What determines the distribution of shallow convective mass flux through cloud base?
Authors:
Mirjana Sakradzija,
Cathy Hohenegger
Abstract:
The distribution of cloud-base mass flux is studied using large-eddy simulations (LES) of two reference cases, one representing conditions over the tropical ocean, and another one representing mid-latitude conditions over land. To examine what sets the difference between the two distributions, nine additional LES cases are set up as variations of the two reference cases. We find that the total sur…
▽ More
The distribution of cloud-base mass flux is studied using large-eddy simulations (LES) of two reference cases, one representing conditions over the tropical ocean, and another one representing mid-latitude conditions over land. To examine what sets the difference between the two distributions, nine additional LES cases are set up as variations of the two reference cases. We find that the total surface heat flux and its changes over the diurnal cycle do not influence the distribution shape. The latter is also not determined by the level of organization in the cloud field. It is instead determined by the ratio of the surface sensible heat flux to the latent heat flux, the Bowen ratio $B$. $B$ sets the thermodynamic efficiency of the moist convective heat cycle, which determines the portion of the total surface heat flux that can be transformed into mechanical work of convection against mechanical dissipation. The thermodynamic moist heat cycle sets the average mass flux per cloud $\langle m \rangle$, and through $\langle m \rangle$ it also controls the shape of the distribution. An expression for $\langle m \rangle$ is derived based on the moist convective heat cycle and is evaluated against LES. This expression can be used in shallow cumulus parameterizations as a physical constraint on the mass flux distribution. The similarity between the mass flux and the cloud area distributions indicate that $B$ also has a role in shaping the cloud area distribution, which could explain its different shapes and slopes observed in previous studies.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
Stochastic Parameterization: Towards a new view of Weather and Climate Models
Authors:
Judith Berner,
Ulrich Achatz,
Lauriane Batte,
Lisa Bengtsson,
Alvaro De La Camara,
Daan Crommelin,
Hannah Christensen,
Matteo Colangeli,
Stamen Dolaptchiev,
Christian L. E. Franzke,
Petra Friederichs,
Peter Imkeller,
Heikki Jarvinen,
Stephan Juricke,
Vassili Kitsios,
Franois Lott,
Valerio Lucarini,
Salil Mahajan,
Timothy N. Palmer,
Cecile Penland,
Jin-Song Von Storch,
Mirjana Sakradzija,
Michael Weniger,
Antje Weisheimer,
Paul D. Williams
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The last decade has seen the success of stochastic parameterizations in short-term, medium-range and seasonal forecasts: operational weather centers now routinely use stochastic parameterization schemes to better represent model inadequacy and improve the quantification of forecast uncertainty. Developed initially for numerical weather prediction, the inclusion of stochastic parameterizations not…
▽ More
The last decade has seen the success of stochastic parameterizations in short-term, medium-range and seasonal forecasts: operational weather centers now routinely use stochastic parameterization schemes to better represent model inadequacy and improve the quantification of forecast uncertainty. Developed initially for numerical weather prediction, the inclusion of stochastic parameterizations not only provides better estimates of uncertainty, but it is also extremely promising for reducing longstanding climate biases and relevant for determining the climate response to external forcing. This article highlights recent developments from different research groups which show that the stochastic representation of unresolved processes in the atmosphere, oceans, land surface and cryosphere of comprehensive weather and climate models (a) gives rise to more reliable probabilistic forecasts of weather and climate and (b) reduces systematic model bias. We make a case that the use of mathematically stringent methods for the derivation of stochastic dynamic equations will lead to substantial improvements in our ability to accurately simulate weather and climate at all scales. Recent work in mathematics, statistical mechanics and turbulence is reviewed, its relevance for the climate problem demonstrated, and future research directions outlined.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2017; v1 submitted 29 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
