Harmonic Oscillator in Heat Bath: Exact simulation of time-lapse-recorded data, exact analytical benchmark statistics
Authors:
Simon F. Norrelykke,
Henrik Flyvbjerg
Abstract:
The stochastic dynamics of the damped harmonic oscillator in a heat bath is simulated with an algorithm that is exact for time steps of arbitrary size. Exact analytical results are given for correlation functions and power spectra in the form they acquire when computed from experimental time-lapse recordings. Three applications are discussed: (i) Effects of finite sampling-rate and -time, describe…
▽ More
The stochastic dynamics of the damped harmonic oscillator in a heat bath is simulated with an algorithm that is exact for time steps of arbitrary size. Exact analytical results are given for correlation functions and power spectra in the form they acquire when computed from experimental time-lapse recordings. Three applications are discussed: (i) Effects of finite sampling-rate and -time, described exactly here, are similar for other stochastic dynamical systems-e.g. motile micro-organisms and their time-lapse recorded trajectories. (ii) The same statistics is satisfied by any experimental system to the extent it is interpreted as a damped harmonic oscillator at finite temperature-such as an AFM cantilever. (iii) Three other models of fundamental interest are limiting cases of the damped harmonic oscillator at finite temperature; it consequently bridges their differences and describes effects of finite sampling rate and sampling time for these models as well. Finally, we give a brief discussion of nondimensionalization.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2011;
originally announced February 2011.
Power spectrum analysis with least-squares fitting: Amplitude bias and its elimination, with application to optical tweezers and atomic force microscope cantilevers
Authors:
Simon F. Norrelykke,
Henrik Flyvbjerg
Abstract:
Optical tweezers and AFM cantilevers are often calibrated by fitting their experimental powerspectra of Brownian motion. We demonstrate here that if this is done with typical weighted least-squares methods the result is a bias of relative size between -2/n and +1/n on the value of the fitted diffusion coefficient. Here n is the number of power-spectra averaged over, so typical calibrations contain…
▽ More
Optical tweezers and AFM cantilevers are often calibrated by fitting their experimental powerspectra of Brownian motion. We demonstrate here that if this is done with typical weighted least-squares methods the result is a bias of relative size between -2/n and +1/n on the value of the fitted diffusion coefficient. Here n is the number of power-spectra averaged over, so typical calibrations contain 10-20% bias. Both the sign and the size of the bias depends on the weighting scheme applied. Hence, so do length-scale calibrations based on the diffusion coefficient. The fitted value for the characteristic frequency is not affected by this bias. For the AFM then, force measurements are not affected provided an independent length-scale calibration is available. For optical-tweezers there is no such luck, since the spring constant is found as the ratio of the characteristic frequency and the diffusion coefficient. We give analytical results for the weight-dependent bias for the wide class of systems whose dynamics is described by a linear (integro-)differential equation with additive noise, white or colored. Examples are optical tweezers with hydrodynamic self-interaction and aliasing, calibration of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models in finance, models for cell-migration in biology, etc. Because the bias takes the form of a simple multiplicative factor on the fitted amplitude (e.g. the diffusion coefficient) it is straightforward to remove, and the user will need minimal modifications to his or her favorite least-square fitting programs. Results are demonstrated and illustrated using synthetic data, so we can compare fits with known true values. We also fit some commonly occurring power spectra once-and-for-all in the sense that we give their parameter values and associated error-bars as explicit functions of experimental power-spectral values.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2010; v1 submitted 9 June, 2009;
originally announced June 2009.
