-
Microtearing modes as the source of magnetic fluctuations in the JET pedestal
Authors:
D. R. Hatch,
M. Kotschenreuther,
S. M. Mahajan,
M. J. Pueschel,
C. Michoski,
G. Merlo,
E. Hassan,
A. R. Field,
L. Frassinetti,
C. Giroud,
J. C. Hillesheim,
C. F. Maggi,
C. Perez von Thun,
C. M. Roach,
S. Saarelma,
D. Jarema,
F. Jenko,
JET contributors
Abstract:
We report on a detailed study of magnetic fluctuations in the JET pedestal, employing basic theoretical considerations, gyrokinetic simulations, and experimental fluctuation data, to establish the physical basis for their origin, role, and distinctive characteristics. We demonstrate quantitative agreement between gyrokinetic simulations of microtearing modes (MTMs) and two magnetic frequency bands…
▽ More
We report on a detailed study of magnetic fluctuations in the JET pedestal, employing basic theoretical considerations, gyrokinetic simulations, and experimental fluctuation data, to establish the physical basis for their origin, role, and distinctive characteristics. We demonstrate quantitative agreement between gyrokinetic simulations of microtearing modes (MTMs) and two magnetic frequency bands with corresponding toroidal mode numbers n=4 and 8. Such disparate fluctuation scales, with substantial gaps between toroidal mode numbers, are commonly observed in pedestal fluctuations. Here we provide a clear explanation, namely the alignment of the relevant rational surfaces (and not others) with the peak in the omega star profile, which is localized in the steep gradient region of the pedestal. We demonstrate that a global treatment is required to capture this effect. Nonlinear simulations suggest that the MTM fluctuations produce experimentally-relevant transport levels and saturate by relaxing the background electron temperature gradient, slightly downshifting the fluctuation frequencies from the linear predictions. Scans in collisionality are compared with simple MTM dispersion relations. At the experimental points considered, MTM growth rates can either increase or decrease with collision frequency depending on the parameters thus defying any simple characterization of collisionality dependence.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Direct Gyrokinetic Comparison of Pedestal Transport in JET with Carbon and ITER-Like Walls
Authors:
D. R. Hatch,
M. Kotschenreuther,
S. M. Mahajan,
G. Merlo,
A. R. Field,
C. Giroud,
J. C. Hillesheim,
C. F. Maggi,
C. Perez von Thun,
C. M. Roach,
S. Saarelma
Abstract:
This paper compares the gyrokinetic instabilities and transport in two representative JET pedestals, one (pulse 78697) from the JET configuration with a carbon wall (C) and another (pulse 92432) from after the installation of JET's ITER-like Wall (ILW). The discharges were selected for a comparison of JET-ILW and JET-C discharges with good confinement at high current (3 MA, corresponding also to l…
▽ More
This paper compares the gyrokinetic instabilities and transport in two representative JET pedestals, one (pulse 78697) from the JET configuration with a carbon wall (C) and another (pulse 92432) from after the installation of JET's ITER-like Wall (ILW). The discharges were selected for a comparison of JET-ILW and JET-C discharges with good confinement at high current (3 MA, corresponding also to low $ρ_*$) and retain the distinguishing features of JET-C and JET-ILW, notably, decreased pedestal top temperature for JET-ILW. A comparison of the profiles and heating power reveals a stark qualitative difference between the discharges: the JET-ILW pulse (92432) requires twice the heating power, at a gas rate of $1.9 \times 10^{22}e/s$, to sustain roughly half the temperature gradient of the JET-C pulse (78697), operated at zero gas rate. This points to heat transport as a central component of the dynamics limiting the JET-ILW pedestal and reinforces the following emerging JET-ILW pedestal transport paradigm, which is proposed for further examination by both theory and experiment. ILW conditions modify the density pedestal in ways that decrease the normalized pedestal density gradient $a/L_n$, often via an outward shift of the density pedestal. This is attributable to some combination of direct metal wall effects and the need for increased fueling to mitigate tungsten contamination. The modification to the density profile increases $η= L_n/L_T$ , thereby producing more robust ion temperature gradient (ITG) and electron temperature gradient driven instability. The decreased pedestal gradients for JET-ILW (92432) also result in a strongly reduced $E \times B$ shear rate, further enhancing the ion scale turbulence. Collectively, these effects limit the pedestal temperature and demand more heating power to achieve good pedestal performance.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Energetic particle instabilities in fusion plasmas
Authors:
S E Sharapov,
B Alper,
H L Berk,
D N Borba,
B N Breizman,
C D Challis,
I G J Classen,
E M Edlund,
J Eriksson,
A Fasoli,
E D Fredrickson,
G Y Fu,
M Garcia-Munoz,
T Gassner,
K Ghantous,
V Goloborodko,
N N Gorelenkov,
M P Gryaznevich,
S Hacquin,
W W Heidbrink,
C Hellesen,
V G Kiptily,
G J Kramer,
P Lauber,
M K Lilley
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Remarkable progress has been made in diagnosing energetic particle instabilities on present-day machines and in establishing a theoretical framework for describing them. This overview describes the much improved diagnostics of Alfven instabilities and modelling tools developed world-wide, and discusses progress in interpreting the observed phenomena. A multi-machine comparison is presented giving…
▽ More
Remarkable progress has been made in diagnosing energetic particle instabilities on present-day machines and in establishing a theoretical framework for describing them. This overview describes the much improved diagnostics of Alfven instabilities and modelling tools developed world-wide, and discusses progress in interpreting the observed phenomena. A multi-machine comparison is presented giving information on the performance of both diagnostics and modelling tools for different plasma conditions outlining expectations for ITER based on our present knowledge.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
