Background Radiation Measurements at High Power Research Reactors
Authors:
J. Ashenfelter,
B. Balantekin,
C. X. Baldenegro,
H. R. Band,
G. Barclay,
C. D. Bass,
D. Berish,
N. S. Bowden,
C. D. Bryan,
J. J. Cherwinka,
R. Chu,
T. Classen,
D. Davee,
D. Dean,
G. Deichert,
M. J. Dolinski,
J. Dolph,
D. A. Dwyer,
S. Fan,
J. K. Gaison,
A. Galindo-Uribarri,
K. Gilje,
A. Glenn,
M. Green,
K. Han
, et al. (36 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Research reactors host a wide range of activities that make use of the intense neutron fluxes generated at these facilities. Recent interest in performing measurements with relatively low event rates, e.g. reactor antineutrino detection, at these facilities necessitates a detailed understanding of background radiation fields. Both reactor-correlated and naturally occurring background sources are p…
▽ More
Research reactors host a wide range of activities that make use of the intense neutron fluxes generated at these facilities. Recent interest in performing measurements with relatively low event rates, e.g. reactor antineutrino detection, at these facilities necessitates a detailed understanding of background radiation fields. Both reactor-correlated and naturally occurring background sources are potentially important, even at levels well below those of importance for typical activities. Here we describe a comprehensive series of background assessments at three high-power research reactors, including $γ$-ray, neutron, and muon measurements. For each facility we describe the characteristics and identify the sources of the background fields encountered. The general understanding gained of background production mechanisms and their relationship to facility features will prove valuable for the planning of any sensitive measurement conducted therein.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2015; v1 submitted 11 June, 2015;
originally announced June 2015.
PROSPECT - A Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum Experiment at Short Baselines
Authors:
J. Ashenfelter,
A. B. Balantekin,
H. R. Band,
G. Barclay,
C. Bass,
N. S. Bowden,
C. D. Bryan,
J. J. Cherwinka,
R. Chu,
T. Classen,
D. Davee,
D. Dean,
G. Deichert,
M. Diwan,
M. J. Dolinski,
J. Dolph,
D. A. Dwyer,
Y. Efremenko,
S. Fan,
A. Galindo-Uribarri,
K. Gilje,
A. Glenn,
M. Green,
K. Han,
S. Hans
, et al. (41 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Current models of antineutrino production in nuclear reactors predict detection rates and spectra at odds with the existing body of direct reactor antineutrino measurements. High-resolution antineutrino detectors operated close to compact research reactor cores can produce new precision measurements useful in testing explanations for these observed discrepancies involving underlying nuclear or new…
▽ More
Current models of antineutrino production in nuclear reactors predict detection rates and spectra at odds with the existing body of direct reactor antineutrino measurements. High-resolution antineutrino detectors operated close to compact research reactor cores can produce new precision measurements useful in testing explanations for these observed discrepancies involving underlying nuclear or new physics. Absolute measurement of the 235U-produced antineutrino spectrum can provide additional constraints for evaluating the accuracy of current and future reactor models, while relative measurements of spectral distortion between differing baselines can be used to search for oscillations arising from the existence of eV-scale sterile neutrinos. Such a measurement can be performed in the United States at several highly-enriched uranium fueled research reactors using near-surface segmented liquid scintillator detectors. We describe here the conceptual design and physics potential of the PROSPECT experiment, a U.S.-based, multi-phase experiment with reactor-detector baselines of 7-20 meters capable of addressing these and other physics and detector development goals. Current R&D status and future plans for PROSPECT detector deployment and data-taking at the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory will be discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2015; v1 submitted 29 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
