Thermal performance estimation for cryogenic storage tanks: Application to liquid hydrogen
Authors:
Ailo Aasen,
Sindre Stenen Blakseth,
André Massing,
Petter Nekså,
Magnus Aa. Gjennestad
Abstract:
The design of cryogenic liquid storage solutions requires accurate methods for estimating heat ingress, from the material level to the tank level. For insulation materials, thermal performance is usually measured using ambient conditions and liquid nitrogen at 77 K as boundary temperatures. A key question is how much heat ingress increases when storing liquid hydrogen LH$_2$ at 20 K. We derive the…
▽ More
The design of cryogenic liquid storage solutions requires accurate methods for estimating heat ingress, from the material level to the tank level. For insulation materials, thermal performance is usually measured using ambient conditions and liquid nitrogen at 77 K as boundary temperatures. A key question is how much heat ingress increases when storing liquid hydrogen LH$_2$ at 20 K. We derive theoretical bounds on the increased heat ingress, and show that it remains below 26%. Additionally, we demonstrate that heat ingress is much more sensitive to the warm boundary temperature than the cold boundary temperature. At the tank level, we compare two methods for assessing the steady-state thermal performance of cryogenic tanks: thermal network models and the heat equation solved with the finite element method. The latter offers high accuracy and adaptability for complex geometries, while thermal network models benefit from simplicity, speed and robustness. We apply both approaches to a self-supported LH$_2$ tank concept for maritime transport and analyze sensitivity to structural support thickness, warm boundary temperature, and choice of insulation material. The thermal network model can estimate heat ingress with $\sim$1% error and the cold-spot temperature with error less than 1 K.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
Local Area Cooling versus Broad Area Cooling for Boil-Off Reduction in Large-Scale Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tanks
Authors:
Sindre Stenen Blakseth,
Ailo Aasen,
André Massing,
Petter Nekså
Abstract:
Future use of liquid hydrogen (LH$_2$) as an effective energy carrier will require elimination or minimization of hydrogen boil-off that is not utilized by demands in the value chain. The present work promotes local area cooling (LAC) as a promising boil-off reduction technology. In contrast to the more conventional broad area cooling (BAC), LAC targets local, concentrated heat flows e.g. through…
▽ More
Future use of liquid hydrogen (LH$_2$) as an effective energy carrier will require elimination or minimization of hydrogen boil-off that is not utilized by demands in the value chain. The present work promotes local area cooling (LAC) as a promising boil-off reduction technology. In contrast to the more conventional broad area cooling (BAC), LAC targets local, concentrated heat flows e.g. through tank support structures. This yields important practical benefits, especially for large-scale tanks, due to the order-of-magnitude reduction in the size of the cooling system. Such benefits include lower capital costs and simpler installation, maintenance and coolant management. LAC applied outside the outer tank wall is particularly attractive for tanks with evacuated insulation.
In a series of numerical studies, we use the finite element method to evaluate the thermal performance of LAC and BAC in the context of ship-borne LH$_2$ transport. The studies concern 40 000 m$^3$-capacity, skirt-supported tanks insulated using evacuated perlite or helium-filled polyurethane (HePUR) foam. For the perlite-insulated tank, LAC and BAC with liquid nitrogen coolant can reduce the daily boiloff rate from 0.04%/day to, respectively, 0.011%/day and 0.004%/day. The corresponding numbers for CO$_2$-based refrigeration are 0.031%/day and 0.028%/day. For the HePUR-insulated tank, which has a higher baseline boil-off rate of 0.24%/day, reduced boil-off rates down to 0.17%/day and 0.04%/day are achievable using LAC and BAC, respectively. LAC and BAC both offer increased power efficiency in comparison to reliquefaction only.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
