Benchmarking Geant4 photonuclear process model for the photo-induced reaction of deformed nuclei in the GDR region
Authors:
P. D. Khue,
P. V. Cuong,
D. L. Balabanski,
L. X. Chung,
D. V. Thanh,
D. T. K. Linh,
L. T. Anh
Abstract:
The Geant4 photonuclear process is benchmarked by comparing it with experimental data to verify the ability of the Geant4 toolkit to simulate the photo-induced reaction on deformed nuclei in the Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) region. The simulation results are compared with experimental data of the deformed nuclei (153Eu, 160Gd, 165Ho, and 186W) targets in terms of both the average neutron energies…
▽ More
The Geant4 photonuclear process is benchmarked by comparing it with experimental data to verify the ability of the Geant4 toolkit to simulate the photo-induced reaction on deformed nuclei in the Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) region. The simulation results are compared with experimental data of the deformed nuclei (153Eu, 160Gd, 165Ho, and 186W) targets in terms of both the average neutron energies and the photonuclear cross-sections. The agreement between the calculated results of the Geant4 photonuclear process model and the experimental measurements is analyzed.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Checking the $^8$Be anomaly with a two-arm electron positron pair spectrometer
Authors:
Tran The Anh,
Tran Dinh Trong,
Attila J. Krasznahorkay,
Attila Krasznahorkay,
József Molnár,
Zoltán Pintye,
Nguyen Ai Viet,
Nguyen The Nghia,
Do Thi Khanh Linh,
Bui Thi Hoa,
Le Xuan Chung,
Nguyen Tuan Anh
Abstract:
We have repeated the experiment performed recently by Krasznahorkay et al., (Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 042501 (2016)), which may indicate a new particle called X17 in the literature. In order to get a reliable, and independent result, we used a different type of electron-positron pair spectrometer which have a more simple acceptance/efficiency as a function of the correlation angle, but the other cond…
▽ More
We have repeated the experiment performed recently by Krasznahorkay et al., (Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 042501 (2016)), which may indicate a new particle called X17 in the literature. In order to get a reliable, and independent result, we used a different type of electron-positron pair spectrometer which have a more simple acceptance/efficiency as a function of the correlation angle, but the other conditions of the experiment were very similar to the published ones. We could confirm the presence of the anomaly measured at the E$_x$=18.15 MeV resonance, and also confirm their absence at the E$_x$=17.6 MeV resonance, and at E$_p$= 800 keV off resonance energies.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2024; v1 submitted 21 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.