Lorenz curve of a light beam: evaluating beam quality from a mayorization perspective
Authors:
Miguel A. Porras,
Isabel Gonzalo,
M. Ahmir Malik
Abstract:
We introduce a novel approach for the characterization of the quality of a laser beam that is not based on particular criteria for beam width definition. The Lorenz curve of a light beam is a sophisticated version of the so-called power-in-the-bucket curve, formed by the partial sums of discretized joint intensity distribution in the near and far fields sorted in decreasing order. According to maj…
▽ More
We introduce a novel approach for the characterization of the quality of a laser beam that is not based on particular criteria for beam width definition. The Lorenz curve of a light beam is a sophisticated version of the so-called power-in-the-bucket curve, formed by the partial sums of discretized joint intensity distribution in the near and far fields sorted in decreasing order. According to majorization theory, a higher Lorenz curve implies that all measures of spreading in phase space, and, in particular, all Rényi (and Shannon) entropy-based measures of the beam width products in near and far fields, are unanimously smaller, providing a strong assessment of a better beam quality. Two beams whose Lorenz curves intersect can only be considered of relatively better or lower quality according to specific criteria, which can be inferred from the plot of the respective Lorenz curves.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2017; v1 submitted 16 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
Physics Potential of the ICAL detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO)
Authors:
The ICAL Collaboration,
Shakeel Ahmed,
M. Sajjad Athar,
Rashid Hasan,
Mohammad Salim,
S. K. Singh,
S. S. R. Inbanathan,
Venktesh Singh,
V. S. Subrahmanyam,
Shiba Prasad Behera,
Vinay B. Chandratre,
Nitali Dash,
Vivek M. Datar,
V. K. S. Kashyap,
Ajit K. Mohanty,
Lalit M. Pant,
Animesh Chatterjee,
Sandhya Choubey,
Raj Gandhi,
Anushree Ghosh,
Deepak Tiwari,
Ali Ajmi,
S. Uma Sankar,
Prafulla Behera,
Aleena Chacko
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The upcoming 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeter (ICAL) detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) is designed to study the atmospheric neutrinos and antineutrinos separately over a wide range of energies and path lengths. The primary focus of this experiment is to explore the Earth matter effects by observing the energy and zenith angle dependence of the atmospheric neutrinos in the mul…
▽ More
The upcoming 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeter (ICAL) detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) is designed to study the atmospheric neutrinos and antineutrinos separately over a wide range of energies and path lengths. The primary focus of this experiment is to explore the Earth matter effects by observing the energy and zenith angle dependence of the atmospheric neutrinos in the multi-GeV range. This study will be crucial to address some of the outstanding issues in neutrino oscillation physics, including the fundamental issue of neutrino mass hierarchy. In this document, we present the physics potential of the detector as obtained from realistic detector simulations. We describe the simulation framework, the neutrino interactions in the detector, and the expected response of the detector to particles traversing it. The ICAL detector can determine the energy and direction of the muons to a high precision, and in addition, its sensitivity to multi-GeV hadrons increases its physics reach substantially. Its charge identification capability, and hence its ability to distinguish neutrinos from antineutrinos, makes it an efficient detector for determining the neutrino mass hierarchy. In this report, we outline the analyses carried out for the determination of neutrino mass hierarchy and precision measurements of atmospheric neutrino mixing parameters at ICAL, and give the expected physics reach of the detector with 10 years of runtime. We also explore the potential of ICAL for probing new physics scenarios like CPT violation and the presence of magnetic monopoles.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2017; v1 submitted 27 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
