-
From FAIR to CURE: Guidelines for Computational Models of Biological Systems
Authors:
Herbert M. Sauro,
Eran Agmon,
Michael L. Blinov,
John H. Gennari,
Joe Hellerstein,
Adel Heydarabadipour,
Peter Hunter,
Bartholomew E. Jardine,
Elebeoba May,
David P. Nickerson,
Lucian P. Smith,
Gary D Bader,
Frank Bergmann,
Patrick M. Boyle,
Andreas Drager,
James R. Faeder,
Song Feng,
Juliana Freire,
Fabian Frohlich,
James A. Glazier,
Thomas E. Gorochowski,
Tomas Helikar,
Stefan Hoops,
Princess Imoukhuede,
Sarah M. Keating
, et al. (26 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Guidelines for managing scientific data have been established under the FAIR principles requiring that data be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. In many scientific disciplines, especially computational biology, both data and models are key to progress. For this reason, and recognizing that such models are a very special type of 'data', we argue that computational models, especiall…
▽ More
Guidelines for managing scientific data have been established under the FAIR principles requiring that data be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. In many scientific disciplines, especially computational biology, both data and models are key to progress. For this reason, and recognizing that such models are a very special type of 'data', we argue that computational models, especially mechanistic models prevalent in medicine, physiology and systems biology, deserve a complementary set of guidelines. We propose the CURE principles, emphasizing that models should be Credible, Understandable, Reproducible, and Extensible. We delve into each principle, discussing verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification for model credibility; the clarity of model descriptions and annotations for understandability; adherence to standards and open science practices for reproducibility; and the use of open standards and modular code for extensibility and reuse. We outline recommended and baseline requirements for each aspect of CURE, aiming to enhance the impact and trustworthiness of computational models, particularly in biomedical applications where credibility is paramount. Our perspective underscores the need for a more disciplined approach to modeling, aligning with emerging trends such as Digital Twins and emphasizing the importance of data and modeling standards for interoperability and reuse. Finally, we emphasize that given the non-trivial effort required to implement the guidelines, the community moves to automate as many of the guidelines as possible.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Adapting Modeling and Simulation Credibility Standards to Computational Systems Biology
Authors:
Lillian T. Tatka,
Lucian P. Smith,
Joseph L. Hellerstein,
Herbert M. Sauro
Abstract:
Computational models are increasingly used in high-impact decision making in science, engineering, and medicine. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) uses computational models to perform complex experiments that are otherwise prohibitively expensive or require a microgravity environment. Similarly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have…
▽ More
Computational models are increasingly used in high-impact decision making in science, engineering, and medicine. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) uses computational models to perform complex experiments that are otherwise prohibitively expensive or require a microgravity environment. Similarly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have began accepting models and simulations as form of evidence for pharmaceutical and medical device approval. It is crucial that computational models meet a standard of credibility when using them in high-stakes decision making. For this reason, institutes including NASA, the FDA, and the EMA have developed standards to promote and assess the credibility of computational models and simulations. However, due to the breadth of models these institutes assess, these credibility standards are mostly qualitative and avoid making specific recommendations. On the other hand, modeling and simulation in systems biology is a narrow domain and several standards are already in place. As systems biology models increase in complexity and influence, the development of a credibility assessment system is crucial. Here we review existing standards in systems biology, credibility standards in other science, engineering, and medical fields, and propose the development of a credibility standard for systems biology models.
△ Less
Submitted 14 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
BioSimulators: a central registry of simulation engines and services for recommending specific tools
Authors:
Bilal Shaikh,
Lucian P. Smith,
Dan Vasilescu,
Gnaneswara Marupilla,
Michael Wilson,
Eran Agmon,
Henry Agnew,
Steven S. Andrews,
Azraf Anwar,
Moritz E. Beber,
Frank T. Bergmann,
David Brooks,
Lutz Brusch,
Laurence Calzone,
Kiri Choi,
Joshua Cooper,
John Detloff,
Brian Drawert,
Michel Dumontier,
G. Bard Ermentrout,
James R. Faeder,
Andrew P. Freiburger,
Fabian Fröhlich,
Akira Funahashi,
Alan Garny
, et al. (46 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Computational models have great potential to accelerate bioscience, bioengineering, and medicine. However, it remains challenging to reproduce and reuse simulations, in part, because the numerous formats and methods for simulating various subsystems and scales remain siloed by different software tools. For example, each tool must be executed through a distinct interface. To help investigators find…
▽ More
Computational models have great potential to accelerate bioscience, bioengineering, and medicine. However, it remains challenging to reproduce and reuse simulations, in part, because the numerous formats and methods for simulating various subsystems and scales remain siloed by different software tools. For example, each tool must be executed through a distinct interface. To help investigators find and use simulation tools, we developed BioSimulators (https://biosimulators.org), a central registry of the capabilities of simulation tools and consistent Python, command-line, and containerized interfaces to each version of each tool. The foundation of BioSimulators is standards, such as CellML, SBML, SED-ML, and the COMBINE archive format, and validation tools for simulation projects and simulation tools that ensure these standards are used consistently. To help modelers find tools for particular projects, we have also used the registry to develop recommendation services. We anticipate that BioSimulators will help modelers exchange, reproduce, and combine simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
