Tangent functional connectomes uncover more unique phenotypic traits
Authors:
Kausar Abbas,
Mintao Liu,
Michael Wang,
Duy Duong-Tran,
Uttara Tipnis,
Enrico Amico,
Alan D. Kaplan,
Mario Dzemidzic,
David Kareken,
Beau M. Ances,
Jaroslaw Harezlak,
Joaquín Goñi
Abstract:
Functional connectomes (FCs) contain pairwise estimations of functional couplings based on pairs of brain regions activity. FCs are commonly represented as correlation matrices that are symmetric positive definite (SPD) lying on or inside the SPD manifold. Since the geometry on the SPD manifold is non-Euclidean, the inter-related entries of FCs undermine the use of Euclidean-based distances. By pr…
▽ More
Functional connectomes (FCs) contain pairwise estimations of functional couplings based on pairs of brain regions activity. FCs are commonly represented as correlation matrices that are symmetric positive definite (SPD) lying on or inside the SPD manifold. Since the geometry on the SPD manifold is non-Euclidean, the inter-related entries of FCs undermine the use of Euclidean-based distances. By projecting FCs into a tangent space, we can obtain tangent functional connectomes (tangent-FCs). Tangent-FCs have shown a higher predictive power of behavior and cognition, but no studies have evaluated the effect of such projections with respect to fingerprinting. We hypothesize that tangent-FCs have a higher fingerprint than regular FCs. Fingerprinting was measured by identification rates (ID rates) on test-retest FCs as well as on monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Our results showed that identification rates are systematically higher when using tangent-FCs. Specifically, we found: (i) Riemann and log-Euclidean matrix references systematically led to higher ID rates. (ii) In tangent-FCs, Main-diagonal regularization prior to tangent space projection was critical for ID rate when using Euclidean distance, whereas barely affected ID rates when using correlation distance. (iii) ID rates were dependent on condition and fMRI scan length. (iv) Parcellation granularity was key for ID rates in FCs, as well as in tangent-FCs with fixed regularization, whereas optimal regularization of tangent-FCs mostly removed this effect. (v) Correlation distance in tangent-FCs outperformed any other configuration of distance on FCs or on tangent-FCs across the fingerprint gradient (here sampled by assessing test-retest, Monozygotic and Dizygotic twins). (vi)ID rates tended to be higher in task scans compared to resting-state scans when accounting for fMRI scan length.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2023; v1 submitted 13 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
GEFF: Graph Embedding for Functional Fingerprinting
Authors:
Kausar Abbas,
Enrico Amico,
Diana Otero Svaldi,
Uttara Tipnis,
Duy Anh Duong-Tran,
Mintao Liu,
Meenusree Rajapandian,
Jaroslaw Harezlak,
Beau M. Ances,
Joaquín Goñi
Abstract:
It has been well established that Functional Connectomes (FCs), as estimated from functional MRI (fMRI) data, have an individual fingerprint that can be used to identify an individual from a population (subject-identification). Although identification rate is high when using resting-state FCs, other tasks show moderate to low values. Furthermore, identification rate is task-dependent, and is low w…
▽ More
It has been well established that Functional Connectomes (FCs), as estimated from functional MRI (fMRI) data, have an individual fingerprint that can be used to identify an individual from a population (subject-identification). Although identification rate is high when using resting-state FCs, other tasks show moderate to low values. Furthermore, identification rate is task-dependent, and is low when distinct cognitive states, as captured by different fMRI tasks, are compared. Here we propose an embedding framework, GEFF (Graph Embedding for Functional Fingerprinting), based on group-level decomposition of FCs into eigenvectors. GEFF creates an eigenspace representation of a group of subjects using one or more task FCs (Learning Stage). In the Identification Stage, we compare new instances of FCs from the Learning subjects within this eigenspace (validation dataset). The validation dataset contains FCs either from the same tasks as the Learning dataset or from the remaining tasks that were not included in Learning. Assessment of validation FCs within the eigenspace results in significantly increased subject-identification rates for all fMRI tasks tested and potentially task-independent fingerprinting process. It is noteworthy that combining resting-state with one fMRI task for GEFF Learning Stage covers most of the cognitive space for subject identification. In addition to subject-identification, GEFF was also used for identification of cognitive states, i.e. to identify the task associated to a given FC, regardless of the subject being already in the Learning dataset or not (subject-independent task-identification). In addition, we also show that eigenvectors from the Learning Stage can be characterized as task-dominant, subject dominant or neither, providing a deeper insight into the extent of variance in functional connectivity across individuals and cognitive states.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
