Cullen's Stability Principle and Weak Solutions of the Free-surface Semi-geostrophic Equations
Authors:
Mike J. P. Cullen,
Tobias Kuna,
Beatrice Pelloni,
Mark Wilkinson
Abstract:
The semi-geostrophic equations are used widely in the modelling of large-scale atmospheric flows. In this note, we prove the global existence of weak solutions of the incompressible semi-geostrophic equations, in geostrophic coordinates, in a three-dimensional domain with a free upper boundary. The proof, based on an energy minimisation argument originally inspired by Cullen's Stability Principle,…
▽ More
The semi-geostrophic equations are used widely in the modelling of large-scale atmospheric flows. In this note, we prove the global existence of weak solutions of the incompressible semi-geostrophic equations, in geostrophic coordinates, in a three-dimensional domain with a free upper boundary. The proof, based on an energy minimisation argument originally inspired by Cullen's Stability Principle, uses optimal transport results as well as the analysis of Hamiltonian ODEs in spaces of probability measures as studied by Ambrosio and Gangbo. We also give a general formulation of Cullen's Stability Principle in a rigorous mathematical framework.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
Innovative Science
Authors:
Donald W Braben,
John F Allen,
William Amos,
Richard Ball,
Hagan Bayley,
Tim Birkhead,
Peter Cameron,
Eleanor Campbell,
Richard Cogdell,
David Colquhoun,
Steve Davies,
Rod Dowler,
Peter Edwards,
Irene Engle,
Felipe Fernandez-Armesto,
Desmond Fitzgerald,
Jon Frampton,
Dame Anne Glover,
John Hall,
Pat Heslop-Harrison,
Dudley Herschbach,
Sui Huang,
H Jeff Kimble,
Sir Harry Kroto,
James Ladyman
, et al. (23 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Sir, We write as senior scientists about a problem vital to the scientific enterprise and prosperity. Nowadays, funding is a lengthy and complex business. First, universities themselves must approve all proposals for submission. Funding agencies then subject those that survive to peer review, a process by which a few researchers, usually acting anonymously, assess a proposal's chances that it will…
▽ More
Sir, We write as senior scientists about a problem vital to the scientific enterprise and prosperity. Nowadays, funding is a lengthy and complex business. First, universities themselves must approve all proposals for submission. Funding agencies then subject those that survive to peer review, a process by which a few researchers, usually acting anonymously, assess a proposal's chances that it will achieve its goals, is the best value for money, is relevant to a national priority and will impact on a socio-economic problem. Only 25% of proposals received by the funding agencies are funded. These protracted processes force researchers to exploit existing knowledge, severely discourage open-ended studies and are hugely time-consuming. They are also new: before 1970, few researchers wrote proposals. Now they are virtually mandatory.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
