-
Analysis of the MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Metastases (BraTS-METS) 2025 Lighthouse Challenge: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre- and Post-treatment MRI
Authors:
Nazanin Maleki,
Raisa Amiruddin,
Ahmed W. Moawad,
Nikolay Yordanov,
Athanasios Gkampenis,
Pascal Fehringer,
Fabian Umeh,
Crystal Chukwurah,
Fatima Memon,
Bojan Petrovic,
Justin Cramer,
Mark Krycia,
Elizabeth B. Shrickel,
Ichiro Ikuta,
Gerard Thompson,
Lorenna Vidal,
Vilma Kosovic,
Adam E. Goldman-Yassen,
Virginia Hill,
Tiffany So,
Sedra Mhana,
Albara Alotaibi,
Nathan Page,
Prisha Bhatia,
Yasaman Sharifi
, et al. (218 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Despite continuous advancements in cancer treatment, brain metastatic disease remains a significant complication of primary cancer and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. One approach for improving diagnosis, management, and outcomes is to implement algorithms based on artificial intelligence for the automated segmentation of both pre- and post-treatment MRI brain images. Such algorithms…
▽ More
Despite continuous advancements in cancer treatment, brain metastatic disease remains a significant complication of primary cancer and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. One approach for improving diagnosis, management, and outcomes is to implement algorithms based on artificial intelligence for the automated segmentation of both pre- and post-treatment MRI brain images. Such algorithms rely on volumetric criteria for lesion identification and treatment response assessment, which are still not available in clinical practice. Therefore, it is critical to establish tools for rapid volumetric segmentations methods that can be translated to clinical practice and that are trained on high quality annotated data. The BraTS-METS 2025 Lighthouse Challenge aims to address this critical need by establishing inter-rater and intra-rater variability in dataset annotation by generating high quality annotated datasets from four individual instances of segmentation by neuroradiologists while being recorded on video (two instances doing "from scratch" and two instances after AI pre-segmentation). This high-quality annotated dataset will be used for testing phase in 2025 Lighthouse challenge and will be publicly released at the completion of the challenge. The 2025 Lighthouse challenge will also release the 2023 and 2024 segmented datasets that were annotated using an established pipeline of pre-segmentation, student annotation, two neuroradiologists checking, and one neuroradiologist finalizing the process. It builds upon its previous edition by including post-treatment cases in the dataset. Using these high-quality annotated datasets, the 2025 Lighthouse challenge plans to test benchmark algorithms for automated segmentation of pre-and post-treatment brain metastases (BM), trained on diverse and multi-institutional datasets of MRI images obtained from patients with brain metastases.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2025; v1 submitted 16 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
The ecological forecast limit revisited: Potential, actual and relative system predictability
Authors:
Marieke Wesselkamp,
Jakob Albrecht,
Ewan Pinnington,
William J. Castillo,
Florian Pappenberger,
Carsten F. Dormann
Abstract:
Ecological forecasts are model-based statements about currently unknown ecosystem states in time or space. For a model forecast to be useful to inform decision makers, model validation and verification determine adequateness. The measure of forecast goodness that can be translated into a limit up to which a forecast is acceptable is known as the 'forecast limit'. While verification in weather fore…
▽ More
Ecological forecasts are model-based statements about currently unknown ecosystem states in time or space. For a model forecast to be useful to inform decision makers, model validation and verification determine adequateness. The measure of forecast goodness that can be translated into a limit up to which a forecast is acceptable is known as the 'forecast limit'. While verification in weather forecasting follows strict criteria with established metrics and forecast limits, assessments of ecological forecasting models still remain experiment-specific, and forecast limits are rarely reported. As such, users of ecological forecasts remain uninformed of how far into the future statements can be trusted. In this work, we synthesise existing approaches to define empirical forecast limits in a unified framework for assessing ecological predictability and offer recipes for their computation. We distinguish the model's potential and absolute forecast limit, and show how a benchmark model can help determine its relative forecast limit. The approaches are demonstrated with three case studies from population, ecosystem, and Earth system research. We found that forecast limits can be computed with three requirements: A verification reference, a scoring function, and a predictive error tolerance. Within our framework, forecast limits are defined for practically any ecological forecast and support research on ecological predictability analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2025; v1 submitted 1 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Evaluation of software impact designed for biomedical research: Are we measuring what's meaningful?
Authors:
Awan Afiaz,
Andrey Ivanov,
John Chamberlin,
David Hanauer,
Candace Savonen,
Mary J Goldman,
Martin Morgan,
Michael Reich,
Alexander Getka,
Aaron Holmes,
Sarthak Pati,
Dan Knight,
Paul C. Boutros,
Spyridon Bakas,
J. Gregory Caporaso,
Guilherme Del Fiol,
Harry Hochheiser,
Brian Haas,
Patrick D. Schloss,
James A. Eddy,
Jake Albrecht,
Andrey Fedorov,
Levi Waldron,
Ava M. Hoffman,
Richard L. Bradshaw
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Software is vital for the advancement of biology and medicine. Analysis of usage and impact metrics can help developers determine user and community engagement, justify additional funding, encourage additional use, identify unanticipated use cases, and help define improvement areas. However, there are challenges associated with these analyses including distorted or misleading metrics, as well as e…
▽ More
Software is vital for the advancement of biology and medicine. Analysis of usage and impact metrics can help developers determine user and community engagement, justify additional funding, encourage additional use, identify unanticipated use cases, and help define improvement areas. However, there are challenges associated with these analyses including distorted or misleading metrics, as well as ethical and security concerns. More attention to the nuances involved in capturing impact across the spectrum of biological software is needed. Furthermore, some tools may be especially beneficial to a small audience, yet may not have compelling typical usage metrics. We propose more general guidelines, as well as strategies for more specific types of software. We highlight outstanding issues regarding how communities measure or evaluate software impact. To get a deeper understanding of current practices for software evaluations, we performed a survey of participants in the Informatics Technology for Cancer Research (ITCR) program funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). We also investigated software among this community and others to assess how often infrastructure that supports such evaluations is implemented and how this impacts rates of papers describing usage of the software. We find that developers recognize the utility of analyzing software usage, but struggle to find the time or funding for such analyses. We also find that infrastructure such as social media presence, more in-depth documentation, the presence of software health metrics, and clear information on how to contact developers seem to be associated with increased usage rates. Our findings can help scientific software developers make the most out of evaluations of their software.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI
Authors:
Ahmed W. Moawad,
Anastasia Janas,
Ujjwal Baid,
Divya Ramakrishnan,
Rachit Saluja,
Nader Ashraf,
Nazanin Maleki,
Leon Jekel,
Nikolay Yordanov,
Pascal Fehringer,
Athanasios Gkampenis,
Raisa Amiruddin,
Amirreza Manteghinejad,
Maruf Adewole,
Jake Albrecht,
Udunna Anazodo,
Sanjay Aneja,
Syed Muhammad Anwar,
Timothy Bergquist,
Veronica Chiang,
Verena Chung,
Gian Marco Conte,
Farouk Dako,
James Eddy,
Ivan Ezhov
, et al. (207 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and chara…
▽ More
The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space.The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well-annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied clinical environments and providing personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2024; v1 submitted 1 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Focus on Pediatrics (CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs)
Authors:
Anahita Fathi Kazerooni,
Nastaran Khalili,
Xinyang Liu,
Debanjan Haldar,
Zhifan Jiang,
Syed Muhammed Anwar,
Jake Albrecht,
Maruf Adewole,
Udunna Anazodo,
Hannah Anderson,
Sina Bagheri,
Ujjwal Baid,
Timothy Bergquist,
Austin J. Borja,
Evan Calabrese,
Verena Chung,
Gian-Marco Conte,
Farouk Dako,
James Eddy,
Ivan Ezhov,
Ariana Familiar,
Keyvan Farahani,
Shuvanjan Haldar,
Juan Eugenio Iglesias,
Anastasia Janas
, et al. (48 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Pediatric tumors of the central nervous system are the most common cause of cancer-related death in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade gliomas in children is less than 20\%. Due to their rarity, the diagnosis of these entities is often delayed, their treatment is mainly based on historic treatment concepts, and clinical trials require multi-institutional collaborations. The MICCA…
▽ More
Pediatric tumors of the central nervous system are the most common cause of cancer-related death in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade gliomas in children is less than 20\%. Due to their rarity, the diagnosis of these entities is often delayed, their treatment is mainly based on historic treatment concepts, and clinical trials require multi-institutional collaborations. The MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge is a landmark community benchmark event with a successful history of 12 years of resource creation for the segmentation and analysis of adult glioma. Here we present the CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge, which represents the first BraTS challenge focused on pediatric brain tumors with data acquired across multiple international consortia dedicated to pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical trials. The BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge focuses on benchmarking the development of volumentric segmentation algorithms for pediatric brain glioma through standardized quantitative performance evaluation metrics utilized across the BraTS 2023 cluster of challenges. Models gaining knowledge from the BraTS-PEDs multi-parametric structural MRI (mpMRI) training data will be evaluated on separate validation and unseen test mpMRI dataof high-grade pediatric glioma. The CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge brings together clinicians and AI/imaging scientists to lead to faster development of automated segmentation techniques that could benefit clinical trials, and ultimately the care of children with brain tumors.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2024; v1 submitted 26 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Album: a framework for scientific data processing with software solutions of heterogeneous tools
Authors:
Jan Philipp Albrecht,
Deborah Schmidt,
Kyle Harrington
Abstract:
Album is a decentralized distribution platform for solutions to specific scientific problems. It works across platforms, tools, and data domains and is designed to address limitations in reproducibility of scientific data software solutions and workflows, particularly when interactivity is needed. `album` can be used to programmatically define how to interoperate between applications. It can ship…
▽ More
Album is a decentralized distribution platform for solutions to specific scientific problems. It works across platforms, tools, and data domains and is designed to address limitations in reproducibility of scientific data software solutions and workflows, particularly when interactivity is needed. `album` can be used to programmatically define how to interoperate between applications. It can ship versatile applications while tweaking them for a specific target audience or use case. An updated list of features and applications can be found on the documentation site.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Harnessing spatial homogeneity of neuroimaging data: patch individual filter layers for CNNs
Authors:
Fabian Eitel,
Jan Philipp Albrecht,
Martin Weygandt,
Friedemann Paul,
Kerstin Ritter
Abstract:
Neuroimaging data, e.g. obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is comparably homogeneous due to (1) the uniform structure of the brain and (2) additional efforts to spatially normalize the data to a standard template using linear and non-linear transformations. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in contrast, have been specifically designed for highly heterogeneous data, such as natural…
▽ More
Neuroimaging data, e.g. obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is comparably homogeneous due to (1) the uniform structure of the brain and (2) additional efforts to spatially normalize the data to a standard template using linear and non-linear transformations. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in contrast, have been specifically designed for highly heterogeneous data, such as natural images, by sliding convolutional filters over different positions in an image. Here, we suggest a new CNN architecture that combines the idea of hierarchical abstraction in neural networks with a prior on the spatial homogeneity of neuroimaging data: Whereas early layers are trained globally using standard convolutional layers, we introduce for higher, more abstract layers patch individual filters (PIF). By learning filters in individual image regions (patches) without sharing weights, PIF layers can learn abstract features faster and with fewer samples. We thoroughly evaluated PIF layers for three different tasks and data sets, namely sex classification on UK Biobank data, Alzheimer's disease detection on ADNI data and multiple sclerosis detection on private hospital data. We demonstrate that CNNs using PIF layers result in higher accuracies, especially in low sample size settings, and need fewer training epochs for convergence. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which introduces a prior on brain MRI for CNN learning.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
