Direct comparisons of European primary and secondary frequency standards via satellite techniques
Authors:
F. Riedel,
A. Al-Masoudi,
E. Benkler,
S. Dörscher,
V. Gerginov,
C. Grebing,
S. Häfner,
N. Huntemann,
B. Lipphardt,
C. Lisdat,
E. Peik,
D. Piester,
C. Sanner,
C. Tamm,
S. Weyers,
H. Denker,
L. Timmen,
C. Voigt,
D. Calonico,
G. Cerretto,
G. A. Costanzo,
F. Levi,
I. Sesia,
J. Achkar,
J. Guèna
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We carried out a 26-day comparison of five simultaneously operated optical clocks and six atomic fountain clocks located at INRIM, LNE-SYRTE, NPL and PTB by using two satellite-based frequency comparison techniques: broadband Two-Way Satellite Time and Frequency Transfer (TWSTFT) and Global Positioning System Precise Point Positioning (GPS PPP). With an enhanced statistical analysis procedure taki…
▽ More
We carried out a 26-day comparison of five simultaneously operated optical clocks and six atomic fountain clocks located at INRIM, LNE-SYRTE, NPL and PTB by using two satellite-based frequency comparison techniques: broadband Two-Way Satellite Time and Frequency Transfer (TWSTFT) and Global Positioning System Precise Point Positioning (GPS PPP). With an enhanced statistical analysis procedure taking into account correlations and gaps in the measurement data, combined overall uncertainties in the range of $1.8 \times 10^{-16}$ to $3.5 \times 10^{-16}$ for the optical clock comparisons were found. The comparison of the fountain clocks yields results with a maximum relative frequency difference of $6.9 \times 10^{-16}$, and combined overall uncertainties in the range of $4.8 \times 10^{-16}$ to $7.7 \times 10^{-16}$.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
Frequency comparison of ${}^{171}$Yb${}^+$ ion optical clocks at PTB and NPL via GPS PPP
Authors:
J. Leute,
N. Huntemann,
B. Lipphardt,
Chr. Tamm,
P. B. R. Nisbet-Jones,
S. A. King,
R. M. Godun,
J. M. Jones,
H. S. Margolis,
P. B. Whibberley,
A. Wallin,
M. Merimaa,
P. Gill,
E. Peik
Abstract:
We used Precise Point Positioning, a well-established GPS carrier-phase frequency transfer method to perform a direct remote comparison of two optical frequency standards based on single laser-cooled $^{171}$Yb$^+$ ions operated at NPL, UK and PTB, Germany. At both institutes an active hydrogen maser serves as a flywheel oscillator; it is connected to a GPS receiver as an external frequency refere…
▽ More
We used Precise Point Positioning, a well-established GPS carrier-phase frequency transfer method to perform a direct remote comparison of two optical frequency standards based on single laser-cooled $^{171}$Yb$^+$ ions operated at NPL, UK and PTB, Germany. At both institutes an active hydrogen maser serves as a flywheel oscillator; it is connected to a GPS receiver as an external frequency reference and compared simultaneously to a realization of the unperturbed frequency of the ${{}^2S_{1/2}(F=0)-{}^2D_{3/2}(F=2)}$ electric quadrupole transition in ${}^{171}$Yb${}^+$ via an optical femtosecond frequency comb. To profit from long coherent GPS link measurements we extrapolate over the various data gaps in the optical clock to maser comparisons which introduces maser noise to the frequency comparison but improves the uncertainty from the GPS link. We determined the total statistical uncertainty consisting of the GPS link uncertainty and the extrapolation uncertainties for several extrapolation schemes. Using the extrapolation scheme with the smallest combined uncertainty, we find a fractional frequency difference $y(\mathrm{PTB})-y(\mathrm{NPL})$ of $-1.3(1.2)\times 10^{-15}$ for a total measurement time of 67 h. This result is consistent with an agreement of both optical clocks and with recent absolute frequency measurements against caesium fountain clocks.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
