Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Small, A R
-
Range restriction, admissions criteria, and correlation studies of standardized tests
Authors:
Alexander R. Small
Abstract:
Recent and influential critiques of standardized testing have noted the existence of non-trivial numbers of successful scientists who received low scores on the GRE. Here we use computer simulations to show that the prevalence of such examples is consistent with the reasonable hypothesis that academic performance depends on multiple variables. We examine the effects of admissions criteria on the o…
▽ More
Recent and influential critiques of standardized testing have noted the existence of non-trivial numbers of successful scientists who received low scores on the GRE. Here we use computer simulations to show that the prevalence of such examples is consistent with the reasonable hypothesis that academic performance depends on multiple variables. We examine the effects of admissions criteria on the observed predictive power of different variables, and show that observed correlations between student performance and student characteristics depend as much on the method of selecting students as on causal relationships detectable in the wider applicant pool. This is an example of the well-known statistical phenomenon of range restriction, and we offer relevant caveats and recommendations for further studies of admissions tests. We also show that the magnitude of range restriction effects depend on how student characteristics are weighted in admissions decisions.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Theoretical Limits on Errors and Acquisition Rates in Localizing Switchable Fluorophores
Authors:
Alexander R. Small
Abstract:
A variety of recent imaging techniques are able to beat the diffraction limit in fluorescence microcopy by activating and localizing subsets of the fluorescent molecules in the specimen, and repeating this process until all of the molecules have been imaged. In these techniques there is a tradeoff between speed (activating more molecules per imaging cycle) and error rates (activating more molecule…
▽ More
A variety of recent imaging techniques are able to beat the diffraction limit in fluorescence microcopy by activating and localizing subsets of the fluorescent molecules in the specimen, and repeating this process until all of the molecules have been imaged. In these techniques there is a tradeoff between speed (activating more molecules per imaging cycle) and error rates (activating more molecules risks producing overlapping images that hide information on molecular positions), and so intelligent image-processing approaches are needed to identify and reject overlapping images. We introduce here a formalism for defining error rates, derive a general relationship between error rates, image acquisition rates, and the performance characteristics of the image processing algorithms, and show that there is a minimum acquisition time irrespective of algorithm performance. We also consider algorithms that can infer molecular positions from images of overlapping blurs, and derive the dependence of the minimimum acquisition time on algorithm performance.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2010; v1 submitted 23 September, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
