-
In search for an alternative to the computer metaphor of the mind and brain
Authors:
Damian G. Kelty-Stephen,
Paul E. Cisek,
Benjamin De Bari,
James Dixon,
Luis H. Favela,
Fred Hasselman,
Fred Keijzer,
Vicente Raja,
Jeffrey B. Wagman,
Brandon J. Thomas,
Madhur Mangalam
Abstract:
The brain-as-computer metaphor has anchored the professed computational nature of the mind, wresting it down from the intangible logic of Platonic philosophy to a material basis for empirical science. However, as with many long-lasting metaphors in science, the computer metaphor has been explored and stretched long enough to reveal its boundaries. These boundaries highlight widening gaps in our un…
▽ More
The brain-as-computer metaphor has anchored the professed computational nature of the mind, wresting it down from the intangible logic of Platonic philosophy to a material basis for empirical science. However, as with many long-lasting metaphors in science, the computer metaphor has been explored and stretched long enough to reveal its boundaries. These boundaries highlight widening gaps in our understanding of the brain's role in an organism's goal-directed, intelligent behaviors and thoughts. In search of a more appropriate metaphor that reflects the potentially noncomputable functions of mind and brain, eight author groups answer the following questions: (1) What do we understand by the computer metaphor of the brain and cognition? (2) What are some of the limitations of this computer metaphor? (3) What metaphor should replace the computational metaphor? (4) What findings support alternative metaphors? Despite agreeing about feeling the strain of the strictures of computer metaphors, the authors suggest an exciting diversity of possible metaphoric options for future research into the mind and brain.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Short and random: Modelling the effects of (proto-)neural elongations
Authors:
Oltman O. de Wiljes,
Ronald A. J. van Elburg,
Fred A. Keijzer
Abstract:
To understand how neurons and nervous systems first evolved, we need an account of the origins of neural elongations: Why did neural elongations (axons and dendrites) first originate, such that they could become the central component of both neurons and nervous systems? Two contrasting conceptual accounts provide different answers to this question. Braitenberg's vehicles provide the iconic illustr…
▽ More
To understand how neurons and nervous systems first evolved, we need an account of the origins of neural elongations: Why did neural elongations (axons and dendrites) first originate, such that they could become the central component of both neurons and nervous systems? Two contrasting conceptual accounts provide different answers to this question. Braitenberg's vehicles provide the iconic illustration of the dominant input-output (IO) view. Here the basic role of neural elongations is to connect sensors to effectors, both situated at different positions within the body. For this function, neural elongations are thought of as comparatively long and specific connections, which require an articulated body involving substantial developmental processes to build. Internal coordination (IC) models stress a different function for early nervous systems. Here the coordination of activity across extended parts of a multicellular body is held central, in particular for the contractions of (muscle) tissue. An IC perspective allows the hypothesis that the earliest proto-neural elongations could have been functional even when they were initially simple short and random connections, as long as they enhanced the patterning of contractile activity across a multicellular surface. The present computational study provides a proof of concept that such short and random neural elongations can play this role. While an excitable epithelium can generate basic forms of patterning for small body-configurations, adding elongations allows such patterning to scale up to larger bodies. This result supports a new, more gradual evolutionary route towards the origins of the very first full neurons and nervous systems.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
A Behavioural Perspective on the Early Evolution of Nervous Systems: A Computational Model of Excitable Myoepithelia
Authors:
Ronald A. J. van Elburg,
Oltman O. de Wiljes,
Michael Biehl,
Fred A. Keijzer
Abstract:
How the very first nervous systems evolved remains a fundamental open question. Molecular and genomic techniques have revolutionized our knowledge of the molecular ingredients behind this transition but not yet provided a clear picture of the morphological and tissue changes involved. Here we focus on a behavioural perspective that centres on movement by muscle contraction. Building on the finding…
▽ More
How the very first nervous systems evolved remains a fundamental open question. Molecular and genomic techniques have revolutionized our knowledge of the molecular ingredients behind this transition but not yet provided a clear picture of the morphological and tissue changes involved. Here we focus on a behavioural perspective that centres on movement by muscle contraction. Building on the finding that molecules for chemical neural signalling predate multicellular animals, we investigate a gradual evolutionary scenario for nervous systems that consists of two stages: A) Chemically transmission of electrical activity between adjacent cells provided a primitive form of muscle coordination in a contractile epithelial tissue. B) This primitive form of coordination was subsequently improved upon by evolving the axodendritic processes of modern neurons. We use computer simulations to investigate the first stage. The simulations show that chemical transmission across a contractile sheet can indeed produce useful body scale patterns, but only for small-sized animals. For larger animals the noise in chemical neural signalling interferes. Our results imply that a two-stage scenario is a viable approach to nervous system evolution. The first stage could provide an initial behavioural advantage, as well as a clear scaffold for subsequent improvements in behavioural coordination.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
