more detail. In the second part, some common developments in more recent neurofeminist scholarship are discussed. For this, we review recent publications with the aim to provide neuroscientists with a solid understanding of neurofeminist criticism so that they may evaluate neuroscientific claims about on sex or gender differences from this critical perspective. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

The spatial scale dimension of speech processing in the human brain

Authors: Philipp Kellmeyer, Roland Berkemeier, Tonio Ball

Abstract: In the past three decades, neuroimaging has provided important insights into structure-function relationships in the human brain. Recently, however, the methods for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data have come under scrutiny, with studies questioning cross-software comparability, the validity of statistical inference and interpretation, and the influence of the spatial fil… ▽ More In the past three decades, neuroimaging has provided important insights into structure-function relationships in the human brain. Recently, however, the methods for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data have come under scrutiny, with studies questioning cross-software comparability, the validity of statistical inference and interpretation, and the influence of the spatial filter size on neuroimaging analyses. As most fMRI studies only use a single filter for analysis, much information on the size and shape of the BOLD signal in Gaussian scale space remains hidden and constrains the interpretation of fMRI studies. To investigate the influence of the spatial observation scale on fMRI analysis, we use a spatial multiscale analysis with a range of Gaussian filters from 1-20 mm (full width at half maximum) to analyze fMRI data from a speech repetition paradigm in 25 healthy subjects. We show that analyzing the fMRI data over a range of Gaussian filter kernels reveals substantial variability in the neuroanatomical localization and the average signal strength and size of suprathreshold clusters depending on the filter size. We also demonstrate how small spatial filters bias the results towards subcortical and cerebellar clusters. Furthermore, we describe substantially different scale-dependent cluster size dynamics between cortical and cerebellar clusters. We discuss how spatial multiscale analysis may substantially improve the interpretation of fMRI data. We propose to further develop a spatial multiscale analysis to fully explore the deep structure of the BOLD signal in Gaussian scale space. △ Less

Submitted 19 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Towards a Governance Framework for Brain Data

Authors: Marcello Ienca, Joseph J. Fins, Ralf J. Jox, Fabrice Jotterand, Silja Voeneky, Roberto Andorno, Tonio Ball, Claude Castelluccia, Ricardo Chavarriaga, Hervé Chneiweiss, Agata Ferretti, Orsolya Friedrich, Samia Hurst, Grischa Merkel, Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor, Jean-Marc Rickli, James Scheibner, Effy Vayena, Rafael Yuste, Philipp Kellmeyer

Abstract: The increasing availability of brain data within and outside the biomedical field, combined with the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to brain data analysis, poses a challenge for ethics and governance. We identify distinctive ethical implications of brain data acquisition and processing, and outline a multi-level governance framework. This framework is aimed at maximizing the benefits… ▽ More The increasing availability of brain data within and outside the biomedical field, combined with the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to brain data analysis, poses a challenge for ethics and governance. We identify distinctive ethical implications of brain data acquisition and processing, and outline a multi-level governance framework. This framework is aimed at maximizing the benefits of facilitated brain data collection and further processing for science and medicine whilst minimizing risks and preventing harmful use. The framework consists of four primary areas of regulatory intervention: binding regulation, ethics and soft law, responsible innovation, and human rights. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2021; v1 submitted 24 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.