Beyond Ternary OPV: High-Throughput Experimentation and Self-Driving Laboratories Optimize Multi-Component Systems
Authors:
Stefan Langner,
Florian Häse,
José Darío Perea,
Tobias Stubhan,
Jens Hauch,
Loïc M. Roch,
Thomas Heumueller,
Alán Aspuru-Guzik,
Christoph J. Brabec
Abstract:
Fundamental advances to increase the efficiency as well as stability of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) are achieved by designing ternary blends which represents a clear trend towards multi-component active layer blends. We report the development of high-throughput and autonomous experimentation methods for the effective optimization of multi-component polymer blends for OPVs. A method for automated…
▽ More
Fundamental advances to increase the efficiency as well as stability of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) are achieved by designing ternary blends which represents a clear trend towards multi-component active layer blends. We report the development of high-throughput and autonomous experimentation methods for the effective optimization of multi-component polymer blends for OPVs. A method for automated film formation enabling the fabrication of up to 6048 films per day is introduced. Equipping this automated experimentation platform with a Bayesian optimization, a self-driving laboratory is constructed that autonomously evaluates measurements to design and execute the next experiments. To demonstrate the potential of these methods, a four-dimensional parameter space of quaternary OPV blends is mapped and optimized for photo-stability. While with conventional approaches roughly 100 mg of material would be necessary, the robot based platform can screen 2,000 combinations with less than 10 mg and machine learning enabled autonomous experimentation identifies the stable compositions with less than 1 mg.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2019; v1 submitted 8 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
Embedding Physics Domain Knowledge into a Bayesian Network Enables Layer-by-Layer Process Innovation for Photovoltaics
Authors:
Zekun Ren,
Felipe Oviedo,
Muang Thway,
Siyu I. P. Tian,
Yue Wang,
Hansong Xue,
Jose Dario Perea,
Mariya Layurova,
Thomas Heumueller,
Erik Birgersson,
Armin Aberle,
Christoph J. Brabec,
Rolf Stangl,
Shijing Sun,
Qianxiao Li,
Fen Lin,
Ian Marius Peters,
Tonio Buonassisi
Abstract:
Process optimization of photovoltaic devices is a time-intensive, trial and error endeavor, without full transparency of the underlying physics, and with user-imposed constraints that may or may not lead to a global optimum. Herein, we demonstrate that embedding physics domain knowledge into a Bayesian network enables an optimization approach that identifies the root cause(s) of underperformance w…
▽ More
Process optimization of photovoltaic devices is a time-intensive, trial and error endeavor, without full transparency of the underlying physics, and with user-imposed constraints that may or may not lead to a global optimum. Herein, we demonstrate that embedding physics domain knowledge into a Bayesian network enables an optimization approach that identifies the root cause(s) of underperformance with layer by-layer resolution and reveals alternative optimal process windows beyond global black-box optimization. Our Bayesian-network approach links process conditions to materials descriptors (bulk and interface properties, e.g., bulk lifetime, doping, and surface recombination) and device performance parameters (e.g., cell efficiency), using a Bayesian inference framework with an autoencoder-based surrogate device-physics model that is 100x faster than numerical solvers. With the trained surrogate model, our approach is robust and reduces significantly the time consuming experimentalist intervention, even with small numbers of fabricated samples. To demonstrate our method, we perform layer-by-layer optimization of GaAs solar cells. In a single cycle of learning, we find an improved growth temperature for the GaAs solar cells without any secondary measurements, and demonstrate a 6.5% relative AM1.5G efficiency improvement above baseline and traditional black-box optimization methods.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2019; v1 submitted 25 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
