-
Down with ncRNA! Long live fRNA and jRNA!
Authors:
Dan Graur
Abstract:
Noncoding RNA (ncRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) are scientifically invalid terms because they define molecular entities according to properties they do not possess and functions they do not perform. Here, I suggest retiring these two terms. Instead, I suggest using an evolutionary classification of genomic function, in which every RNA molecule is classified as either "functional" or "junk' a…
▽ More
Noncoding RNA (ncRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) are scientifically invalid terms because they define molecular entities according to properties they do not possess and functions they do not perform. Here, I suggest retiring these two terms. Instead, I suggest using an evolutionary classification of genomic function, in which every RNA molecule is classified as either "functional" or "junk' according to its selected effect function. Dealing with RNA molecules whose functional status is unknown require us to phrase Popperian nomenclatures that spell out the conditions for their own refutation. Thus, in the absence of falsifying evidence, RNA molecules of unknown function must be considered junk RNA (jRNA).
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Rubbish DNA: The functionless fraction of the human genome
Authors:
Dan Graur
Abstract:
Because genomes are products of natural processes rather than intelligent design, all genomes contain functional and nonfunctional parts. The fraction of the genome that has no biological function is called rubbish DNA. Rubbish DNA consists of junk DNA, i.e., the fraction of the genome on which selection does not operate, and garbage DNA, i.e., sequences that lower the fitness of the organism, but…
▽ More
Because genomes are products of natural processes rather than intelligent design, all genomes contain functional and nonfunctional parts. The fraction of the genome that has no biological function is called rubbish DNA. Rubbish DNA consists of junk DNA, i.e., the fraction of the genome on which selection does not operate, and garbage DNA, i.e., sequences that lower the fitness of the organism, but exist in the genome because purifying selection is neither omnipotent nor instantaneous. In this chapter, I (1) review the concepts of genomic function and functionlessness from an evolutionary perspective, (2) present a precise nomenclature of genomic function, (3) discuss the evidence for the existence of vast quantities of junk DNA within the human genome, (4) discuss the mutational mechanisms responsible for generating junk DNA, (5) spell out the necessary evolutionary conditions for maintaining junk DNA, (6) outline various methodologies for estimating the functional fraction within the genome, and (7) present a recent estimate for the functional fraction of our genome.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
A scale-free method for testing the proportionality of branch lengths between two phylogenetic trees
Authors:
Yichen Zheng,
William Ott,
Chinmaya Gupta,
Dan Graur
Abstract:
We introduce a scale-free method for testing the proportionality of branch lengths between two phylogenetic trees that have the same topology and contain the same set of taxa. This method scales both trees to a total length of 1 and sums up the differences for each branch. Compared to previous methods, ours yields a fully symmetrical score that measures proportionality without being affected by sc…
▽ More
We introduce a scale-free method for testing the proportionality of branch lengths between two phylogenetic trees that have the same topology and contain the same set of taxa. This method scales both trees to a total length of 1 and sums up the differences for each branch. Compared to previous methods, ours yields a fully symmetrical score that measures proportionality without being affected by scale. We call this score the normalized tree distance (NTD). Based on real data, we demonstrate that NTD scores are distributed unimodally, in a manner similar to a lognormal distribution. The NTD score can be used to, for example, detect co-evolutionary processes and measure the accuracy of branch length estimates.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
An extended reply to Mendez et al.: The 'extremely ancient' chromosome that still isn't
Authors:
Eran Elhaik,
Tatiana V. Tatarinova,
Anatole A. Klyosov,
Dan Graur
Abstract:
Earlier this year, we published a scathing critique of a paper by Mendez et al. (2013) in which the claim was made that a Y chromosome was 237,000-581,000 years old. Elhaik et al. (2014) also attacked a popular article in Scientific American by the senior author of Mendez et al. (2013), whose title was "Sex with other human species might have been the secret of Homo sapiens's [sic] success" (Hamme…
▽ More
Earlier this year, we published a scathing critique of a paper by Mendez et al. (2013) in which the claim was made that a Y chromosome was 237,000-581,000 years old. Elhaik et al. (2014) also attacked a popular article in Scientific American by the senior author of Mendez et al. (2013), whose title was "Sex with other human species might have been the secret of Homo sapiens's [sic] success" (Hammer 2013). Five of the 11 authors of Mendez et al. (2013) have now written a "rebuttal," and we were allowed to reply. Unfortunately, our reply was censored for being "too sarcastic and inflamed." References were removed, meanings were castrated, and a dedication in the Acknowledgments was deleted. Now, that the so-called rebuttal by 45% of the authors of Mendez et al. (2013) has been published together with our vasectomized reply, we decided to make public our entire reply to the so called "rebuttal." In fact, we go one step further, and publish a version of the reply that has not even been self-censored.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2014; v1 submitted 15 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
