A summary of the Planck constant measurements using a watt balance with a superconducting solenoid at NIST
Authors:
S. Schlamminger,
R. L. Steiner,
D. Haddad,
D. B. Newell,
F. Seifert,
L. S. Chao,
R. Liu,
E. R. Williams,
J. R. Pratt
Abstract:
Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have been using a watt balance, NIST-3, to measure the Planck constant $h$ for over ten years. Two recently published values disagree by more than one standard uncertainty. The motivation for the present manuscript is twofold. First, we correct the latest published number to take into account a recently discovered systematic error i…
▽ More
Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have been using a watt balance, NIST-3, to measure the Planck constant $h$ for over ten years. Two recently published values disagree by more than one standard uncertainty. The motivation for the present manuscript is twofold. First, we correct the latest published number to take into account a recently discovered systematic error in mass dissemination at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). Second, we provide guidance on how to combine the two numbers into one final result. In order to adequately reflect the discrepancy, we added an additional systematic uncertainty to the published uncertainty budgets. The final value of $h$ measured with NIST-3 is $h = 6.626\,069\,36(37)\times 10^{-34}\,\mbox{J\,s}$. This result is $77(57) \times 10^{-9}$ fractionally higher than $h_{\mathrm{90}}$. Each number in parentheses gives the value of the standard uncertainty in the last two digits of the respective value and $h_{\mathrm{90}}$ is the conventional value of the Planck constant given by $h_{\mathrm{90}}\equiv 4 /( K_{\mathrm{J-90}}^2 R_{\mathrm{K-90}})$, where $K_{\mathrm{J-90}}$ and $R_{\mathrm{K-90}}$ denote the conventional values of the Josephson and von Klitzing constants, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
Determination of the Planck constant using a watt balance with a superconducting magnet system at the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Authors:
Stephan Schlamminger,
Darine Haddad,
Frank Seifert,
Leon S Chao,
David B Newell,
Ruimin Liu,
Richard L Steiner,
Jon R Pratt
Abstract:
For the past two years, measurements have been performed with a watt balance at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to determine the Planck constant. A detailed analysis of these measurements and their uncertainties has led to the value $h=6.626\,069\,79(30)\times 10^{-34}\,$J$\,$s. The relative standard uncertainty is $ 45\times 10^{-9}$. This result is $141\times 10^{-9}$ f…
▽ More
For the past two years, measurements have been performed with a watt balance at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to determine the Planck constant. A detailed analysis of these measurements and their uncertainties has led to the value $h=6.626\,069\,79(30)\times 10^{-34}\,$J$\,$s. The relative standard uncertainty is $ 45\times 10^{-9}$. This result is $141\times 10^{-9}$ fractionally higher than $h_{90}$. Here $h_{90}$ is the conventional value of the Planck constant given by $h_{90}\equiv 4 /( K_{\mathrm{J-90}}^2R_{\mathrm{K-90}})$, where $K_{\mathrm{J-90}}$ and $R_{\mathrm{K-90}}$ denote the conventional values of the Josephson and von Klitzing constants, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2014; v1 submitted 31 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
