Upcycling Human Excrement: The Gut Microbiome to Soil Microbiome Axis
Authors:
Jeff Meilander,
Chloe Herman,
Andrew Manley,
Georgia Augustine,
Dawn Birdsell,
Evan Bolyen,
Kimberly R. Celona,
Hayden Coffey,
Jill Cocking,
Teddy Donoghue,
Alexis Draves,
Daryn Erickson,
Marissa Foley,
Liz Gehret,
Johannah Hagen,
Crystal Hepp,
Parker Ingram,
David John,
Katarina Kadar,
Paul Keim,
Victoria Lloyd,
Christina Osterink,
Victoria Queeney,
Diego Ramirez,
Antonio Romero
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Human excrement composting (HEC) is a sustainable strategy for human excrement (HE) management that recycles nutrients and mitigates health risks while reducing reliance on freshwater, fossil fuels, and fertilizers. We present a comprehensive microbial time series analysis of HEC and show that the initial gut-like microbiome of HEC systems transitions to a microbiome similar to soil and traditiona…
▽ More
Human excrement composting (HEC) is a sustainable strategy for human excrement (HE) management that recycles nutrients and mitigates health risks while reducing reliance on freshwater, fossil fuels, and fertilizers. We present a comprehensive microbial time series analysis of HEC and show that the initial gut-like microbiome of HEC systems transitions to a microbiome similar to soil and traditional compost in fifteen biological replicates tracked weekly for one year.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
Avoiding the bullies: The resilience of cooperation among unequals
Authors:
Michael Foley,
Rory Smead,
Patrick Forber,
Christoph Riedl
Abstract:
Can egalitarian norms or conventions survive the presence of dominant individuals who are ensured of victory in conflicts? We investigate the interaction of power asymmetry and partner choice in games of conflict over a contested resource. We introduce three models to study the emergence and resilience of cooperation among unequals when interaction is random, when individuals can choose their part…
▽ More
Can egalitarian norms or conventions survive the presence of dominant individuals who are ensured of victory in conflicts? We investigate the interaction of power asymmetry and partner choice in games of conflict over a contested resource. We introduce three models to study the emergence and resilience of cooperation among unequals when interaction is random, when individuals can choose their partners, and where power asymmetries dynamically depend on accumulated payoffs. We find that the ability to avoid bullies with higher competitive ability afforded by partner choice mostly restores cooperative conventions and that the competitive hierarchy never forms. Partner choice counteracts the hyper dominance of bullies who are isolated in the network and eliminates the need for others to coordinate in a coalition. When competitive ability dynamically depends on cumulative payoffs, complex cycles of coupled network-strategy-rank changes emerge. Effective collaborators gain popularity (and thus power), adopt aggressive behavior, get isolated, and ultimately lose power. Neither the network nor behavior converge to a stable equilibrium. Despite the instability of power dynamics, the cooperative convention in the population remains stable overall and long-term inequality is completely eliminated. The interaction between partner choice and dynamic power asymmetry is crucial for these results: without partner choice, bullies cannot be isolated, and without dynamic power asymmetry, bullies do not lose their power even when isolated. We analytically identify a single critical point that marks a phase transition in all three iterations of our models. This critical point is where the first individual breaks from the convention and cycles start to emerge.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
