-
A self-referenced in-situ arrival time monitor for X-ray free-electron lasers
Authors:
Michael Diez,
Andreas Galler,
Sebastian Schulz,
Christina Boemer,
Ryan N. Coffee,
Nick Hartmann,
Rupert Heider,
Martin S. Wagner,
Wolfram Helml,
Tetsuo Katayama,
Tokushi Sato,
Takahiro Sato,
Makina Yabashi,
Christian Bressler
Abstract:
We present a novel, highly versatile, and self-referenced arrival time monitor for measuring the femtosecond time delay between a hard X-ray pulse from a free-electron laser and an optical laser pulse, measured directly on the same sample used for pump-probe experiments. Two chirped and picosecond long optical supercontinuum pulses traverse the sample with a mutually fixed time delay of 970 fs, wh…
▽ More
We present a novel, highly versatile, and self-referenced arrival time monitor for measuring the femtosecond time delay between a hard X-ray pulse from a free-electron laser and an optical laser pulse, measured directly on the same sample used for pump-probe experiments. Two chirped and picosecond long optical supercontinuum pulses traverse the sample with a mutually fixed time delay of 970 fs, while a femtosecond X-ray pulse arrives at an instant in between both pulses. Behind the sample the supercontinuum pulses are temporally overlapped to yield near-perfect destructive interference in the absence of the X-ray pulse. Stimulation of the sample with an X-ray pulse delivers non-zero contributions at certain optical wavelengths, which serve as a measure of the relative arrival time of the X-ray pulse with an accuracy of better than 25 fs. We find an excellent agreement of our monitor with the existing timing diagnostics at the SACLA XFEL with a Pearson correlation value of 0.98. We demonstrate a high sensitivity to measure X-ray pulses with pulse energies as low as 30 $μ$J. Using a free-flowing liquid jet as interaction sample ensures the full replacement of the sample volume for each X-ray/optical event, thus enabling its utility even at MHz repetition rate XFEL sources.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2021; v1 submitted 25 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
On the nuclear halo of a proton pencil beam stopping in water
Authors:
Bernard Gottschalk,
Ethan W. Cascio,
Juliane Daartz,
Miles S. Wagner
Abstract:
The dose distribution of a pencil beam in water consists of a core, a halo, an aura and (possibly) spray. The core is due to primary protons which suffer multiple Coulomb scattering (MCS) and slow down by multiple collisions with atomic electrons (Bethe-Bloch theory). The halo is due to charged secondaries, many of them protons, from elastic interactions with H, elastic and inelastic interactions…
▽ More
The dose distribution of a pencil beam in water consists of a core, a halo, an aura and (possibly) spray. The core is due to primary protons which suffer multiple Coulomb scattering (MCS) and slow down by multiple collisions with atomic electrons (Bethe-Bloch theory). The halo is due to charged secondaries, many of them protons, from elastic interactions with H, elastic and inelastic interactions with O, and nonelastic interactions with O. We show that the halo radius is roughly one third of the beam range. The aura is due to neutral secondaries (neutrons and gamma rays). Spray denotes dose, avoidable in principle, coming in from the beam line.
We have measured the absolute dose at 177 MeV using a test beam in a water tank. The beam monitor was a PPIC 'proton counter' and the field IC a dose calibrated Exradin T1. We took depth-dose scans at ten displacements from the beam axis ranging from 0 to 10 cm. The dose spans five orders of magnitude, and the transition from halo to aura is obvious.
We present model-dependent (MD) and model-independent (MI) fits to these data. The MD fit has 25 parameters, and the goodness of fit (rms (measurement/fit) - 1) is 15%. The MI fit uses cubic spline fits in depth and radius. The goodness of fit is 9%. This fit is more portable and conceptually simpler.
We discuss the prevalent parameterization of the core/halo originated by the PSI group. We argue that its use of T(w), a mass stopping power which includes energy deposited by nuclear secondaries, is incorrect. The electromagnetic (Bethe-Bloch) mass stopping power should be used instead. In consequence, 'Bragg peak chamber' measurements and associated corrections are, in our view, irrelevant. Furthermore, using T(w) leads to spurious excess dose on the axis of the core around midrange, which may be significant in fields involving relatively few pencil beams.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2015; v1 submitted 28 November, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Nuclear halo of a 177 MeV proton beam in water: theory, measurement and parameterization
Authors:
Bernard Gottschalk,
Ethan W. Cascio,
Juliane Daartz,
Miles S. Wagner
Abstract:
The dose distribution of a monoenergetic pencil beam in water consists of an electromagnetic "core", a "halo" from charged nuclear secondaries, and a much larger "aura" from neutral secondaries. These regions overlap, but each has distinct spatial characteristics.
We have measured the core/halo using a 177MeV test beam offset in a water tank. The beam monitor was a fluence calibrated plane paral…
▽ More
The dose distribution of a monoenergetic pencil beam in water consists of an electromagnetic "core", a "halo" from charged nuclear secondaries, and a much larger "aura" from neutral secondaries. These regions overlap, but each has distinct spatial characteristics.
We have measured the core/halo using a 177MeV test beam offset in a water tank. The beam monitor was a fluence calibrated plane parallel ionization chamber (IC) and the field chamber, a dose calibrated Exradin T1, so the dose measurements are absolute (MeV/g/p). We performed depth-dose scans at ten displacements from the beam axis ranging from 0 to 10cm. The dose spans five orders of magnitude, and the transition from halo to aura is clearly visible.
We have performed model-dependent (MD) and model-independent (MI) fits to the data. The MD fit separates the dose into core, elastic/inelastic nuclear, nonelastic nuclear and aura terms, and achieves a global rms measurement/fit ratio of 15%. The MI fit uses cubic splines and the same ratio is 9%.
We review the literature, in particular the use of Pedroni's parametrization of the core/halo. Several papers improve on his Gaussian transverse distribution of the halo, but all retain his T(w), the radial integral of the depth-dose multiplying both the core and halo terms and motivating measurements with large "Bragg peak chambers" (BPCs).
We argue that this use of T(w), which by its definition includes energy deposition by nuclear secondaries, is incorrect. T(w) should be replaced in the core term, and in at least part of the halo, by a purely electromagnetic mass stopping power. BPC measurements are unnecessary, and irrelevant to parameterizing the pencil beam.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
