Calibration and localization of optically pumped magnetometers using electromagnetic coils
Authors:
Joonas Iivanainen,
Amir Borna,
Rasmus Zetter,
Tony R. Carter,
Julia M. Stephen,
Jim McKay,
Lauri Parkkonen,
Samu Taulu,
Peter D. D. Schwindt
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose a method to estimate the position, orientation and gain of a magnetic field sensor using a set of (large) electromagnetic coils. We apply the method for calibrating an array of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) for magnetoencephalography (MEG). We first measure the magnetic fields of the coils at multiple known positions using a well-calibrated triaxial magnetometer a…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose a method to estimate the position, orientation and gain of a magnetic field sensor using a set of (large) electromagnetic coils. We apply the method for calibrating an array of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) for magnetoencephalography (MEG). We first measure the magnetic fields of the coils at multiple known positions using a well-calibrated triaxial magnetometer and model these discreetly sampled fields using vector-spherical harmonics (VSH) functions. We then localize and calibrate a sensor by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the model signals and the sensor responses to the coil fields. We show that by using homogeneous and first-order gradient fields, the sensor parameters (gain, position, and orientation) can be obtained from a set of linear equations with pseudo-inverses of two matrices. By determining the coil currents based on the VSH models, the coil fields can approximate these low-order field components, yielding computationally simple initial estimates of the sensor parameters. As a first test of the method, we placed a fluxgate magnetometer at multiple positions and estimated the RMS position, orientation, and gain errors of the method to be 1.0 mm, 0.2° and 0.8%, respectively. Last, we calibrated a 48-channel OPM array. The accuracy of the OPM calibration was tested by using the OPM array to localize magnetic dipoles in a phantom, which resulted in an average position error of 3.3 mm. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using electromagnetic coils to calibrate and localize OPMs for MEG.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
Non-Invasive Functional-Brain-Imaging with a Novel Magnetoencephalography System
Authors:
Amir Borna,
Tony R. Carter,
Anthony P. Colombo,
Yuan-Yu Jau,
Jim McKay,
Michael Weisend,
Samu Taulu,
Julia M. Stephen,
Peter D. D. Schwindt
Abstract:
A non-invasive functional-brain-imaging system based on optically-pumped-magnetometers (OPM) is presented. The OPM-based magnetoencephalography (MEG) system features 20 OPM channels conforming to the subject's scalp. Due to proximity (12 mm) of the OPM channels to the brain, it is anticipated that this MEG system offers an enhanced spatial resolution as it can capture finer spatial features compar…
▽ More
A non-invasive functional-brain-imaging system based on optically-pumped-magnetometers (OPM) is presented. The OPM-based magnetoencephalography (MEG) system features 20 OPM channels conforming to the subject's scalp. Due to proximity (12 mm) of the OPM channels to the brain, it is anticipated that this MEG system offers an enhanced spatial resolution as it can capture finer spatial features compared to traditional MEG systems employing superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). We have conducted two MEG experiments on three subjects: somatosensory evoked magnetic field (SEF) and auditory evoked magnetic field (AEF) using our OPM-based MEG system and a commercial SQUID-based MEG system. We have cross validated the robustness of our system by calculating the distance between the location of the equivalent current dipole (ECD) yielded by our OPM-based MEG system and the ECD location calculated by the commercial SQUID-based MEG system. We achieved sub-centimeter accuracy for both SEF and AEF responses in all three subjects.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
