Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: McClure, M W

Commentary on Four New DFIT Papers: (a) In-Situ Measurements from EGS Collab; (b) Comparison of Techniques at the Bedretto Project; (c) Statistical Review of 62 DFITs; and (d) An Article Advocating the Tangent Method

Authors: Mark W. McClure

Abstract: This post provides commentary on recent four papers on diagnostic fracture injection testing (DFIT). The first paper uses in-situ deformation measurements to directly observe fractures opening and closing during fracture injection-falloff tests (Guglielmi et al., 2022). The second compares various stress measurement techniques in a series of fracture/injection tests from the Bedretto project (Brok… ▽ More This post provides commentary on recent four papers on diagnostic fracture injection testing (DFIT). The first paper uses in-situ deformation measurements to directly observe fractures opening and closing during fracture injection-falloff tests (Guglielmi et al., 2022). The second compares various stress measurement techniques in a series of fracture/injection tests from the Bedretto project (Broker and Ma, 2022). The third statistically reviews results from applying the interpretation procedure from McClure et al. (2019) to 62 DFITs across nine different shale plays (McClure et al., 2022). The fourth is an op-ed written in JPT (Journal of Petroleum Technology) by an advocate of the tangent method for estimating DFIT closure stress (Buijs, 2021; 2022). △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Description of ResFrac automated history matching and optimization workflow

Authors: Charles A. Kang, Mark W. McClure, Somasekhar Reddy

Abstract: This document describes the functioning of the automated history matching and optimization workflow implemented with the ResFrac hydraulic fracturing and reservoir simulator. The purpose of the automated history matching and optimization workflow is enable automated calibration of simulator models to observed data and application to forward optimization. The automated workflow works by solving a f… ▽ More This document describes the functioning of the automated history matching and optimization workflow implemented with the ResFrac hydraulic fracturing and reservoir simulator. The purpose of the automated history matching and optimization workflow is enable automated calibration of simulator models to observed data and application to forward optimization. The automated workflow works by solving a formal mathematical optimization problem to minimize misfit with observations from any point in the lifecycle of a hydraulically fractured reservoir, or to maximize a quantity of interest associated such a reservoir, such as net present value. Objective function evaluations in the optimization problem consist of runs of the ResFrac simulator, which is a physics-based model of hydraulic fracturing and reservoir phenomena. The workflow employs a proxy model to improve computational speed and applies experimental design and Bayesian sampling techniques to generate points with which to train the proxy model. This document also provides an overview of the software infrastructure developed to support the automated workflow. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 10 pages, one figure

Discussion of the Paper SPE-187038-MS: Fracture Closure Stress: Reexamining Field and Laboratory Experiments of Fracture Closure Using Modern Interpretation Methodologies

Authors: Mark W. McClure

Abstract: In recent years, there has been discussion in the literature regarding methods of estimating the magnitude of the minimum principal stress from subsurface fracture injection tests, commonly called Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFITs). McClure et al. (2016) used modeling and mathematical analysis to propose that changes should be made to common interpretation techniques. Subsequently, Craig… ▽ More In recent years, there has been discussion in the literature regarding methods of estimating the magnitude of the minimum principal stress from subsurface fracture injection tests, commonly called Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFITs). McClure et al. (2016) used modeling and mathematical analysis to propose that changes should be made to common interpretation techniques. Subsequently, Craig et al. (2017) attempted to refute those findings using field and laboratory observations. This discussion paper reviews the interpretations from Craig et al. (2017) and concludes that their conclusions are unsupported by the data presented. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Bed load proppant transport during slickwater hydraulic fracturing: insights from comparisons between published laboratory data and correlations for sediment and pipeline slurry transport

Authors: Mark W. McClure

Abstract: Bed load transport is the movement of particles along the top of a bed through rolling, saltation, and suspension created by turbulent lift above the bed surface. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in the idea that bed load transport is significant for proppant transport during hydraulic fracturing. However, scaling arguments suggest that bed load transport is only dominant i… ▽ More Bed load transport is the movement of particles along the top of a bed through rolling, saltation, and suspension created by turbulent lift above the bed surface. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in the idea that bed load transport is significant for proppant transport during hydraulic fracturing. However, scaling arguments suggest that bed load transport is only dominant in the laboratory and is negligible at the field scale. I review laboratory experiments that have been used to develop concepts of bed load transport in hydraulic fracturing. I also review the scaling arguments and laboratory results that have been used to argue that viscous drag, not bed load transport, is dominant at the field scale. I compare literature correlations for fluvial sediment transport and for pipeline slurry transport with published laboratory data on proppant transport in slot flow. The comparisons indicate that fluvial transport correlations are suitable for predicting the rate of sediment erosion due to flow of proppant-free fluid over a bed. The pipeline slurry correlations are suitable for predicting the ability of proppant that is already in suspension to flow in bed transport without settling, but only if the aspect ratio of the flowing region in the slot is close to unity. This can occur at the laboratory scale, but not in the field. The comparison indicates that at low rates of proppant flow, the equilibrium bed height in a laboratory proppant transport experiment can be predicted from pipeline slurry correlations. However, as the volumetric flow rate and the aspect ratio of the flowing region in the slot increase, the applicability of the pipeline slurry correlations breaks down. Laboratory experiments using higher volumetric flow rate indicate that bed load transport rates are too low to be significant at the field scale, even if the flow velocity is very high. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.