First demonstration of in-beam performance of bent Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors
Authors:
ALICE ITS project,
:,
G. Aglieri Rinella,
M. Agnello,
B. Alessandro,
F. Agnese,
R. S. Akram,
J. Alme,
E. Anderssen,
D. Andreou,
F. Antinori,
N. Apadula,
P. Atkinson,
R. Baccomi,
A. Badalà,
A. Balbino,
C. Bartels,
R. Barthel,
F. Baruffaldi,
I. Belikov,
S. Beole,
P. Becht,
A. Bhatti,
M. Bhopal,
N. Bianchi
, et al. (230 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A novel approach for designing the next generation of vertex detectors foresees to employ wafer-scale sensors that can be bent to truly cylindrical geometries after thinning them to thicknesses of 20-40$μ$m. To solidify this concept, the feasibility of operating bent MAPS was demonstrated using 1.5$\times$3cm ALPIDE chips. Already with their thickness of 50$μ$m, they can be successfully bent to ra…
▽ More
A novel approach for designing the next generation of vertex detectors foresees to employ wafer-scale sensors that can be bent to truly cylindrical geometries after thinning them to thicknesses of 20-40$μ$m. To solidify this concept, the feasibility of operating bent MAPS was demonstrated using 1.5$\times$3cm ALPIDE chips. Already with their thickness of 50$μ$m, they can be successfully bent to radii of about 2cm without any signs of mechanical or electrical damage. During a subsequent characterisation using a 5.4GeV electron beam, it was further confirmed that they preserve their full electrical functionality as well as particle detection performance.
In this article, the bending procedure and the setup used for characterisation are detailed. Furthermore, the analysis of the beam test, including the measurement of the detection efficiency as a function of beam position and local inclination angle, is discussed. The results show that the sensors maintain their excellent performance after bending to radii of 2cm, with detection efficiencies above 99.9% at typical operating conditions, paving the way towards a new class of detectors with unprecedented low material budget and ideal geometrical properties.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2021; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
Charge collection properties of TowerJazz 180 nm CMOS Pixel Sensors in dependence of pixel geometries and bias parameters, studied using a dedicated test-vehicle: the Investigator chip
Authors:
G. Aglieri Rinella,
G. Chaosong,
A. di Mauro,
J. Eum,
H. Hillemanns,
A. Junique,
M. Keil,
D. Kim,
H. Kim,
T. Kugathasan,
S. Lee,
M. Mager,
V. Manzari,
C. A. Marin Tobon,
P. Martinengo,
H. Mugnier,
L. Musa,
F. Reidt,
J. Rousset,
K. Sielewicz,
W. Snoeys,
M. Šuljić,
J. W. van Hoorne,
Q. M. Waheed,
P. Yang
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper contains a compilation of parameters influencing the charge collection process extracted from a comprehensive study of partially depleted Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors with small (<25 um$^2$) collection electrodes fabricated in the TowerJazz 180 nm CMOS process. These results gave guidance for the optimisation of the diode implemented in ALPIDE, the chip used in the second generation…
▽ More
This paper contains a compilation of parameters influencing the charge collection process extracted from a comprehensive study of partially depleted Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors with small (<25 um$^2$) collection electrodes fabricated in the TowerJazz 180 nm CMOS process. These results gave guidance for the optimisation of the diode implemented in ALPIDE, the chip used in the second generation Inner Tracking System of ALICE, and serve as reference for future simulation studies of similar devices. The studied parameters include: reverse substrate bias, epitaxial layer thickness, charge collection electrode size and the spacing of the electrode to surrounding in-pixel electronics. The results from pixels of 28 um pitch confirm that even in partially depleted circuits, charge collection can be fast (<10 ns), and quantify the influence of the parameters onto the signal sharing and amplitudes, highlighting the importance of a correct spacing between wells and of the impact of the reverse substrate bias.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2020; v1 submitted 22 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
