-
Rocketquake Seismology with a Falcon 9 Rocket Source
Authors:
Gerard. T. Schuster,
Jing Li,
Sherif Hanafy,
Vaughn Thompson,
Jamie Mark Farrell,
Daniel Trentman
Abstract:
We investigate the feasibility of using rocket launches, specifically rocketquakes, as a seismic source to image subsurface velocity and geology of planetary bodies. Toward this goal, we record the seismic vibrations excited by a Falcon 9 rocket launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base (SFB) near Lompoc, California. Nine passive three-component (3C) seismometers were deployed every 18.75 meters alo…
▽ More
We investigate the feasibility of using rocket launches, specifically rocketquakes, as a seismic source to image subsurface velocity and geology of planetary bodies. Toward this goal, we record the seismic vibrations excited by a Falcon 9 rocket launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base (SFB) near Lompoc, California. Nine passive three-component (3C) seismometers were deployed every 18.75 meters along a 45-degree line from the launch site starting at the offset of about 7 km kilometers from the launch pad. Results show that coherent body waves can be recorded with a P-velocity of more than 2.0 km/s and a penetration depth of 1 km or deeper. Stronger Rayleigh waves were also recorded and inverted to give an S-velocity profile to a depth of 60 m. Notably, a 3C recorder placed approximately 15 km from the launch site did not capture any discernible body wave arrivals. The imaging techniques employed for rocketquake seismology integrate inversion methods from earthquake and exploration seismology, yielding the P- and S-velocity profiles of the subsurface. These results suggest that rocket launches as seismic sources will provide unprecedented opportunities for identifying the subsurface hazards, faults, tunnels, water ice, and mineral deposits of planetary bodies and their moons.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2025; v1 submitted 3 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Identifying the Unique Geochemical Fingerprints of Omo Group Beds around Lake Turkana, Kenya by Modified Gaussian Discrimination Analysis
Authors:
Gerard T. Schuster,
Shihang Feng
Abstract:
A modified Gaussian Discriminant Analysis (GDA) is used with an optimal search strategy to identify the unique geochemical fingerprints of six different geological beds in the Lake Turkana area. Three-hundred samples were collected from six different beds in the Omo Group of Lake Turkana, where each sample consisted of the PPMs of 11 different chemical compound. The GDA analysis discovered a uniqu…
▽ More
A modified Gaussian Discriminant Analysis (GDA) is used with an optimal search strategy to identify the unique geochemical fingerprints of six different geological beds in the Lake Turkana area. Three-hundred samples were collected from six different beds in the Omo Group of Lake Turkana, where each sample consisted of the PPMs of 11 different chemical compound. The GDA analysis discovered a unique combination of three tuff compounds that can uniquely identify one of the five beds, where a 6th bed is excluded because only 7 samples were collected from it. These geochemical fingerprints are important because any Turkana hominin fossil in the Omo Group can now be efficiently identified by matching the geochemical fingerprint of a fossil's host rock to the fingerprint of the bed in which it is found. In general, the GDA search strategy can be a powerful tool for efficiently identifying unique class fingerprints of high-dimensional data.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Overview of Physics-Informed Machine Learning Inversion of Geophysical Data
Authors:
Gerard T. Schuster,
Shihang Feng
Abstract:
We review four types of algorithms for physics-informed machine learning (PIML) inversion of geophysical data. The unifying equation is given by the joint objective function $ε$:
\begin{eqnarray} ε^{||-PIML}&=&λ_1 \overbrace{||{\bf W}^{ML}({\bf H}_{\bf w} {\bf d}^{obs}-{\bf m})||^2}^{NN} + λ_2 \overbrace{{||{\bf W}^{FWI}({\bf L} {\bf m}-{\bf d}^{obs})||^2}}^{FWI} ~+ \nonumber\\ \nonumber\\ && +…
▽ More
We review four types of algorithms for physics-informed machine learning (PIML) inversion of geophysical data. The unifying equation is given by the joint objective function $ε$:
\begin{eqnarray} ε^{||-PIML}&=&λ_1 \overbrace{||{\bf W}^{ML}({\bf H}_{\bf w} {\bf d}^{obs}-{\bf m})||^2}^{NN} + λ_2 \overbrace{{||{\bf W}^{FWI}({\bf L} {\bf m}-{\bf d}^{obs})||^2}}^{FWI} ~+ \nonumber\\ \nonumber\\ && + ~~Regularizer, \label{PIML.eq120} \end{eqnarray}where the optimal model ${\bf m}^*$ and weights $\bf w^*$ minimize $ε$. Here, The matrix weights are given by the boldface symbol $\bf W$, and full waveform inversion (FWI) is typically computed using a finite-difference solution of the wave equation, where $\bf L$ represents the forward modeling operation of the wave equation as a function of the model $\bf m$. Also, a fully-connected neural network (NN) is used to compute the model ${\bf H_w}{\bf d}^{obs} \approx \bf m$ from the observed input data ${\bf d}^{obs}$. The selection of weights $λ_i$ and the NN operations determine one of four different PIML algorithms.
PIML offers potential advantages over standard FWI through its enhanced ability to avoid local minima and the option to locally train the inversion operator, minimizing the requirement for extensive training data for global applicability. However, the effectiveness of PIML relies on the similarity between the test and trained data. Nevertheless, a possible strategy to overcome this limitation involves initial pretraining of a PIML architecture with data from a broader region, followed by fine-tuning for specific data-a method reminiscent of the way large language models are pretrained and adapted for various tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Seismic Inversion by Newtonian Machine Learning
Authors:
Yuqing Chen,
Gerard T. Schuster
Abstract:
We present a wave-equation inversion method that inverts skeletonized data for the subsurface velocity model. The skeletonized representation of the seismic traces consists of the low-rank latent-space variables predicted by a well-trained autoencoder neural network. The input to the autoencoder is the recorded common shot gathers, and the implicit function theorem is used to determine the perturb…
▽ More
We present a wave-equation inversion method that inverts skeletonized data for the subsurface velocity model. The skeletonized representation of the seismic traces consists of the low-rank latent-space variables predicted by a well-trained autoencoder neural network. The input to the autoencoder is the recorded common shot gathers, and the implicit function theorem is used to determine the perturbation of the skeletonized data with respect to the velocity perturbation. The final velocity model is the one that best predicts the observed latent-space parameters. Empirical results suggest that the cycle-skipping problem is largely mitigated compared to the conventional full waveform inversion (FWI) method by replacing the waveform differences by those of the latent-space parameters. The advantage of this method over other skeletonized data methods is that no manual picking of important features is required because the skeletal data are automatically selected by the autoencoder. The most significant contribution of this paper is that it provides a general framework for using solutions to the governing PDE to invert skeletal data generated by any type of a neural network. The governing equation can be that for gravity, seismic waves, electromagnetic fields, and magnetic fields. The input data can be the records from different types of data and their skeletal features, as long as the model parameters are sensitive to their perturbations. The skeletal data can be the latent space variables of an autoencoder, a variational autoencoder, or a feature map from a convolutional neural network (CNN), or principal component analysis (PCA) features. In other words, we have combined the best features of Newtonian physics and the pattern matching capabilities of machine learning to invert seismic data by Newtonian machine learning.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
