-
Self-similarity in pandemic spread and fractal containment policies
Authors:
Alexander F. Siegenfeld,
Asier PiƱeiro Orioli,
Robin Na,
Blake Elias,
Yaneer Bar-Yam
Abstract:
Although pandemics are often studied as if populations are well-mixed, disease transmission networks exhibit a multi-scale structure stretching from the individual all the way up to the entire globe. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an intense debate about whether interventions should prioritize public health or the economy, leading to a surge of studies analyzing the health and economic costs of…
▽ More
Although pandemics are often studied as if populations are well-mixed, disease transmission networks exhibit a multi-scale structure stretching from the individual all the way up to the entire globe. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an intense debate about whether interventions should prioritize public health or the economy, leading to a surge of studies analyzing the health and economic costs of various response strategies. Here we show that describing disease transmission in a self-similar (fractal) manner across multiple geographic scales allows for the design of multi-scale containment measures that substantially reduce both these costs. We characterize response strategies using multi-scale reproduction numbers -- a generalization of the basic reproduction number $R_0$ -- that describe pandemic spread at multiple levels of scale and provide robust upper bounds on disease transmission. Stable elimination is guaranteed if there exists a scale such that the reproduction number among regions of that scale is less than $1$, even if the basic reproduction number $R_0$ is greater than $1$. We support our theoretical results using simulations of a heterogeneous SIS model for disease spread in the United States constructed using county-level commuting, air travel, and population data.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Quantitative errors in the Cochrane review on "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses"
Authors:
Yaneer Bar-Yam,
Jonathan M. Samet,
Alexander F. Siegenfeld,
Nassim N. Taleb
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the urgency to understand and prevent pathogen transmission, specifically regarding infectious airborne particles. Extensive studies validate the understanding of larger (droplets) and smaller (aerosols) particles in disease transmission. Similarly, N95 respirators, and other forms of respiratory protection, have proven efficacy in reducing the risk of infectio…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the urgency to understand and prevent pathogen transmission, specifically regarding infectious airborne particles. Extensive studies validate the understanding of larger (droplets) and smaller (aerosols) particles in disease transmission. Similarly, N95 respirators, and other forms of respiratory protection, have proven efficacy in reducing the risk of infection across various environments. Even though multiple studies confirm their protective effect when adopted in healthcare and public settings for infection prevention, studies on their adoption over the last several decades in both clinical trials and observational studies have not provided as clear an understanding. Here we show that the standard analytical equations used in the analysis of these studies do not accurately represent the random variables impacting study results. By correcting these equations, it is demonstrated that conclusions drawn from these studies are heavily biased and uncertain, providing little useful information. Despite these limitations, we show that when outcome measures are properly analyzed, existing results consistently point to the benefit of N95 respirators over medical masks, and masking over its absence. Correcting errors in widely reported meta-analyses also yields statistically significant estimates. These findings have important implications for study design and using existing evidence for infection control policy guidelines.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
How Democracies Polarize: A Multilevel Perspective
Authors:
Sihao Huang,
Alexander F. Siegenfeld,
Andrew Gelman
Abstract:
Democracies employ elections at various scales to select officials at the corresponding levels of administration. The geographical distribution of political opinion, the policy issues delegated to each level, and the multilevel interactions between elections can all greatly impact the makeup of these representative bodies. This perspective is not new: the adoption of federal systems has been motiv…
▽ More
Democracies employ elections at various scales to select officials at the corresponding levels of administration. The geographical distribution of political opinion, the policy issues delegated to each level, and the multilevel interactions between elections can all greatly impact the makeup of these representative bodies. This perspective is not new: the adoption of federal systems has been motivated by the idea that they possess desirable traits not provided by democracies on a single scale. Yet most existing models of polarization do not capture how nested local and national elections interact with heterogeneous political geographies. We begin by developing a framework to describe the multilevel distribution of opinions and analyze the flow of variance among geographic scales, applying it to historical data in the United States from 1912 to 2020. We describe how unstable elections can arise due to the spatial distribution of opinions and how tradeoffs occur between national and local elections. We also examine multi-dimensional spaces of political opinion, for which we show that a decrease in local salience can constrain the dimensions along which elections occur, preventing a federal system from serving as an effective safeguard against polarization. These analyses, based on the interactions between elections and opinion distributions at various scales, offer insights into how democracies can be strengthened to mitigate polarization and increase electoral representation.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
A Formal Definition of Scale-dependent Complexity and the Multi-scale Law of Requisite Variety
Authors:
Alexander F. Siegenfeld,
Yaneer Bar-Yam
Abstract:
Ashby's law of requisite variety allows a comparison of systems with their environments, providing a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for system efficacy: a system must possess at least as much complexity as any set of environmental behaviors that require distinct responses from the system. However, to account for the dependence of a system's complexity on the level of detail -- or scale -…
▽ More
Ashby's law of requisite variety allows a comparison of systems with their environments, providing a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for system efficacy: a system must possess at least as much complexity as any set of environmental behaviors that require distinct responses from the system. However, to account for the dependence of a system's complexity on the level of detail -- or scale -- of its description, a multi-scale generalization of Ashby's law is needed. We define a class of complexity profiles (complexity as a function of scale) that is the first, to our knowledge, to exhibit a multi-scale law of requisite variety. This formalism provides a characterization of multi-scale complexity and generalizes the law of requisite variety's single constraint on system behaviors to a class of multi-scale constraints. We show that these complexity profiles satisfy a sum rule, which reflects a tradeoff between smaller- and larger-scale degrees of freedom, and we extend our results to subdivided systems and systems with a continuum of components.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2025; v1 submitted 10 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
An Introduction to Complex Systems Science and its Applications
Authors:
Alexander F. Siegenfeld,
Yaneer Bar-Yam
Abstract:
The standard assumptions that underlie many conceptual and quantitative frameworks do not hold for many complex physical, biological, and social systems. Complex systems science clarifies when and why such assumptions fail and provides alternative frameworks for understanding the properties of complex systems. This review introduces some of the basic principles of complex systems science, includin…
▽ More
The standard assumptions that underlie many conceptual and quantitative frameworks do not hold for many complex physical, biological, and social systems. Complex systems science clarifies when and why such assumptions fail and provides alternative frameworks for understanding the properties of complex systems. This review introduces some of the basic principles of complex systems science, including complexity profiles, the tradeoff between efficiency and adaptability, the necessity of matching the complexity of systems to that of their environments, multi-scale analysis, and evolutionary processes. Our focus is on the general properties of systems as opposed to the modeling of specific dynamics; rather than provide a comprehensive review, we pedagogically describe a conceptual and analytic approach for understanding and interacting with the complex systems of our world. With the exception of a few footnotes, this paper assumes only a high school mathematical and scientific background, so that it may be accessible to academics in all fields, decision-makers in industry, government, and philanthropy, and anyone who is interested in systems and society.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2020; v1 submitted 10 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Negative Representation and Instability in Democratic Elections
Authors:
Alexander Siegenfeld,
Yaneer Bar-Yam
Abstract:
The challenge of understanding the collective behaviors of social systems can benefit from methods and concepts from physics [1-6], not because humans are similar to electrons, but because certain large-scale behaviors can be understood without an understanding of the small-scale details [7], in much the same way that sound waves can be understood without an understanding of atoms. Democratic elec…
▽ More
The challenge of understanding the collective behaviors of social systems can benefit from methods and concepts from physics [1-6], not because humans are similar to electrons, but because certain large-scale behaviors can be understood without an understanding of the small-scale details [7], in much the same way that sound waves can be understood without an understanding of atoms. Democratic elections are one such behavior. Over the past few decades, physicists have explored scaling patterns in voting and the dynamics of political opinion formation, e.g. [8-13]. Here, we define the concepts of negative representation, in which a shift in electorate opinions produces a shift in the election outcome in the opposite direction, and electoral instability, in which an arbitrarily small change in electorate opinions can dramatically swing the election outcome, and prove that unstable elections necessarily contain negatively represented opinions. Furthermore, in the presence of low voter turnout, increasing polarization of the electorate can drive elections through a transition from a stable to an unstable regime, analogous to the phase transition by which some materials become ferromagnetic below their critical temperatures. Empirical data suggest that United States presidential elections underwent such a phase transition in the 1970s and have since become increasingly unstable.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2020; v1 submitted 26 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.