-
History-dependence shapes causal inference of brain-behaviour relationships
Authors:
Brandon Caie,
Gunnar Blohm
Abstract:
Behavioural and neural time series are often correlated with the past. This history-dependence may represent a fundamental property of the measured variables, or may arise from how confounding variables change over time. Here we argue that undecidability about the ground-truth of history-dependence is a general computational property of systems that exchange information with its environment, and s…
▽ More
Behavioural and neural time series are often correlated with the past. This history-dependence may represent a fundamental property of the measured variables, or may arise from how confounding variables change over time. Here we argue that undecidability about the ground-truth of history-dependence is a general computational property of systems that exchange information with its environment, and show that the resulting uncertainty has a direct impact on causal inference. We first argue that uncertainty in the ground truth of history-dependence is an inherent property of open systems that cannot be explicitly falsified. Simple model systems are then simulated to show how different assumptions about history-dependence can lead to spurious correlations and statistical properties of data distributions that are typically unaccounted for. We then consider this problem from an interventionist perspective, showing that interventions can only be guaranteed to remedy the spurious correlation problem when the latent dynamics between the intervention and measured processes are known a priori, and the effect of the intervention is invariant at the chosen level of analysis. We conclude that uncertainty about history-dependence is a fundamental property of the study of neural systems, and in light of this discuss how causality should be assessed in neuroscience.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Generative Adversarial Collaborations: A practical guide for conference organizers and participating scientists
Authors:
Gunnar Blohm,
Benjamin Peters,
Ralf Haefner,
Leyla Isik,
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,
Jennifer S. Lieberman,
Carlos R. Ponce,
Gemma Roig,
Megan A. K. Peters
Abstract:
Generative adversarial collaborations (GACs) are a form of formal teamwork between groups of scientists with diverging views. The goal of GACs is to identify and ultimately resolve the most important challenges, controversies, and exciting theoretical and empirical debates in a given research field. A GAC team would develop specific, agreed-upon avenues to resolve debates in order to move a field…
▽ More
Generative adversarial collaborations (GACs) are a form of formal teamwork between groups of scientists with diverging views. The goal of GACs is to identify and ultimately resolve the most important challenges, controversies, and exciting theoretical and empirical debates in a given research field. A GAC team would develop specific, agreed-upon avenues to resolve debates in order to move a field of research forward in a collaborative way. Such adversarial collaborations have many benefits and opportunities but also come with challenges. Here, we use our experience from (1) creating and running the GAC program for the Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN) conference and (2) implementing and leading GACs on particular scientific problems to provide a practical guide for future GAC program organizers and leaders of individual GACs.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Neuromatch Academy: Teaching Computational Neuroscience with global accessibility
Authors:
Tara van Viegen,
Athena Akrami,
Kate Bonnen,
Eric DeWitt,
Alexandre Hyafil,
Helena Ledmyr,
Grace W. Lindsay,
Patrick Mineault,
John D. Murray,
Xaq Pitkow,
Aina Puce,
Madineh Sedigh-Sarvestani,
Carsen Stringer,
Titipat Achakulvisut,
Elnaz Alikarami,
Melvin Selim Atay,
Eleanor Batty,
Jeffrey C. Erlich,
Byron V. Galbraith,
Yueqi Guo,
Ashley L. Juavinett,
Matthew R. Krause,
Songting Li,
Marius Pachitariu,
Elizabeth Straley
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuromatch Academy designed and ran a fully online 3-week Computational Neuroscience summer school for 1757 students with 191 teaching assistants working in virtual inverted (or flipped) classrooms and on small group projects. Fourteen languages, active community management, and low cost allowed for an unprecedented level of inclusivity and universal accessibility.
Neuromatch Academy designed and ran a fully online 3-week Computational Neuroscience summer school for 1757 students with 191 teaching assistants working in virtual inverted (or flipped) classrooms and on small group projects. Fourteen languages, active community management, and low cost allowed for an unprecedented level of inclusivity and universal accessibility.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Appreciating the variety of goals in computational neuroscience
Authors:
Konrad P. Kording,
Gunnar Blohm,
Paul Schrater,
Kendrick Kay
Abstract:
Within computational neuroscience, informal interactions with modelers often reveal wildly divergent goals. In this opinion piece, we explicitly address the diversity of goals that motivate and ultimately influence modeling efforts. We argue that a wide range of goals can be meaningfully taken to be of highest importance. A simple informal survey conducted on the Internet confirmed the diversity o…
▽ More
Within computational neuroscience, informal interactions with modelers often reveal wildly divergent goals. In this opinion piece, we explicitly address the diversity of goals that motivate and ultimately influence modeling efforts. We argue that a wide range of goals can be meaningfully taken to be of highest importance. A simple informal survey conducted on the Internet confirmed the diversity of goals in the community. However, different priorities or preferences of individual researchers can lead to divergent model evaluation criteria. We propose that many disagreements in evaluating the merit of computational research stem from differences in goals and not from the mechanics of constructing, describing, and validating models. We suggest that authors state explicitly their goals when proposing models so that others can judge the quality of the research with respect to its stated goals.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Movement science needs different pose tracking algorithms
Authors:
Nidhi Seethapathi,
Shaofei Wang,
Rachit Saluja,
Gunnar Blohm,
Konrad P. Kording
Abstract:
Over the last decade, computer science has made progress towards extracting body pose from single camera photographs or videos. This promises to enable movement science to detect disease, quantify movement performance, and take the science out of the lab into the real world. However, current pose tracking algorithms fall short of the needs of movement science; the types of movement data that matte…
▽ More
Over the last decade, computer science has made progress towards extracting body pose from single camera photographs or videos. This promises to enable movement science to detect disease, quantify movement performance, and take the science out of the lab into the real world. However, current pose tracking algorithms fall short of the needs of movement science; the types of movement data that matter are poorly estimated. For instance, the metrics currently used for evaluating pose tracking algorithms use noisy hand-labeled ground truth data and do not prioritize precision of relevant variables like three-dimensional position, velocity, acceleration, and forces which are crucial for movement science. Here, we introduce the scientific disciplines that use movement data, the types of data they need, and discuss the changes needed to make pose tracking truly transformative for movement science.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
