-
MOND vs. dark matter in light of historical parallels
Authors:
Mordehai Milgrom
Abstract:
MOND is a paradigm that contends to account for the mass discrepancies in the Universe without invoking `dark' components, such as `dark matter' and `dark energy'. It does so by supplanting Newtonian dynamics and General Relativity, departing from them at very low accelerations. Having in mind readers who are historians and philosophers of science, as well as physicists and astronomers, I describe…
▽ More
MOND is a paradigm that contends to account for the mass discrepancies in the Universe without invoking `dark' components, such as `dark matter' and `dark energy'. It does so by supplanting Newtonian dynamics and General Relativity, departing from them at very low accelerations. Having in mind readers who are historians and philosophers of science, as well as physicists and astronomers, I describe in this review the main aspects of MOND -- its statement, its basic tenets, its main predictions, and the tests of these predictions -- contrasting it with the dark-matter paradigm. I then discuss possible wider ramifications of MOND, for example the potential significance of the MOND constant, $a_0$, with possible implications for the roots of MOND in cosmology. Along the way I point to parallels with several historical instances of nascent paradigms. In particular, with the emergence of the Copernican world picture, that of quantum physics, and that of relativity, as regards their initial advent, their development, their schematic structure, and their ramifications. For example, the interplay between theories and their corollary laws, and the centrality of a new constant with converging values as deduced from seemingly unrelated manifestations of these laws. I demonstrate how MOND has already unearthed a number of unsuspected laws of galactic dynamics (to which, indeed, $a_0$ is central) predicting them a priori, and leading to their subsequent verification. I parallel the struggle of the new with the old paradigms, and the appearance of hybrid paradigms at such times of struggle. I also try to identify in the history of those established paradigms a stage that can be likened to that of MOND today.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2020; v1 submitted 10 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Light and Dark in the Universe
Authors:
Mordehai Milgrom
Abstract:
Translation of a popular article on MOND vs. dark matter that appeared, in Hebrew, in the Israeli magazine "Odyssea", dedicated to "thoughts and ideas in the forefront of science and philosophy".
Translation of a popular article on MOND vs. dark matter that appeared, in Hebrew, in the Israeli magazine "Odyssea", dedicated to "thoughts and ideas in the forefront of science and philosophy".
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2012;
originally announced March 2012.
-
MOND: time for a change of mind?
Authors:
Mordehai Milgrom
Abstract:
This is a semi-popular account of the MOND paradigm and its comparison with the competing Newtonian-dynamics-plus-CDM paradigm. It was published recently in the online magazine of the Israel Physical Society in the IYA 2009 issue.
This is a semi-popular account of the MOND paradigm and its comparison with the competing Newtonian-dynamics-plus-CDM paradigm. It was published recently in the online magazine of the Israel Physical Society in the IYA 2009 issue.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2009;
originally announced August 2009.
-
Massive particles in acoustic space-times emergent inertia and passive gravity
Authors:
Mordehai Milgrom
Abstract:
I show that massive-particle dynamics can be simulated by a weak, spherical, external perturbation on a potential flow in an ideal fluid. The effective Lagrangian is of the form mc^2L(U^2/c^2), where U is the velocity of the particle relative to the fluid and c the speed of sound. This can serve as a model for emergent relativistic inertia a la Mach's principle with m playing the role of inertia…
▽ More
I show that massive-particle dynamics can be simulated by a weak, spherical, external perturbation on a potential flow in an ideal fluid. The effective Lagrangian is of the form mc^2L(U^2/c^2), where U is the velocity of the particle relative to the fluid and c the speed of sound. This can serve as a model for emergent relativistic inertia a la Mach's principle with m playing the role of inertial mass, and also of analog gravity where it is also the passive gravitational mass. m depends on the particle type and intrinsic structure, while L is universal: For D dimensional particles L is proportional to the hypergeometric function F(1,1/2;D/2;U^2/c^2). Particles fall in the same way in the analog gravitational field independent of their internal structure, thus satisfying the weak equivalence principle. For D less or equal 5 they all have a relativistic limit with the acquired energy and momentum diverging as U approaches c. For D less or equal 7 the null geodesics of the standard acoustic metric solve our equation of motion. Interestingly, for D=4 the dynamics is very nearly Lorentzian. The particles can be said to follow the geodesics of a generalized acoustic metric of a Finslerian type that shares the null geodesics with the standard acoustic metric. In vortex geometries, the ergosphere is automatically the static limit. As in the real world, in ``black hole'' geometries circular orbits do not exist below a certain radius that occurs outside the horizon. There is a natural definition of antiparticles; and I describe a mock particle vacuum in whose context one can discuss, e.g., particle Hawking radiation near event horizons.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2006; v1 submitted 10 January, 2006;
originally announced January 2006.
