Comparison of aerosol emissions during specific speech tasks
Authors:
Miriam van Mersbergen,
Jeffrey Marchetta,
Daniel Foti,
Eric Pillow,
Apartim Dasgupta,
Chandler Cain,
Stephen Morvant
Abstract:
The study of aerosols and droplets emitted from the oral cavity has become increasingly important throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies show particulates emitted while speaking were generally much smaller compared to coughing or sneezing. However, recent investigations revealed that they are large enough to carry respiratory contagions. Although studies have shown that particulate emissions do…
▽ More
The study of aerosols and droplets emitted from the oral cavity has become increasingly important throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies show particulates emitted while speaking were generally much smaller compared to coughing or sneezing. However, recent investigations revealed that they are large enough to carry respiratory contagions. Although studies have shown that particulate emissions do indeed occur during speech, to date, there is little information about the relative contribution of different speech sounds in producing particle emissions. This study compares airborne aerosol generation in participants producing isolated speech sounds: fricative consonants, plosive consonants, and vowel sounds. While participants produced isolated speech tasks, a planar beam of laser light, a high-speed camera, and image software calculated the number of particulates detected overtime. This study compares airborne aerosols emitted by human participants at a distance of 2.54 cm between the laser sheet and the mouth and reveals statistically significant increases in particulate counts over ambient dust distribution for all speech sounds. Vowel sounds were statistically greater than consonants, suggesting that mouth opening, as opposed to place of vocal tract constriction or manner of sound production, might be the primary influence in the degree to which particulates become aerosolized during speech. Results of this research will inform boundary conditions for computation models of aerosolized particulates during speech.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
Electrophysiological indicators of gesture perception
Authors:
Maria E. Cabrera,
Keisha Novak,
Dan Foti,
Richard Voyles,
Juan P. Wachs
Abstract:
Background: While there has been abundant research concerning neurological responses to gesture generation, the time course of gesture processing is not well understood. Specifically, it is not clear if or how particular characteristics within the kinematic execution of gestures capture attention and aid in the classification of gestures with communicative intent. If indeed key features of gesture…
▽ More
Background: While there has been abundant research concerning neurological responses to gesture generation, the time course of gesture processing is not well understood. Specifically, it is not clear if or how particular characteristics within the kinematic execution of gestures capture attention and aid in the classification of gestures with communicative intent. If indeed key features of gestures with perceptual saliency exist, such features could help form the basis of a compact representation of the gestures in memory. Methods: This study used a set of available gesture videos as stimuli. The timing for salient features of performed gestures was determined by isolating inflection points in the hands' motion trajectories. Participants passively viewed the gesture videos while continuous EEG data was collected. We focused on mu oscillations (10 Hz) and used linear regression to test for associations between the timing of mu oscillations and inflection points in motion trajectories. Results: Peaks in the EEG signals at central and occipital electrodes were used to isolate the salient events within each gesture. EEG power oscillations were detected 343 and 400ms on average after inflection points at occipital and central electrodes, respectively. A regression model showed that inflection points in the motion trajectories strongly predicted subsequent mu oscillations (R^2=0.961, p<.01). Conclusion: The results suggest that coordinated activity in the visual and motor cortices are highly correlated with key motion components within gesture trajectories. These points may be associated with neural signatures used to encode gestures in memory for later identification and even recognition.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
