BioNeMo Framework: a modular, high-performance library for AI model development in drug discovery
Authors:
Peter St. John,
Dejun Lin,
Polina Binder,
Malcolm Greaves,
Vega Shah,
John St. John,
Adrian Lange,
Patrick Hsu,
Rajesh Illango,
Arvind Ramanathan,
Anima Anandkumar,
David H Brookes,
Akosua Busia,
Abhishaike Mahajan,
Stephen Malina,
Neha Prasad,
Sam Sinai,
Lindsay Edwards,
Thomas Gaudelet,
Cristian Regep,
Martin Steinegger,
Burkhard Rost,
Alexander Brace,
Kyle Hippe,
Luca Naef
, et al. (63 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Artificial Intelligence models encoding biology and chemistry are opening new routes to high-throughput and high-quality in-silico drug development. However, their training increasingly relies on computational scale, with recent protein language models (pLM) training on hundreds of graphical processing units (GPUs). We introduce the BioNeMo Framework to facilitate the training of computational bio…
▽ More
Artificial Intelligence models encoding biology and chemistry are opening new routes to high-throughput and high-quality in-silico drug development. However, their training increasingly relies on computational scale, with recent protein language models (pLM) training on hundreds of graphical processing units (GPUs). We introduce the BioNeMo Framework to facilitate the training of computational biology and chemistry AI models across hundreds of GPUs. Its modular design allows the integration of individual components, such as data loaders, into existing workflows and is open to community contributions. We detail technical features of the BioNeMo Framework through use cases such as pLM pre-training and fine-tuning. On 256 NVIDIA A100s, BioNeMo Framework trains a three billion parameter BERT-based pLM on over one trillion tokens in 4.2 days. The BioNeMo Framework is open-source and free for everyone to use.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2025; v1 submitted 15 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
Skilled motor control implies a low entropy of states but a high entropy of actions
Authors:
Nicola Catenacci Volpi,
Martin Greaves,
Dari Trendafilov,
Christoph Salge,
Giovanni Pezzulo,
Daniel Polani
Abstract:
The mastery of skills such as playing tennis or balancing an inverted pendulum implies a very accurate control of movements to achieve the task goals. Traditional accounts of skilled action control that focus on either routinization or perceptual control make opposite predictions about the ways we achieve mastery. The notion of routinization emphasizes the decrease of the variance of our actions,…
▽ More
The mastery of skills such as playing tennis or balancing an inverted pendulum implies a very accurate control of movements to achieve the task goals. Traditional accounts of skilled action control that focus on either routinization or perceptual control make opposite predictions about the ways we achieve mastery. The notion of routinization emphasizes the decrease of the variance of our actions, whereas the notion of perceptual control emphasizes the decrease of the variance of the states we visit, but not of the actions we execute. Here, we studied how participants managed control tasks of varying levels of complexity, which consisted in controlling inverted pendulums of different lengths. We used information-theoretic measures to compare the predictions of alternative theoretic accounts that focus on routinization and perceptual control, respectively. Our results indicate that the successful performance of the control task strongly correlates with the decrease of state variability and the increase of action variability. As postulated by perceptual control theory, the mastery of skills consists in achieving stable control goals by flexible means.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
