-
A General Optimal Control Model of Human Movement Patterns II: Rapid, Targeted Hand Movements (Fitts Law)
Authors:
Stuart Hagler
Abstract:
Rapid, targeted hand movements exhibit a regular movement pattern described by Fitts law. We develop a model of these movements in which this movement pattern results from an optimal control model describing rapid hand movements and a utility model describing the speed/accuracy trade-off between moving the hand rapidly to the target and hitting the target accurately. The optimal control model is c…
▽ More
Rapid, targeted hand movements exhibit a regular movement pattern described by Fitts law. We develop a model of these movements in which this movement pattern results from an optimal control model describing rapid hand movements and a utility model describing the speed/accuracy trade-off between moving the hand rapidly to the target and hitting the target accurately. The optimal control model is constructed using principled approach in which we forbid the muscle forces to exhibit any discontinuities and require the cost to be expressed in terms of a psychophysical representation of the movement. This yields a yank-control or jerk-control model of the movement which exhibits two constants of the motion that are closely related to the energy and momentum in classical mechanics. We force the optimal control model to obey Fitts law by requiring a particular relationship hold between the constants of the motion and the size of the target and show that the resulting model compares well to a standard expression of Fitts law obtained empirically using observations of computer mouse movements. We then proceed to further show how this relationship may be obtained as the result of a simple models of the movement accuracy and the speed/accuracy trade-off. We use the movement accuracy model to analyze observed differences in computer mouse movement patterns between older adults with mild cognitive impairment and intact older adults. We conclude by looking at how a subject might carry out in practice the optimization implicit in resolving the speed/accuracy trade-off in our model.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 25 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
A General Optimal Control Model of Human Movement Patterns I: Walking Gait
Authors:
Stuart Hagler
Abstract:
The biomechanics of the human body gives subjects a high degree of freedom in how they can execute movement. Nevertheless, subjects exhibit regularity in their movement patterns. One way to account for this regularity is to suppose that subjects select movement trajectories that are optimal in some sense. We adopt the principle that human movements are optimal and develop a general model for human…
▽ More
The biomechanics of the human body gives subjects a high degree of freedom in how they can execute movement. Nevertheless, subjects exhibit regularity in their movement patterns. One way to account for this regularity is to suppose that subjects select movement trajectories that are optimal in some sense. We adopt the principle that human movements are optimal and develop a general model for human movement patters that uses variational methods in the form of optimal control theory to calculate trajectories of movement trajectories of the body. We find that in this approach a constant of the motion that arises from the model and which plays a role in the optimal control model that is analogous to the role that the mechanical energy plays in classical physics. We illustrate how this approach works in practice by using it to develop a model of walking gait, making all the derivations and calculations in detail. We finally show that this optimal control model of walking gait recovers in an appropriate limit an existing model of walking gait which has been shown to provide good estimates of many observed characteristics of walking gait.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 16 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Patterns of Selection of Human Movements IV: Energy Efficiency, Mechanical Advantage, and Asynchronous Arm-Cranking
Authors:
Stuart Hagler
Abstract:
Human movements are physical processes combining the classical mechanics of the human body moving in space and the biomechanics of the muscles generating the forces acting on the body under sophisticated sensory-motor control. The characterization of the performance of human movements is a problem with important applications in clinical and sports research. One way to characterize movement perform…
▽ More
Human movements are physical processes combining the classical mechanics of the human body moving in space and the biomechanics of the muscles generating the forces acting on the body under sophisticated sensory-motor control. The characterization of the performance of human movements is a problem with important applications in clinical and sports research. One way to characterize movement performance is through measures of energy efficiency that relate the mechanical energy of the body and metabolic energy expended by the muscles. Such a characterization provides information about the performance of a movement insofar as subjects select movements with the aim of maximizing the energy efficiency. We examine the case of the energy efficiency of asynchronous arm-cranking doing external mechanical work, that is, using the arms to turn an asynchronous arm-crank that performs external mechanical work. We construct a metabolic energy model and use it estimate how cranking may be performed with maximum energy efficiency, and recover the intuitive result that for larger external forces the crank-handles should be placed as far from the center of the crank as is comfortable for the subject to turn. We further examine mechanical advantage in asynchronous arm-cranking by constructing an idealized system that is driven by a crank and which involves an adjustable mechanical advantage, and analyze the case in which the avg. frequency is fixed and derive the mechanical advantages that maximize energy efficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 10 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
Patterns of Selection of Human Movements III: Energy Efficiency, Mechanical Advantage, and Walking Gait
Authors:
Stuart Hagler
Abstract:
Human movements are physical processes combining the classical mechanics of the human body moving in space and the biomechanics of the muscles generating the forces acting on the body under sophisticated sensory-motor control. One way to characterize movement performance is through measures of energy efficiency that relate the mechanical energy of the body and metabolic energy expended by the musc…
▽ More
Human movements are physical processes combining the classical mechanics of the human body moving in space and the biomechanics of the muscles generating the forces acting on the body under sophisticated sensory-motor control. One way to characterize movement performance is through measures of energy efficiency that relate the mechanical energy of the body and metabolic energy expended by the muscles. We expect the practical utility of such measures to be greater when human subjects execute movements that maximize energy efficiency. We therefore seek to understand if and when subjects select movements with that maximizing energy efficiency. We proceed using a model-based approach to describe movements which perform a task requiring the body to add or remove external mechanical work to or from an object. We use the specific example of walking gaits doing external mechanical work by pulling a cart, and estimate the relationship between the avg. walking speed and avg. step length. In the limit where no external work is done, we find that the estimated maximum energy efficiency walking gait is much slower than the walking gaits healthy adults typically select. We then modify the situation of the walking gait by introducing an idealized mechanical device that creates an adjustable mechanical advantage. The walking gaits that maximize the energy efficiency using the optimal mechanical advantage are again much slower than the walking gaits healthy adults typically select. We finally modify the situation so that the avg. walking speed is fixed and derive the pattern of the avg. step length and mechanical advantage that maximize energy efficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 13 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Patterns of Selection of Human Movements II: Movement Limits, Mechanical Energy, and Very Slow Walking Gaits
Authors:
Stuart Hagler
Abstract:
The biomechanics of the human body allow humans a range of possible ways of executing movements to attain specific goals. This range of movement is limited by a number of mechanical, biomechanical, or cognitive constraints. Shifts in these limits result in changes available possible movements from which a subject can select and can affect which movements a subject selects. Therefore by understandi…
▽ More
The biomechanics of the human body allow humans a range of possible ways of executing movements to attain specific goals. This range of movement is limited by a number of mechanical, biomechanical, or cognitive constraints. Shifts in these limits result in changes available possible movements from which a subject can select and can affect which movements a subject selects. Therefore by understanding the limits on the range of movement we can come to a better understanding of declines in movement performance due to disease or aging. In this project, we look at how models for the limits on the range of movement can be derived in a principled manner from a model of the movement. Using the example of normal walking gaits, we develop a lower limit on the avg. walking speed by examining the process by which the body restores mechanical energy lost during walking, and we develop an upper limit on the avg. step length by examining the forces the body can exert doing external mechanical work, in this case, pulling a cart. Making slight changes to the model for normal walking gaits, we develop a model of very slow walking gaits with avg. walking speeds below the lower limit on normal walking gaits but that also has a lower limit on the avg. walking speed. We note that the lowest avg. walking speeds observed clinically fall into the range of very slow walking gaits so defined, and argue that forms of bipedal locomotion with still lower speeds should be considered distinct from walking gaits.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 3 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Patterns of Selection of Human Movements I: Movement Utility, Metabolic Energy, and Normal Walking Gaits
Authors:
Stuart Hagler
Abstract:
The biomechanics of the human body allow humans a range of possible ways of executing movements to attain specific goals. Nevertheless, humans exhibit significant patterns in how they execute movements. We propose that the observed patterns of human movement arise because subjects select those ways to execute movements that are, in a rigorous sense, optimal. In this project, we show how this propo…
▽ More
The biomechanics of the human body allow humans a range of possible ways of executing movements to attain specific goals. Nevertheless, humans exhibit significant patterns in how they execute movements. We propose that the observed patterns of human movement arise because subjects select those ways to execute movements that are, in a rigorous sense, optimal. In this project, we show how this proposition can guide the development of computational models of movement selection and thereby account for human movement patterns. We proceed by first developing a movement utility formalism that operationalizes the concept of a best or optimal way of executing a movement using a utility function so that the problem of movement selection becomes the problem of finding the movement that maximizes the utility function. Since the movement utility formalism includes a contribution of the metabolic energy of the movement (maximum utility movements try to minimize metabolic energy), we also develop a metabolic energy formalism that we can use to construct estimators of the metabolic energies of particular movements. We then show how we can construct an estimator for the metabolic energies of normal walking gaits and we use that estimator to construct a movement utility model of the selection of normal walking gaits and show that the relationship between avg. walking speed and avg. step length predicted by this model agrees with observation. We conclude by proposing a physical mechanism that a subject might use to estimate the metabolic energy of a movement in practice.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 11 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
Assessing Executive Function Using a Computer Game: Computational Modeling of Cognitive Processes
Authors:
Stuart Hagler,
Holly B. Jimison,
Misha Pavel
Abstract:
Early and reliable detection of cognitive decline is one of the most important challenges of current healthcare. In this project we developed an approach whereby a frequently played computer game can be used to assess a variety of cognitive processes and estimate the results of the pen-and-paper Trail-Making Test (TMT) - known to measure executive function, as well as visual pattern recognition, s…
▽ More
Early and reliable detection of cognitive decline is one of the most important challenges of current healthcare. In this project we developed an approach whereby a frequently played computer game can be used to assess a variety of cognitive processes and estimate the results of the pen-and-paper Trail-Making Test (TMT) - known to measure executive function, as well as visual pattern recognition, speed of processing, working memory, and set-switching ability. We developed a computational model of the TMT based on a decomposition of the test into several independent processes, each characterized by a set of parameters that can be estimated from play of a computer game designed to resemble the TMT. An empirical evaluation of the model suggests that it is possible to use the game data to estimate the parameters of the underlying cognitive processes and using the values of the parameters to estimate the TMT performance. Cognitive measures and trends in these measures can be used to identify individuals for further assessment, to provide a mechanism for improving the early detection of neurological problems, and to provide feedback and monitoring for cognitive interventions in the home.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Quantification of Human Movement for Assessment in Automated Exercise Coaching
Authors:
Stuart Hagler,
Holly B. Jimison,
Ruzena Bajczy,
Misha Pavel
Abstract:
Quantification of human movement is a challenge in many areas, ranging from physical therapy to robotics. We quantify of human movement for the purpose of providing automated exercise coaching in the home. We developed a model-based assessment and inference process that combines biomechanical constraints with movement assessment based on the Microsoft Kinect camera. To illustrate the approach, we…
▽ More
Quantification of human movement is a challenge in many areas, ranging from physical therapy to robotics. We quantify of human movement for the purpose of providing automated exercise coaching in the home. We developed a model-based assessment and inference process that combines biomechanical constraints with movement assessment based on the Microsoft Kinect camera. To illustrate the approach, we quantify the performance of a simple squatting exercise using two model-based metrics that are related to strength and endurance, and provide an estimate of the strength and energy-expenditure of each exercise session. We look at data for 5 subjects, and show that for some subjects the metrics indicate a trend consistent with improved exercise performance.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
On the Principled Description of Human Movements
Authors:
Stuart Hagler
Abstract:
While the use of technology to provide accurate and objective measurements of human movement performance is presently an area of great interest, efforts to quantify the performance of movement are hampered by the lack of a principled model that describes how a subject goes about making a movement. We put forward a principled mathematical formalism that describes human movements using an optimal co…
▽ More
While the use of technology to provide accurate and objective measurements of human movement performance is presently an area of great interest, efforts to quantify the performance of movement are hampered by the lack of a principled model that describes how a subject goes about making a movement. We put forward a principled mathematical formalism that describes human movements using an optimal control model in which the subject controls the jerk of the movement. We construct the formalism by assuming that the movement a subject chooses to make is better than the alternatives. We quantify the relative quality of movements mathematically by specifying a cost functional that assigns a numerical value to every possible movement; the subject makes the movement that minimizes the cost functional. We develop the mathematical structure of movements that minimize a cost functional, and observe that this development parallels the development of analytical mechanics from the Principle of Least Action. We derive a constant of the motion for human movements that plays a role that is analogous to the role that the energy plays in classical mechanics. We apply the formalism to the description of two movements: (1) rapid, targeted movements of a computer mouse, and (2) finger-tapping, and show that the constant of the motion that we have derived provides a useful value with which we can characterize the performance of the movements. In the case of rapid, targeted movements of a computer mouse, we show how the model of human movement that we have developed can be made to agree with Fitts' law, and we show how Fitts' law is related to the constant of the motion that we have derived. We finally show that solutions exist within the model of human movements that exhibit an oscillatory character reminiscent of tremor.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 22 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
