-
Harder, better, faster, stronger: understanding and improving the tractability of large energy system models
Authors:
Manuel Bröchin,
Bryn Pickering,
Tim Tröndle,
Stefan Pfenninger
Abstract:
Energy system models based on linear programming have been growing in size with the increasing need to model renewables with high spatial and temporal detail. Larger models lead to high computational requirements. Furthermore, seemingly small changes in a model can lead to drastic differences in runtime. Here, we investigate measures to address this issue. We review the mathematical structure of a…
▽ More
Energy system models based on linear programming have been growing in size with the increasing need to model renewables with high spatial and temporal detail. Larger models lead to high computational requirements. Furthermore, seemingly small changes in a model can lead to drastic differences in runtime. Here, we investigate measures to address this issue. We review the mathematical structure of a typical energy system model, and discuss issues of sparsity, degeneracy and large numerical range. We introduce and test a method to automatically scale models to improve numerical range. We test this method as well as tweaks to model formulation and solver preferences, finding that adjustments can have a substantial impact on runtime. In particular, the barrier method without crossover can be very fast, but affects the structure of the resulting optimal solution. We conclude with a range of recommendations for energy system modellers.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
What is redundant and what is not? Computational trade-offs in modelling to generate alternatives for energy infrastructure deployment
Authors:
Francesco Lombardi,
Bryn Pickering,
Stefan Pfenninger
Abstract:
Given the urgent need to devise credible, deep strategies for carbon neutrality, approaches for `modelling to generate alternatives' (MGA) are gaining popularity in the energy sector. Yet, MGA faces limitations when applied to state-of-the-art energy system models: the number of alternatives that can be generated is virtually infinite; no realistic computational effort can discover the complete te…
▽ More
Given the urgent need to devise credible, deep strategies for carbon neutrality, approaches for `modelling to generate alternatives' (MGA) are gaining popularity in the energy sector. Yet, MGA faces limitations when applied to state-of-the-art energy system models: the number of alternatives that can be generated is virtually infinite; no realistic computational effort can discover the complete technology and spatial diversity. Here, based on our own SPORES method, a highly customisable and spatially-explicit advancement of MGA, we empirically test different search strategies - including some adapted from other MGA approaches - with the aim of identifying how to minimise redundant computation. With application to a model of the European power system, we show that, for a fixed number of generated alternatives, there is a clear trade-off in making use of the available computational power to unveil technology versus spatial diversity of system configurations. Moreover, we show that focussing on technology diversity may fail to identify system configurations that appeal to real-world stakeholders, such as those in which capacity is more spread out at the local scale. Based on this evidence that no feasible alternative can be deemed redundant a priori, we propose to initially search for options in a way that balances spatial and technology diversity; this can be achieved by combining the strengths of two different strategies. The resulting solution space can then be refined based on the feedback of stakeholders. More generally, we propose the adoption of ad-hoc MGA sensitivity analyses, targeted at testing a study's central claims, as a computationally inexpensive standard to improve the quality of energy modelling analyses.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2023; v1 submitted 17 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Overcoming the disconnect between energy system and climate modeling
Authors:
Michael T. Craig,
Jan Wohland,
Laurens P. Stoop,
Alexander Kies,
Bryn Pickering,
Hannah C. Bloomfield,
Jethro Browell,
Matteo De Felice,
Chris J. Dent,
Adrien Deroubaix,
Felix Frischmuth,
Paula L. M. Gonzalez,
Aleksander Grochowicz,
Katharina Gruber,
Philipp Härtel,
Martin Kittel,
Leander Kotzur,
Inga Labuhn,
Julie K. Lundquist,
Noah Pflugradt,
Karin van der Wiel,
Marianne Zeyringer,
David J. Brayshaw
Abstract:
Energy system models underpin decisions by energy system planners and operators. Energy system modelling faces a transformation: accounting for changing meteorological conditions imposed by climate change. To enable that transformation, a community of practice in energy-climate modelling has started to form that aims to better integrate energy system models with weather and climate models. Here, w…
▽ More
Energy system models underpin decisions by energy system planners and operators. Energy system modelling faces a transformation: accounting for changing meteorological conditions imposed by climate change. To enable that transformation, a community of practice in energy-climate modelling has started to form that aims to better integrate energy system models with weather and climate models. Here, we evaluate the disconnects between the energy system and climate modelling communities, then lay out a research agenda to bridge those disconnects. In the near-term, we propose interdisciplinary activities for expediting uptake of future climate data in energy system modelling. In the long-term, we propose a transdisciplinary approach to enable development of (1) energy-system-tailored climate datasets for historical and future meteorological conditions and (2) energy system models that can effectively leverage those datasets. This agenda increases the odds of meeting ambitious climate mitigation goals by systematically capturing and mitigating climate risk in energy sector decision making.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2023; v1 submitted 31 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
