-
Multidisciplinary Science in the Multimessenger Era
Authors:
Eric Burns,
Christopher L. Fryer,
Ivan Agullo,
Jennifer Andrews,
Elias Aydi,
Matthew G. Baring,
Eddie Baron,
Peter G. Boorman,
Mohammad Ali Boroumand,
Eric Borowski,
Floor S. Broekgaarden,
Poonam Chandra,
Emmanouil Chatzopoulos,
Hsin-Yu Chen,
Kelly A. Chipps,
Francesca Civano,
Luca Comisso,
Alejandro Cárdenas-Avendaño,
Phong Dang,
Catherine M. Deibel,
Tarraneh Eftekhari,
Courey Elliott,
Ryan J. Foley,
Christopher J. Fontes,
Amy Gall
, et al. (60 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Astrophysical observations of the cosmos allow us to probe extreme physics and answer foundational questions on our universe. Modern astronomy is increasingly operating under a holistic approach, probing the same question with multiple diagnostics including how sources vary over time, how they appear across the electromagnetic spectrum, and through their other signatures, including gravitational w…
▽ More
Astrophysical observations of the cosmos allow us to probe extreme physics and answer foundational questions on our universe. Modern astronomy is increasingly operating under a holistic approach, probing the same question with multiple diagnostics including how sources vary over time, how they appear across the electromagnetic spectrum, and through their other signatures, including gravitational waves, neutrinos, cosmic rays, and dust on Earth. Astrophysical observations are now reaching the point where approximate physics models are insufficient. Key sources of interest are explosive transients, whose understanding requires multidisciplinary studies at the intersection of astrophysics, gravity, nuclear science, plasma physics, fluid dynamics and turbulence, computation, particle physics, atomic, molecular, and optical science, condensed matter and materials science, radiation transport, and high energy density physics. This white paper provides an overview of the major scientific advances that lay at the intersection of physics and astronomy and are best probed through time-domain and multimessenger astrophysics, an exploration of how multidisciplinary science can be fostered, and introductory descriptions of the relevant scientific disciplines and key astrophysical sources of interest.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2025; v1 submitted 5 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Quantum correlation measurements in interferometric gravitational wave detectors
Authors:
D. V. Martynov,
V. V. Frolov,
S. Kandhasamy,
K. Izumi,
H. Miao,
N. Mavalvala,
E. D. Hall,
R. Lanza,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
C. Adams,
R. X. Adhikari,
S. B. Anderson,
A. Ananyeva,
S. Appert,
K. Arai,
S. M. Aston,
S. W. Ballmer,
D. Barker,
B. Barr,
L. Barsotti,
J. Bartlett,
I. Bartos,
J. C. Batch
, et al. (177 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quantum fluctuations in the phase and amplitude quadratures of light set limitations on the sensitivity of modern optical instruments. The sensitivity of the interferometric gravitational wave detectors, such as the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO), is limited by quantum shot noise, quantum radiation pressure noise, and a set of classical noises. We show how the…
▽ More
Quantum fluctuations in the phase and amplitude quadratures of light set limitations on the sensitivity of modern optical instruments. The sensitivity of the interferometric gravitational wave detectors, such as the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO), is limited by quantum shot noise, quantum radiation pressure noise, and a set of classical noises. We show how the quantum properties of light can be used to distinguish these noises using correlation techniques. Particularly, in the first part of the paper we show estimations of the coating thermal noise and gas phase noise, hidden below the quantum shot noise in the Advanced LIGO sensitivity curve. We also make projections on the observatory sensitivity during the next science runs. In the second part of the paper we discuss the correlation technique that reveals the quantum radiation pressure noise from the background of classical noises and shot noise. We apply this technique to the Advanced LIGO data, collected during the first science run, and experimentally estimate the quantum correlations and quantum radiation pressure noise in the interferometer for the first time.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
The Sensitivity of the Advanced LIGO Detectors at the Beginning of Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Authors:
D. V. Martynov,
E. D. Hall,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
C. Adams,
R. X. Adhikari,
R. A. Anderson,
S. B. Anderson,
K. Arai,
M. A. Arain,
S. M. Aston,
L. Austin,
S. W. Ballmer,
M. Barbet,
D. Barker,
B. Barr,
L. Barsotti,
J. Bartlett,
M. A. Barton,
I. Bartos,
J. C. Batch,
A. S. Bell,
I. Belopolski,
J. Bergman
, et al. (239 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) consists of two widely separated 4 km laser interferometers designed to detect gravitational waves from distant astrophysical sources in the frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 kHz. The first observation run of the Advanced LIGO detectors started in September 2015 and ended in January 2016. A strain sensitivity of better than…
▽ More
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) consists of two widely separated 4 km laser interferometers designed to detect gravitational waves from distant astrophysical sources in the frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 kHz. The first observation run of the Advanced LIGO detectors started in September 2015 and ended in January 2016. A strain sensitivity of better than $10^{-23}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ was achieved around 100 Hz. Understanding both the fundamental and the technical noise sources was critical for increasing the observable volume in the universe. The average distance at which coalescing binary black hole systems with individual masses of 30 $M_\odot$ could be detected was 1.3 Gpc. Similarly, the range for binary neutron star inspirals was about 75 Mpc. With respect to the initial detectors, the observable volume of Universe increased respectively by a factor 69 and 43. These improvements allowed Advanced LIGO to detect the gravitational wave signal from the binary black hole coalescence, known as GW150914.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2018; v1 submitted 1 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Calibration of the Advanced LIGO detectors for the discovery of the binary black-hole merger GW150914
Authors:
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
P. A. Altin,
D. V. Amariutei,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai,
M. C. Araya,
C. C. Arceneaux,
J. S. Areeda,
K. G. Arun
, et al. (702 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In Advanced LIGO, detection and astrophysical source parameter estimation of the binary black hole merger GW150914 requires a calibrated estimate of the gravitational-wave strain sensed by the detectors. Producing an estimate from each detector's differential arm length control loop readout signals requires applying time domain filters, which are designed from a frequency domain model of the detec…
▽ More
In Advanced LIGO, detection and astrophysical source parameter estimation of the binary black hole merger GW150914 requires a calibrated estimate of the gravitational-wave strain sensed by the detectors. Producing an estimate from each detector's differential arm length control loop readout signals requires applying time domain filters, which are designed from a frequency domain model of the detector's gravitational-wave response. The gravitational-wave response model is determined by the detector's opto-mechanical response and the properties of its feedback control system. The measurements used to validate the model and characterize its uncertainty are derived primarily from a dedicated photon radiation pressure actuator, with cross-checks provided by optical and radio frequency references. We describe how the gravitational-wave readout signal is calibrated into equivalent gravitational-wave-induced strain and how the statistical uncertainties and systematic errors are assessed. Detector data collected over 38 calendar days, from September 12 to October 20, 2015, contain the event GW150914 and approximately 16 of coincident data used to estimate the event false alarm probability. The calibration uncertainty is less than 10% in magnitude and 10 degrees in phase across the relevant frequency band 20 Hz to 1 kHz.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2017; v1 submitted 11 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
