Measurement of n-resolved State-Selective Charge Exchange in Ne(8,9)+ Collision with He and H2
Authors:
J. W. Xu,
C. X. Xu,
R. T. Zhang,
X. L. Zhu,
W. T. Feng,
L. Gu,
G. Y. Liang,
D. L. Guo,
Y. Gao,
D. M. Zhao,
S. F. Zhang,
M. G. Su,
X. Ma
Abstract:
Charge exchange between highly charged ions and neutral atoms and molecules has been considered as one of the important mechanisms controlling soft X ray emissions in many astrophysical objects and environments. However, for modeling charge exchange soft X ray emission, the data of n and l resolved state selective capture cross sections are often obtained by empirical and semiclassical theory calc…
▽ More
Charge exchange between highly charged ions and neutral atoms and molecules has been considered as one of the important mechanisms controlling soft X ray emissions in many astrophysical objects and environments. However, for modeling charge exchange soft X ray emission, the data of n and l resolved state selective capture cross sections are often obtained by empirical and semiclassical theory calculations. With a newly built cold target recoil ion momentum spectroscopy (COLTRIMS) apparatus, we perform a series of measurements of the charge exchange of Ne(8,9)+ ions with He and H2 for collision energy ranging from 1 to 24.75 keV/u. n resolved state selective capture cross-sections are reported. By comparing the measured state selective capture cross sections to those calculated by the multichannel Landau Zener method (MCLZ), it is found that MCLZ calculations are in good agreement with the measurement for the dominant n capture for He target. Furthermore, by using nl resolved cross sections calculated by MCLZ and applying l distributions commonly used in the astrophysical literature to experimentally derived n resolved cross sections, we calculate the soft X ray emissions in the charge exchange between 4 keV/u Ne8+ and He by considering the radiative cascade from the excited Ne7+ ions. Reasonable agreement is found in comparison to the measurement for even and separable models, and MCLZ calculations give results in a better agreement.
△ Less
Submitted 10 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
Electron density diagnostic potential of Ar XIV soft X-ray emission lines
Authors:
G. Y. Liang,
G. Zhao,
J. L. Zeng,
J. R. Shi
Abstract:
Theoretical electron density-sensitive line ratios $R_1 - R_6$ of Ar XIV soft X-ray emission lines are presented. We found that these line ratios are sensitive to electron density $n_e$, and the ratio $R_1$ is insensitive to electron temperature $T_e$. Recent work has shown that accurate atomic data, such as electron impact excitation rates, is very important for reliable determination of the el…
▽ More
Theoretical electron density-sensitive line ratios $R_1 - R_6$ of Ar XIV soft X-ray emission lines are presented. We found that these line ratios are sensitive to electron density $n_e$, and the ratio $R_1$ is insensitive to electron temperature $T_e$. Recent work has shown that accurate atomic data, such as electron impact excitation rates, is very important for reliable determination of the electron density of laboratory and astrophysical plasmas. Present work indicates that the maximum discrepancy of line ratios introduced from different atomic data calculated with distorted wave and R-matrix approximations, is up to 18% in the range of $n_e=10^{9-13}$cm$^{-3}$. By comparison of these line ratios with experiment results carried out in electron beam ion trap (EBIT-II), electron density of the laboratory plasma is diagnosed, and a consistent result is obtained from $R_1$, $R_2$ and $R_3$. Our result is in agreement with that diagnosed by Chen et al using triplet of N VI. A relative higher diagnosed electron density from $R_2$ is due to its weak sensitivity to electron temperature. A better consistency at lower $T_e$ indicates that temperature of the laboratory plasma is lower than log$T_e$(K)=6.5. Comparison between the measured and theoretical ratios reveals that 32.014~Åline is weakly blended by lines from other Ar ions, while 30.344~Åline is strongly contaminated.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2006;
originally announced June 2006.