Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Strauch, S

The MUSE Beamline Calorimeter

Authors: W. Lin, T. Rostomyan, R. Gilman, S. Strauch, C. Meier, C. Nestler, M. Ali, H. Atac, J. C. Bernauer, W. J. Briscoe, A. Christopher Ndukwe, E. W. Cline, K. Deiters, S. Dogra, E. J. Downie, Z. Duan, I. P. Fernando, A. Flannery, D. Ghosal, A. Golossanov, J. Guo, N. S. Ifat, Y. Ilieva, M. Kohl, I. Lavrukhin , et al. (18 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The MUon Scattering Experiment (MUSE) was motivated by the proton radius puzzle arising from the discrepancy between muonic hydrogen spectroscopy and electron-proton measurements. The MUSE physics goals also include testing lepton universality, precisely measuring two-photon exchange contribution, and testing radiative corrections. MUSE addresses these physics goals through simultaneous measuremen… ▽ More The MUon Scattering Experiment (MUSE) was motivated by the proton radius puzzle arising from the discrepancy between muonic hydrogen spectroscopy and electron-proton measurements. The MUSE physics goals also include testing lepton universality, precisely measuring two-photon exchange contribution, and testing radiative corrections. MUSE addresses these physics goals through simultaneous measurement of high precision cross sections for electron-proton and muon-proton scattering using a mixed-species beam. The experiment will run at both positive and negative beam polarities. Measuring precise cross sections requires understanding both the incident beam energy and the radiative corrections. For this purpose, a lead-glass calorimeter was installed at the end of the beam line in the MUSE detector system. In this article we discuss the detector specifications, calibration and performance. We demonstrate that the detector performance is well reproduced by simulation, and meets experimental requirements. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

Blinding for precision scattering experiments: The MUSE approach as a case study

Authors: J. C. Bernauer, E. W. Cline, H. Atac, W. J. Briscoe, A. Christopher Ndukwe, E. J. Downie, I. P. Fernando, T. Gautam, R. Gilman, R. Goldin, M. Kohl, I. Lavrukhin, W. Lin, W. Lorenzon, P. Mohanmurthy, S. J. Nazeer, M. Nicol, T. Patel, A. Prosnyakov, R. D. Ransome, R. Ratvasky, H. Reid, P. E. Reimer, G. Ron, T. Rostomyan , et al. (5 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Human bias is capable of changing the analysis of measured data sufficiently to alter the results of an experiment. It is incumbent upon modern experiments, especially those investigating quantities considered contentious in the broader community, to blind their analysis in an effort to minimize bias. The choice of a blinding model is experiment specific, but should also aim to prevent accidental… ▽ More Human bias is capable of changing the analysis of measured data sufficiently to alter the results of an experiment. It is incumbent upon modern experiments, especially those investigating quantities considered contentious in the broader community, to blind their analysis in an effort to minimize bias. The choice of a blinding model is experiment specific, but should also aim to prevent accidental release of results before an analysis is finalized. In this paper, we discuss common threats to an unbiased analysis, as well as common quantities that can be blinded in different types of nuclear physics experiments. We use the Muon Scattering Experiment as an example, and detail the blinding scheme used therein. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures

Alignment of the CLAS12 central hybrid tracker with a Kalman Filter

Authors: S. J. Paul, A. Peck, M. Arratia, Y. Gotra, V. Ziegler, R. De Vita, F. Bossu, M. Defurne, H. Atac, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, L. Baashen, N. A. Baltzell, L. Barion, M. Bashkanov, M. Battaglieri, I. Bedlinskiy, B. Benkel, F. Benmokhtar, A. Bianconi, L. Biondo, A. S. Biselli, M. Bondi, S. Boiarinov, K. Th. Brinkmann, W. J. Briscoe , et al. (109 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Several factors can contribute to the difficulty of aligning the sensors of tracking detectors, including a large number of modules, multiple types of detector technologies, and non-linear strip patterns on the sensors. All three of these factors apply to the CLAS12 CVT, which is a hybrid detector consisting of planar silicon sensors with non-parallel strips, and cylindrical micromegas sensors wit… ▽ More Several factors can contribute to the difficulty of aligning the sensors of tracking detectors, including a large number of modules, multiple types of detector technologies, and non-linear strip patterns on the sensors. All three of these factors apply to the CLAS12 CVT, which is a hybrid detector consisting of planar silicon sensors with non-parallel strips, and cylindrical micromegas sensors with longitudinal and arc-shaped strips located within a 5~T superconducting solenoid. To align this detector, we used the Kalman Alignment Algorithm, which accounts for correlations between the alignment parameters without requiring the time-consuming inversion of large matrices. This is the first time that this algorithm has been adapted for use with hybrid technologies, non-parallel strips, and curved sensors. We present the results for the first alignment of the CLAS12 CVT using straight tracks from cosmic rays and from a target with the magnetic field turned off. After running this procedure, we achieved alignment at the level of 10~$μ$m, and the widths of the residual spectra were greatly reduced. These results attest to the flexibility of this algorithm and its applicability to future use in the CLAS12 CVT and other hybrid or curved trackers, such as those proposed for the future Electron-Ion Collider. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Journal ref: Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A 1049 (2023) 168032

Characterization of Muon and Electron Beams in the Paul Scherrer Institute PiM1 Channel for the MUSE Experiment

Authors: E. Cline, W. Lin, P. Roy, P. E. Reimer, K. E. Mesick, A. Akmal, A. Alie, H. Atac, A. Atencio, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, N. Benmouna, F. Benmokhtar, J. C. Bernauer, W. J. Briscoe, J. Campbell, D. Cohen, E. O. Cohen, C. Collicott, K. Deiters, S. Dogra, E. Downie, I. P. Fernando, A. Flannery, T. Gautam, D. Ghosal , et al. (35 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The MUon Scattering Experiment, MUSE, at the Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland, investigates the proton charge radius puzzle, lepton universality, and two-photon exchange, via simultaneous measurements of elastic muon-proton and electron-proton scattering. The experiment uses the PiM1 secondary beam channel, which was designed for high precision pion scattering measurements. We review the prope… ▽ More The MUon Scattering Experiment, MUSE, at the Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland, investigates the proton charge radius puzzle, lepton universality, and two-photon exchange, via simultaneous measurements of elastic muon-proton and electron-proton scattering. The experiment uses the PiM1 secondary beam channel, which was designed for high precision pion scattering measurements. We review the properties of the beam line established for pions. We discuss the production processes that generate the electron and muon beams, and the simulations of these processes. Simulations of the $π$/$μ$/$e$ beams through the channel using TURTLE and G4beamline are compared. The G4beamline simulation is then compared to several experimental measurements of the channel, including the momentum dispersion at the IFP and target, the shape of the beam spot at the target, and timing measurements that allow the beam momenta to be determined. We conclude that the PiM1 channel can be used for high precision $π$, $μ$, and $e$ scattering. △ Less

Submitted 15 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 20 pages, 18 figures

Timing Detectors with SiPM read-out for the MUSE Experiment at PSI

Authors: Tigran Rostomyan, Ethan Cline, Ievgen Lavrukhin, Hamza Atac, Ariella Atencio, Jan C. Bernauer, William J. Briscoe, Dan Cohen, Erez O. Cohen, Cristina Collicott, Konrad Deiters, Shraddha Dogra, Evangeline Downie, Werner Erni, Ishara P. Fernando, Anne Flannery, Thir Gautam, Debdeep Ghosal, Ronald Gilman, Alexander Golossanov, Jack Hirschman, Minjung Kim, Michael Kohl, Bernd Krusche, Lin Li , et al. (18 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Muon Scattering Experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institut uses a mixed beam of electrons, muons, and pions, necessitating precise timing to identify the beam particles and reactions they cause. We describe the design and performance of three timing detectors using plastic scintillator read out with silicon photomultipliers that have been built for the experiment. The Beam Hodoscope, upstream of… ▽ More The Muon Scattering Experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institut uses a mixed beam of electrons, muons, and pions, necessitating precise timing to identify the beam particles and reactions they cause. We describe the design and performance of three timing detectors using plastic scintillator read out with silicon photomultipliers that have been built for the experiment. The Beam Hodoscope, upstream of the scattering target, counts the beam flux and precisely times beam particles both to identify species and provide a starting time for time-of-flight measurements. The Beam Monitor, downstream of the scattering target, counts the unscattered beam flux, helps identify background in scattering events, and precisely times beam particles for time-of-flight measurements. The Beam Focus Monitor, mounted on the target ladder under the liquid hydrogen target inside the target vacuum chamber, is used in dedicated runs to sample the beam spot at three points near the target center, where the beam should be focused. △ Less

Submitted 15 October, 2020; v1 submitted 23 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Fixed typos, added references, and rephrased some sections to be clearer. Changed numbering of tables and figures in Appendix

Journal ref: Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 986 (2021) 164801

Technical Design Report for the Paul Scherrer Institute Experiment R-12-01.1: Studying the Proton "Radius" Puzzle with μp Elastic Scattering

Authors: R. Gilman, E. J. Downie, G. Ron, S. Strauch, A. Afanasev, A. Akmal, J. Arrington, H. Atac, C. Ayerbe-Gayoso, F. Benmokhtar, N. Benmouna, J. Bernauer, A. Blomberg, W. J. Briscoe, D. Cioffi, E. Cline, D. Cohen, E. O. Cohen, C. Collicott, K. Deiters, J. Diefenbach, B. Dongwi, D. Ghosal, A. Golossanov, R. Gothe , et al. (34 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The difference in proton radii measured with $μp$ atoms and with $ep$ atoms and scattering remains an unexplained puzzle. The PSI MUSE proposal is to measure $μp$ and $e p$ scattering in the same experiment at the same time. The experiment will determine cross sections, two-photon effects, form factors, and radii independently for the two reactions, and will allow $μp$ and $ep$ results to be compa… ▽ More The difference in proton radii measured with $μp$ atoms and with $ep$ atoms and scattering remains an unexplained puzzle. The PSI MUSE proposal is to measure $μp$ and $e p$ scattering in the same experiment at the same time. The experiment will determine cross sections, two-photon effects, form factors, and radii independently for the two reactions, and will allow $μp$ and $ep$ results to be compared with reduced systematic uncertainties. These data should provide the best test of lepton universality in a scattering experiment to date, about an order of magnitude improvement over previous tests. Measuring scattering with both particle polarities will allow a test of two-photon exchange at the sub-percent level, about a factor of four improvement on uncertainties and over an order of magnitude more data points than previous low momentum transfer determinations, and similar to the current generation of higher momentum transfer electron experiments. The experiment has the potential to demonstrate whether the $μp$ and $ep$ interactions are consistent or different, and whether any difference results from novel physics or two-photon exchange. The uncertainties are such that if the discrepancy is real it should be confirmed with $\approx$5$σ$ significance, similar to that already established between the regular and muonic hydrogen Lamb shift. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy using a laser-driven field emitter: femtosecond resolution with a high coherence electron beam

Authors: Armin Feist, Nora Bach, Nara Rubiano da Silva, Thomas Danz, Marcel Möller, Katharina E. Priebe, Till Domröse, J. Gregor Gatzmann, Stefan Rost, Jakob Schauss, Stefanie Strauch, Reiner Bormann, Murat Sivis, Sascha Schäfer, Claus Ropers

Abstract: We present the development of the first ultrafast transmission electron microscope (UTEM) driven by localized photoemission from a field emitter cathode. We describe the implementation of the instrument, the photoemitter concept and the quantitative electron beam parameters achieved. Establishing a new source for ultrafast TEM, the Göttingen UTEM employs nano-localized linear photoemission from a… ▽ More We present the development of the first ultrafast transmission electron microscope (UTEM) driven by localized photoemission from a field emitter cathode. We describe the implementation of the instrument, the photoemitter concept and the quantitative electron beam parameters achieved. Establishing a new source for ultrafast TEM, the Göttingen UTEM employs nano-localized linear photoemission from a Schottky emitter, which enables operation with freely tunable temporal structure, from continuous wave to femtosecond pulsed mode. Using this emission mechanism, we achieve record pulse properties in ultrafast electron microscopy of 9 Å focused beam diameter, 200 fs pulse duration and 0.6 eV energy width. We illustrate the possibility to conduct ultrafast imaging, diffraction, holography and spectroscopy with this instrument and also discuss opportunities to harness quantum coherent interactions between intense laser fields and free electron beams. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Journal ref: Ultramicroscopy 176 (2017) 63-73