Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challenge
Authors:
Marc Aubreville,
Nikolas Stathonikos,
Christof A. Bertram,
Robert Klopleisch,
Natalie ter Hoeve,
Francesco Ciompi,
Frauke Wilm,
Christian Marzahl,
Taryn A. Donovan,
Andreas Maier,
Jack Breen,
Nishant Ravikumar,
Youjin Chung,
Jinah Park,
Ramin Nateghi,
Fattaneh Pourakpour,
Rutger H. J. Fick,
Saima Ben Hadj,
Mostafa Jahanifar,
Nasir Rajpoot,
Jakob Dexl,
Thomas Wittenberg,
Satoshi Kondo,
Maxime W. Lafarge,
Viktor H. Koelzer
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly…
▽ More
The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly deteriorate when applied in a different clinical environment than was used for training. One decisive component in the underlying domain shift has been identified as the variability caused by using different whole slide scanners. The goal of the MICCAI MIDOG 2021 challenge has been to propose and evaluate methods that counter this domain shift and derive scanner-agnostic mitosis detection algorithms. The challenge used a training set of 200 cases, split across four scanning systems. As a test set, an additional 100 cases split across four scanning systems, including two previously unseen scanners, were given. The best approaches performed on an expert level, with the winning algorithm yielding an F_1 score of 0.748 (CI95: 0.704-0.781). In this paper, we evaluate and compare the approaches that were submitted to the challenge and identify methodological factors contributing to better performance.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
Diffusion MRI microstructure models with in vivo human brain Connectom data: results from a multi-group comparison
Authors:
Uran Ferizi,
Benoit Scherrer,
Torben Schneider,
Mohammad Alipoor,
Odin Eufracio,
Rutger H. J. Fick,
Rachid Deriche,
Markus Nilsson,
Ana K. Loya-Olivas,
Mariano Rivera,
Dirk H. J. Poot,
Alonso Ramirez-Manzanares,
Jose L. Marroquin,
Ariel Rokem,
Christian Pötter,
Robert F. Dougherty,
Ken Sakaie,
Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott,
Simon K. Warfield,
Thomas Witzel,
Lawrence L. Wald,
José G. Raya,
Daniel C. Alexander
Abstract:
A large number of mathematical models have been proposed to describe the measured signal in diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and infer properties about the white matter microstructure. However, a head-to-head comparison of DW-MRI models is critically missing in the field. To address this deficiency, we organized the "White Matter Modeling Challenge" during the International…
▽ More
A large number of mathematical models have been proposed to describe the measured signal in diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and infer properties about the white matter microstructure. However, a head-to-head comparison of DW-MRI models is critically missing in the field. To address this deficiency, we organized the "White Matter Modeling Challenge" during the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2015 conference. This competition aimed at identifying the DW-MRI models that best predict unseen DW data. in vivo DW-MRI data was acquired on the Connectom scanner at the A.A.Martinos Center (Massachusetts General Hospital) using gradients strength of up to 300 mT/m and a broad set of diffusion times. We focused on assessing the DW signal prediction in two regions: the genu in the corpus callosum, where the fibres are relatively straight and parallel, and the fornix, where the configuration of fibres is more complex. The challenge participants had access to three-quarters of the whole dataset, and their models were ranked on their ability to predict the remaining unseen quarter of data. In this paper we provide both an overview and a more in-depth description of each evaluated model, report the challenge results, and infer trends about the model characteristics that were associated with high model ranking. This work provides a much needed benchmark for DW-MRI models. The acquired data and model details for signal prediction evaluation are provided online to encourage a larger scale assessment of diffusion models in the future.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2016; v1 submitted 25 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
