Non-equilibrium dynamics of adaptation in sensory systems
Authors:
Daniele Conti,
Thierry Mora
Abstract:
Adaptation is used by biological sensory systems to respond to a wide range of environmental signals, by adapting their response properties to the statistics of the stimulus in order to maximize information transmission. We derive rules of optimal adaptation to changes in the mean and variance of a continuous stimulus in terms of Bayesian filters, and map them onto stochastic equations that couple…
▽ More
Adaptation is used by biological sensory systems to respond to a wide range of environmental signals, by adapting their response properties to the statistics of the stimulus in order to maximize information transmission. We derive rules of optimal adaptation to changes in the mean and variance of a continuous stimulus in terms of Bayesian filters, and map them onto stochastic equations that couple the state of the environment to an internal variable controling the response function. We calculate numerical and exact results for the speed and accuracy of adaptation, and its impact on information transmission. We find that, in the regime of efficient adaptation, the speed of adaptation scales sublinearly with the rate of change of the environment. Finally, we exploit the mathematical equivalence between adaptation and stochastic thermodynamics to quantitatively relate adaptation to the irreversibility of the adaptation time course, defined by the rate of entropy production. Our results suggest a means to empirically quantify adaptation in a model-free and non-parametric way.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2021; v1 submitted 19 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
Methodological Issues in Multistage Genome-Wide Association Studies
Authors:
Duncan C. Thomas,
Graham Casey,
David V. Conti,
Robert W. Haile,
Juan Pablo Lewinger,
Daniel O. Stram
Abstract:
Because of the high cost of commercial genotyping chip technologies, many investigations have used a two-stage design for genome-wide association studies, using part of the sample for an initial discovery of ``promising'' SNPs at a less stringent significance level and the remainder in a joint analysis of just these SNPs using custom genotyping. Typical cost savings of about 50% are possible with…
▽ More
Because of the high cost of commercial genotyping chip technologies, many investigations have used a two-stage design for genome-wide association studies, using part of the sample for an initial discovery of ``promising'' SNPs at a less stringent significance level and the remainder in a joint analysis of just these SNPs using custom genotyping. Typical cost savings of about 50% are possible with this design to obtain comparable levels of overall type I error and power by using about half the sample for stage I and carrying about 0.1% of SNPs forward to the second stage, the optimal design depending primarily upon the ratio of costs per genotype for stages I and II. However, with the rapidly declining costs of the commercial panels, the generally low observed ORs of current studies, and many studies aiming to test multiple hypotheses and multiple endpoints, many investigators are abandoning the two-stage design in favor of simply genotyping all available subjects using a standard high-density panel. Concern is sometimes raised about the absence of a ``replication'' panel in this approach, as required by some high-profile journals, but it must be appreciated that the two-stage design is not a discovery/replication design but simply a more efficient design for discovery using a joint analysis of the data from both stages. Once a subset of highly-significant associations has been discovered, a truly independent ``exact replication'' study is needed in a similar population of the same promising SNPs using similar methods.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2010;
originally announced October 2010.
